User:Kmmy47

Article Evaluation[edit]

-Aztec Society

Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?
- The information is a little all over the place. There is an outline but the information does not connect very well and is out of order.
Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
- There is some bias in this article, but for the most part is is neutral.
Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
- The culture aspect is underrepresented, the education of the aztecs has a lot of information though.
Check a few citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article?
- There are many citations that are needed and some citations are incomplete. There are not any links to the sources.
Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted?
- Most of the references are from university article websites. I am not sure if these are appropriate sources or not, but majority of the sources all come from one place so the information is not cross referenced.
Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added?
- Several of the edits have been made this year, but there is information that could be added to each section.
Check out the Talk page of the article. What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic?
- The article has been marked as needing immediate attention and of high importance. Many points have been taken out of the article because they were not cited.
How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects?
- This article has been rater B-Class and is supported by WikiProject Aztec as high-importance
How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class?
- We have not talked much about this topic in class yet.