User:Fascianiwikipemia/Vladimir Lenin's brain/Bibliography

Bibliography

As you gather the sources for your Wikipedia contribution, think about the following:

Is the source from a reliable publication?
- Reliable publications include established newspapers, academic journals and books, textbooks, and other published sources with reputations for accuracy and fact-checking.
- Unreliable sources include blog posts and other self-published works, press releases, and social media posts.
Is the source verifiable?
- In order for a source to be considered verifiable, other editors should be able to consult the source.
Is the source independent of the subject?
- Is the source connected in any way to the subject? This is especially important when writing biographies or about organizations.
- For example, if you were writing a biography, sources like the person's webpage or personal blog would not be considered independent.
Is the source primary or secondary?
- Primary sources include first-hand accounts, autobiographies, and other original content.
- Wikipedia allows limited use of primary sources, but typically only for straightforward, descriptive statements of facts, and only if they are published and verifiable without requiring specialized knowledge.
- Secondary sources should be the main basis for a biography on Wikipedia.
If you're working on a topic related to medicine or psychology, ensure that your sources follow these special guidelines.
If you're creating a new article, consider the following:
- Ensure that your topic meets Wikipedia's notability guidelines.
- In order for a topic to meet the notability requirement, you must be able to identify 2-3 sources that are reliable, verifiable, and independent of the subject you're writing about.
- Finding sufficient sources to establish notability can be especially hard when writing about people or organizations.
- Sources that are not independent of the subject might be useful additions, but don't count towards the notability requirement.
- Wikipedia has developed special guidelines for writing about living persons. Please follow these carefully.
- Wikipedia has a series of guidelines for writing about different categories of people, such as academics and artists. If you're trying to create a new entry about a living person, please look at these carefully.

If you're not sure whether a source is reliable, ask a librarian! If you have questions about Wikipedia's sourcing rules, you can use the Get Help button below to contact your Wikipedia Expert.

Get Help

Bibliography[edit]

ADD: Faria, McConville, McDermott, Rzesnitzek, Richter, Sánchez-Miguel, Satzinger, Yurchak
- Abbott, Alison. “A New Atlas of the Brain.” Nature 424, no. 6946 (July 1, 2003): 249–50. https://doi.org/10.1038/424249a.
- Bentivoglio, Marina. “Cortical Structure and Mental Skills: Oskar Vogt and the Legacy of Lenin’s Brain.” Brain Research Bulletin 47, no. 4 (November 1, 1998): 291–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0361-9230(98)00124-5.
- Gregory, Paul R. “Lenin’s Brain.” In Lenin’s Brain and Other Tales from the Secret Soviet Archives, 24–35. 555. Hoover Institution Press, 2008.
- Kaplan, Gary P., and Boris M. Petrikovsky. “Advanced Cerebrovascular Disease and the Death of Vladimir Ilyich Lenin.” Neurology 42, no. 1 (January 1, 1992): 241–241. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.42.1.241.
- Klatzo, Igor. “Advancing Towards Objectives Through Berlin Minefields Under the Mighty Shield of the Krupps.” In Cécile and Oskar Vogt: The Visionaries of Modern Neuroscience, edited by Igor Klatzo, 15–38. Acta Neurochirurgica Supplements. Vienna: Springer, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-6141-8_3.
- Kreutzberg, Georg W., Igor Klatzo, and Paul Kleihues. “Oskar and Cécile Vogt, Lenin’s Brain and the Bumble-Bees of the Black Forest.” Brain Pathology 2, no. 4 (1992): 363–64. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-3639.1992.tb00712.x.
- Lerner, V., Y. Finkelstein, and E. Witztum. “The Enigma of Lenin’s (1870–1924) Malady.” European Journal of Neurology 11, no. 6 (2004): 371–76. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-1331.2004.00839.x.
- Magoun, Horace W. “Development of Brain Research Institutes.” In Development of Brain Research Institutes, 1–40. Columbia University Press, 1962. https://doi.org/10.7312/fren91252-003.
- Martin, Michael, Axel Karenberg, and Heiner Fangerau. “Neurowissenschaftler am Kaiser-Wilhelm-Institut für Hirnforschung im „Dritten Reich“: Oskar Vogt – Hugo Spatz – Wilhelm Tönnis.” Der Nervenarzt 91, no. 1 (February 1, 2020): 89–99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00115-019-00847-2.
- Smith, Kathleen E. Review of Review of Lenin’s Brain and Other Tales from the Secret Soviet Archives, by Paul R. Gregory. The Slavonic and East European Review 88, no. 4 (2010): 776–78. https://www.jstor.org/stable/41061940.
- Stefani, S. “The brain of Lenin.” Minerva medica 48, no. 61–62 (1957): Varia 1276.
- Tumarkin, Nina. “Lenin’s Brain and Other Tales from the Secret Soviet Archives.” Canadian-American Slavic Studies 45, no. 2 (January 1, 2011): 242–43. https://doi.org/10.1163/221023911X556535.
- V Stuckrad-Barre, S., and A. Danek. “[Oskar Vogt (1870-1959). Hypnotist and brain researcher, husband of Cecile Vogt (1875-1962)].” Der Nervenarzt 75, no. 10 (October 2004): 1038–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00115-004-1772-x.
- Vein, Alla A., and Marion L. C. Maat-Schieman. “Famous Russian Brains: Historical Attempts to Understand Intelligence.” Brain 131, no. 2 (February 1, 2008): 583–90. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awm326.
- Vinters, Harry, Lev Lurie, and Philip A. Mackowiak. “Vessels of Stone: Lenin’s ‘Circulatory Disturbance of the Brain.’” Human Pathology 44, no. 10 (October 1, 2013): 1967–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humpath.2012.11.017.
- Zeidman, Lawrence A. “Neuroscience in Nazi Europe Part II: Resistance against the Third Reich.” Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences 38, no. 6 (November 2011): 826–38. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0317167100012397.

Bibliography[edit]

References[edit]