User:Duckdad

Contributes to the following areas of interest:

• audio
• triathlon
• rottweilers
• Canberra

Feels that Wikipedia is biased. What are editors getting paid?

Biased - Are you being paid?

So explain to me why EACH pf the following pages still exist?

1. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goldwave - a page I based the WAVEPAD page on.
2. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fast_Edit - a shareware program
3. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BIAS_Peak - which notes "this article is written like and advertisement" but has not been tagged for speedy deletion
4. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FlexiMusic_Wave_Editor - with links to it's home page and not much else
5. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/REAPER - with links to it's home page and not much else
6. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Total_Recorder

Peace, Love & Wikipedia Editors

My goal was to prove that Wikipedia Editors are biased. I blatantly copied the GoldeWave Wikipedia article and replaced information in it about WavePad it's competitor in the commercial marketplace. WavePad was once again singled out for speedy deletion. When I questioned this on Friday the 20th I came back Monday to find that I had been cited for uncivil behaviour (am I in a warped version of China here?) because I asked the question above and listed articles similar to WavePad in the fact that they are written like an advertisement, contain no internal links, no useful information, no sources cited and only links to their pages.

When asking again I was cited for being too aggressive in my attitude (so we're in a commune run by Chinese). Don't tell me that all Wikipedia editors are pot smoking "hey man it's cool" and have never been question on their ethics before.