User:Duff/RfC/U draft

{{Userspace RFC draft}}

In order to remain listed at Wikipedia:Requests for comment/User conduct, at least two people need to show that they tried to resolve a dispute with this user and have failed. This must involve the same dispute with a single user, not different disputes or multiple users. The persons complaining must provide evidence of their efforts, and each of them must certify it by signing this page with ~~~~. If this does not happen within 48 hours of the creation of this dispute page (which was: ~~~~), the page will be deleted. The current date and time is: 08:19, 21 May 2024 (UTC).

---

• Example user (talk · contribs · logs)

---

Users should not edit other people's summaries or views, except to endorse them. All signed comments other than your own view or an endorsement should be directed to this page's discussion page.

Statement of the dispute

This is a summary written by users who are concerned by this user's conduct. Users signing other sections ("Response" or "Outside views") should not edit the "Statement of the dispute" section. The editor uses Wikipedia for the sole or primary purpose of advocating a specific agenda at the expense of core policies and consensus-based editing and has established a pattern of single-purpose advocacy.

Desired outcome

This is a summary written by users who have initiated the request for comment. It should spell out exactly what the changes they'd like to see in the user, or what questions of behavior should be the focus. The editor will voluntarily limit his assistance at Arborsculpture to making suggestions on the talk page. The editor will agree to provide high-quality sources whenever s/he adds potentially controversial information to articles related to Tree shaping. The editor will agree to make an effort to comment on the content, not the contributor. The editor will agree to apply their enthusiasm with a greater regard for quality and accuracy (both in the choice of sources and the way in which they are used), which would be of great benefit to Wikipedia's users (and editors).

Description

{Add summary here, but you must use the section below to certify or endorse it. Users who edit or endorse this summary should not edit the other summaries, other than to endorse them.}

Evidence of disputed behavior

(Provide diffs. Links to entire articles aren't helpful unless the editor created the entire article. Edit histories also aren't helpful as they change as new edits are performed.)

Applicable policies and guidelines

{list the policies and guidelines that apply to the disputed conduct}

1. WP:CONFLICT
2. WP:SPA
3. WP:OWN
4. WP:CONS
5. WP:CIVIL
6. WP:NPA
7. WP:HARASS
8. WP:LINKLOVE
9. WP:NPOV
10. WP:NOR
11. WP:VERIFY
12. WP:RELIABLE
13. WP:DISRUPT
14. WP:GAME
15. WP:ROLE
16. WP:MEAT
17. WP:CANVAS
18. WP:EDIT
19. WP:NOT#FORUM
20. WP:BATTLE
21. WP:SOAP

Applicable essays

1. WP:PUSH
2. WP:TEDIOUS
3. WP:CANDOR

Evidence of trying to resolve the dispute

(Provide diffs. Links to entire articles aren't helpful unless the editor created the entire article. Edit histories also aren't helpful as they change as new edits are performed.)

Evidence of failing to resolve the dispute

(Provide diffs to demonstrate that the disputed behavior continued after trying to resolve the dispute.)

Users certifying the basis for this dispute

{Users who tried and failed to resolve the dispute}

Response

This is a summary written by the user whose conduct is disputed, or by other users who think that the dispute is unjustified and that the above summary is biased or incomplete. Users signing other sections ("Statement of the dispute" and "Outside Views") should not edit the "Response" section.

{Add summary here, but you must use the endorsement section below to sign. Users who edit or endorse this summary should not edit the other summaries.}

Users who endorse this summary:

Outside view

This is a summary written by users not directly involved with the dispute but who would like to add an outside view of the dispute. Users editing other sections ("Statement of the dispute" and "Response") should not edit the "Outside Views" section, except to endorse an outside view.

Outside view by

{Add summary here, but you must use the endorsement section below to sign. Users who edit or endorse this summary should not edit the other summaries.}

Users who endorse this summary:

Outside view by

{Add summary here, but you must use the endorsement section below to sign. Users who edit or endorse this summary should not edit the other summaries.}

Users who endorse this summary:

Reminder to use the talk page for discussion

All signed comments and talk not related to an endorsement should be directed to this page's discussion page. Discussion should not be added below. Discussion should be posted on the talk page. Threaded replies to another user's vote, endorsement, evidence, response, or comment should be posted to the talk page.