User talk:Lenore

I'm an Italian user. Please, contact me on it.wiki
(and remember to sign yourself)

{{Adminhelp}}Delete User:Lenore/mono.js, as it causes trouble (I think). Thanks Lenore (talk) 01:08, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Done NuclearWarfare _(Talk) 01:22, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

{{Adminhelp}}Delete User:Lenore/autolink.js and User:Lenore/autolink.js/todelete.js and then move User:Lenore/autolink.js/dev.js to User:Lenore/autolink.js. Thanks Lenore (talk) 22:45, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Done Best regards, PeterSymonds (talk) 22:52, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

{{Adminhelp}} Delete User:Lenore/autolink.js/dev.js please. Thanks --Lenore (talk) 08:44, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Next time, add {{db-u1}} to it. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 10:01, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Chelsea Manning[edit]

I have reverted your edit on Chelsea Manning as it does not reflect current consensus and practice- please see Talk:Chelsea Manning. OSborn ^arf_contribs. 22:04, 26 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Lenore, you have come late to a discussion which has been dealt with decisively already. Please look at the archives for records of this. Your talk page contributions aren't improving the quality of the article itself and are going over ground which has been covered many times in recent weeks. Please move on and make some editorial contributions to article space rather than sending this hamster wheel round a few more times. Kim Dent-Brown ^(Talk) 13:01, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Msgnw: listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Msgnw:. Since you had some involvement with the Msgnw: redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). John Vandenberg ^(chat) 02:21, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Discretionary sanctions[edit]

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

This message is informational only and does not imply misconduct regarding your contributions to date.

March 2015[edit]

Hello, I'm RolandR. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Women in the United Arab Emirates without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. RolandR (talk) 12:02, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Women in the United Arab Emirates. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount and can lead to a block, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. RolandR (talk) 23:00, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 4 April[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Legal system of the United Arab Emirates page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:19, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yulia Tymoshenko[edit]

dear user! do not delete important information on the page Tymoshenko. Information about the political persecution of Tymoshenko and legal rehabilitation. This information is available in Ukrainian, Russian Wikipedia.--Jan777 (talk) 10:00, 18 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:58, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

December 2015[edit]

Your recent editing history at Free Syrian Army shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Scr★pIron^IV 22:48, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Lenore. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]