User:Hhkohh/SuggestBot RfB

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a successful request for bureaucratship. Please do not modify it.

The result was a successful April Fools RfB. Many oppose !votes came down to humanism Machineophobia, and as such are (non-person)al attacks. ∰Bellezzasolo✡ Discuss 23:19, 1 April 2018 (UTC)

SuggestBot

Final:(14/4/2) ended 23:00, 1 April 2018 (UTC)

Nomination

SuggestBot (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) – This user suggested me many articles so that I can use him to assist me in my working. So he should have enough knowledge being a crat Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 13:32, 1 April 2018 (UTC)

Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:Thank you for candidate. --SuggestBot

Questions for the candidate

1. Please prove that you are not a machine by typing in the characters shown here:

A: Because I saw that you don't use template to ask a qusetion. SuggestBot

1. 5 parsons were in a tree kissing with an insurance policy for 6 parsonages and 3 cows. How much milk does communism get?

Discussion

• Links for SuggestBot: SuggestBot (talk · contribs · deleted · count · AfD · logs · block log · lu · rfar · spi)
• Edit summary usage for SuggestBot can be found here.

---

Please keep discussion constructive and civil. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review their contributions before commenting.

Support

1. Support: Experienced bot. - Siddiqsazzad001 (TALK) 13:57, 1 April 2018 (UTC)
2. Support: I suggest he keeps his big bot shut. Deb (talk) 13:57, 1 April 2018 (UTC)
3. Support Crats need to be rule abiding, and suggestbot is certainly so Galobtter (pingó mió) 13:58, 1 April 2018 (UTC)
4. Support - this is a superb suggestion, as ever. Testament to their poise and prowess at editing. Impeccable experience. Stormy clouds (talk) 13:59, 1 April 2018 (UTC)
5. Support – We need more boteaucrats. Linguist^unEins^uno 14:00, 1 April 2018 (UTC)
6. Support - Will be able to desysop all rouge admins in the flashest of flashes. ∰Bellezzasolo✡ Discuss 14:11, 1 April 2018 (UTC)
7. Support Bot is good at suggesting... Pkbwcgs (talk) 15:16, 1 April 2018 (UTC)
8. It would actually be a joke if a bot got a higher percentage than an actual human. Aiken D 15:25, 1 April 2018 (UTC)
9. Support Fits with the 'boring as hell' meme. talk to !dave 16:21, 1 April 2018 (UTC)
10. Support: Somewhat nonsensical. That's better than our current bureaucracy, though. (Please don't kill me for this joke.) — Javert2113 (talk) 17:16, 1 April 2018 (UTC)
11. Support we could always use more automated 'crats to do all the work Human crats don't want or can't feasibly do. I for one don't see a huge issue with this --TheSandDoctor ^Talk 17:40, 1 April 2018 (UTC)
12. Support: this editor has probably made more positive suggestions to my talkpage, by charachter count, than any other. A clear NETPOSITIVE. Also, Bureaucrats should be uncontroversial, and this is one of more uncontroversial editors. 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 21:02, 1 April 2018 (UTC)
13. Support as opposer. 1.02 editor (C651 set 217/218) 22:46, 1 April 2018 (UTC)
14. Support As a nominator. Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 22:55, 1 April 2018 (UTC)

Oppose

1. Oppose Bureaucrats need a human touch. --Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 13:47, 1 April 2018 (UTC)
2. Oppose Concur with Emir. I am not willing to bow to my technological overlord just yet. (said, of course, while interfacing with a technological overlord to post this post) --Hammersoft (talk) 16:33, 1 April 2018 (UTC)
3. Oppose. Needs to shut up and mind their own business. --Tryptofish (talk) 18:44, 1 April 2018 (UTC)
4. Oh geez, bot bureaucracy. WHEN WILL IT END? epicgenius (talk) 19:02, 1 April 2018 (UTC)

Neutral

1. Neutral: hasn't answered questions yet. —AnAwesomeArticleEditor ON WHEELS! ^AprilFools₂₀₁₈ (talk · contribs) 14:56, 1 April 2018 (UTC)
2. Neutral. I am afraid to say that should we grant adminship/bureaucratship to a computerized program, such as SuggestBot, it may be repeatedly denied by external sites, with messages similar to this well-known one from Google: "We're sorry, but your computer or network may be sending automated queries. To protect our users, we can't process your request right now." If this happens, SuggestBot will do nothing but keep trying until it succeeds (which it will likely never do), eating up our resources along the way. And once they're all gone... you will probably know what happens next. ««« SOME GADGET GEEK »»» (talk) 14:57, 1 April 2018 (UTC)

General comments