User:Mino-wiijiindi/sandbox

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Some policy implications[edit]

Avoiding wrongful convictions[edit]

safety doctrine[1]

Identifying and processing innocence claims[edit]

Basic range of criminal justice outcomes, along a normative distribution curve

using discipline of social science[2] https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/grants/241389.pdf

U.S. incarceration rates 1925 onwards

The rapid increase in the U.S. incarceration rate since the 1990s, occurring simultaneously with a drop in crime, helped raise the profile of wrongful convictions in the United States.[3] The advent of DNA testing increasingly overturning death row convictions, and then other convictions (with or without DNA testing), further spurred debate on how many are actually innocent.[4] Prosecutors also seek estimates of wrongful conviction rates to get ahead of Innocence Projects, including those leading a Conviction Review Unit[5], and Criminal Cases Review Commission in parts of the UK. Although scholarly concern about wrongful convictions stretches back more than a century.[6][7][8]

And if Innocence Projects legitimately require more resources to process an overwhelming volume of viable innocence claims.[9]

Chart[edit]

tooltip 1
tooltip 2
tooltip 3
250
500
750
1,000
1,250
1,500
Prison
Custody
Ex-prison
All felonies
  •   .00016%
  •   0.5%
  •   15%

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Module:Chart


Compensation statutes[edit]

liability for exoneration compensation "The federal law that compensates the wrongfully convicted is not so stringent and allows the possibility of a person whose self-defense claim was improperly rejected to be exonerated and compensated."<Zalman> States adopting compensation legislation limit coverage to those demonstrating factual innocence, and other constraints excluding some exonerees from compensation eligibility.

External links[edit]

References[edit]

  1. ^ Sangero, B. and Halpert, M. (2011), A safety doctrine for the criminal justice system, 2011 MichStLawRev 1293 (PDF)
  2. ^ Predicting erroneous convictions, Iowa Law Review 99:471. (PDF), retrieved 2019-04-30
  3. ^ Desilver, D. (2014-03-28), Lower support for death penalty tracks with falling crime rates, more exonerations. Pew Research Center., retrieved 2019-04-27 {{citation}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |1= (help)
  4. ^ Innocence Project (2011-12-12), How Many Innocent People are in Prison?, retrieved 2019-04-27
  5. ^ Hollway, J. (2016), Conviction Review Units: A National Perspective. Penn Law: Legal Scholarship Repository. Paper 1614., retrieved 2019-04-27
  6. ^ Gould, J. (2010), One hundred years later: Wrongful convictions after a century of research. Journ Crim Law & Research 100:825-868., retrieved 2019-04-27
  7. ^ Borchard, E. M. (1913), European systems of state indemnity for errors of criminal justice, 3 J.Am.Inst.Crim.L.&Criminology 684.
  8. ^ Smith, B.P. (2005), The history of wrongful execution, 56 Hastings L.J. 1185, 1188-89.
  9. ^ Krieger, S. (2011), Why our justice system convicts innocent people, and the challenges faced by Innocence Projects trying to exonerate them. New Criminal Law Review: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal, 14:3, 333-402., retrieved 2019-04-27 {{citation}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |1= (help)