User talk:Hexagon70

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from User:Hexagon70)
es-3Este usuario puede contribuir con un nivel avanzado de español.
ru-2Этот участник неплохо знает русский язык.
fr-2Cet utilisateur peut contribuer avec un niveau intermédiaire en français.
ar-1
هذا المستخدم يتحدث اللغة العربية بمستوى مبتدئ.
exoThis editor is an exopedian.
                       ^    ^
                      / \  //\
        |\___/|      /   \//  .\
        /O  O  \__  /    //  | \ \
       /     /  \/_/    //   |  \  \
       @___@'    \/_   //    |   \   \ 
          |       \/_ //     |    \    \ 
          |        \///      |     \     \ 
         _|_ /   )  //       |      \     _\
        '/,_ _ _/  ( ; -.    |    _ _\.-~        .-~~-^-.
        ,-{        _      `-.|.-~-.           .~         `.
         '/\      /                 ~-. _ .-~      .-~^-.  \
            `.   {            }                   /      \  \
          .----~-.\        \-'                 .~         \  `. \^-.
         ///.----..>    c   \             _ -~             `.  ^-`   ^-_
           ///-._ _ _ _ _ _ _}^ - - - - ~                     ~--,   .-~
                                                                 /.-'

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:07, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

February 2016[edit]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on 2015 San Bernardino attack. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. TJH2018 (talk) 22:32, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Hexagon70. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Hexagon70. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]