User:Mladifilozof/archive1

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Zivio![edit]

Postovanje, mladi kolega ;-) Elem, primjetio sam da si dodao na neke clanke linkove na neke druge clanke koji su povezani sa ovim prvim clancima... sad, to bas i nije neki poso, znas, obzirom da su svi ti clanci vec zalinkani iz samog teksta clanka. Uzmimo primjer Zabranjenog pušenja. Ti si na kraj dodao linkove na New Primitives, Nele Karajlić i Sejo Sexon. A svi ti clanci su spomenuti u tekstu i zalinkani. U "See also" paragraf idu clanci koji nisu spomenuti. A, kako su ova tri clanka vec spomenuta prije, njima nije mjesto u "See also" paragrafu... tako da, nemoj se ljutit, al ja cu sad revertati to sto si ti napravio... nista osobno jel, stvar je samo u tome da "See also" ne sluzi tome... --Dijxtra 22:02, 29 August 2006 (UTC)


Squats in UK[edit]

I nominated an article that you created, Squats in UK, for deletion. If you think that the article is salvageable, or that I'm mistaken, please comment on its deletion page. Please see the Guide to deletion if you have any questions about Wikipedia's deletion process. -- Leuko 02:20, 9 October 2006 (UTC)


It can not be Ivo Lola Ribar speaking on the AVNOJ session, he was shot just two days earlier on the airfield of Glamocko polje. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.237.161.151 (talk) 11:36, 11 August 2008 (UTC)

Hello Mladifilozof[edit]

hi Mladifilozof, nice that you feel like contributing to wikipedia and especially nice that you want to help with the squatting articles, which are an area of interest for me also ... if i may give you some advice i would say there is not much point making lists of squats for individual countries becuase they will probably get deleted as non-notable ... as is happening to the UK squats page. Maybe its better to add notable squats to the squatting page and give them stub pages if you feel like adding them? Notability is of course a difficult notion, but there is a common sense element to it. They each must of course be verifiable.

Here are some stubs i made if you wanna look at them:

And a page i made:

Also i made a comment on the deletion page that in my opinion squats and social centres are not necessarily to be linked... becuause although a lot of soc.centres are squatted, there are also places like LARC which were bought.

I know it takes a while to "learn the ropes" here, that is to say, to understand how wikipedia works on the inside, if i can be of any help, please let me know on my talk page.

happy editing! Mujinga 19:34, 10 October 2006 (UTC)

thanks for your message, if you need help with grammar for articles on specific squats then maybe i can help - i am a native english speaker. Mujinga 21:48, 10 October 2006 (UTC)

Squats[edit]

The UK article was deleted through due process. The others that were intended to be included (SP, NL) were not added properly and I was unable to consider them as part of the same debate, hence they have not been deleted but could be nominated in the future.

On an editing note I would point out that lists of this type must be sourced, must conform to WP:NOT and various other list guidelines, and should not contain a mass of redlinks to entities whose notability is not apparently obvious. It may well be that this type of list is not the right way to present information about squats on Wikipedia. Your apparent knowledge on the subject may also stem from original research and it is important you provide sources to show this is not the case. Thanks, Deizio talk 15:22, 14 October 2006 (UTC)

More on squats[edit]

hiya,

please take what im saying in good faith becuase im appreciating the fact that you take time and energy on wikipedia, but i want to point out a few things ....

i think its great that you want to add info about squats, but that info must be verifiable and i think you are new here, so if you are, its best perhaps to take time to understrand how to create pages properly by reading about how to do it and studying good pages as templates. the lists of squats in different countries will now probably all get deleted, which is a shame, unless you can provide reliable sources and references. was your plan to slowly add pages on individual squats? thats what my plan is for the netherlands and then i guess when there are enough pages in the notable squat section in the squatting page then i can expand back to Squats in The Netherlands. as i said before, ask me if you need help im happy to oblige. or ask a question somewhere.

i saw the page you created on Metelkova ... you just ripped it from their webpage here which is totally against wikipedia policy and you must know that. yes there are wikipolice, i know i know, but there are rules which should be obeyed!!

if you make a blue link, you should make sure the link actually goes to what you want it to go to ... as i went through the lists of squats i followed lots of blue link which didnt go to the right place. eg Città di Castello

oh and a final thing, you always have the minor edit box ticked? you should only have that ticked when making a very small insignificant edit .. like fixing a spelling error. check your edit list to see what i mean.

cheers, Mujinga 22:38, 14 October 2006 (UTC)


ok, thats interesting, it was a bit vague here, where it said:
"In 2006, the Inspectorate for the Environment unsuccessfully tried to carry out the demolition of Metelkova, but was prevented each time by the physical yet non-violent intervention of people at Metelkova itself. On 2nd August, however, the Inspectorate nonetheless succeded in its intentions, and with the help of a large number of police who cordoned off the relevant site. Nonetheless, later in the same time, the various users of Metelkova decided to build a new school in place of the the old one. This will not be renamed the Small school. Rather, we want to show that we have politically as well as culturally grown and developed in all these years. Therefore instead of a “Small school” we shall build a “Primary school”. The autonomy that therefore crucially defines the creativity Metelkova continues regardless. "
If you wanna change it (you could just change it to saying the school was demolished) then go ahead. BUT remember you must give REFERENCES (and sorry but in english is best for the english wikipedia!). I'm tired now, I will probably go sleep, but i will check tomorrow what you did or if you want leave me a note go ahead. Or we could discuss it on the article's talk page here. Cheers and happy editing Mujinga 01:23, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

tommyhaus[edit]

www.tommyhaus.org - the second squat in berlin/germany after the rauchhaus. there is an video cd here about squats and about the house. also contact us for gmm, please install psi, http://psi.sf.net/ - tribble(At)jabber.ccc.de greetings,xx —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 212.202.174.133 (talk) 02:45, 7 March 2007 (UTC).

Multilingual WeedWiki[edit]

Hi. I informed a Wikia.com admin of your request for help at the WeedWiki portal:

The Wikia.com admin, Chadlupkes, responded to your question there. He can also be reached at one of his user talk pages:

There are other free wiki hosts that you might also use. See a list here:

I help edit this page:

Replaceable fair use Image:Antonio_Negri.gif[edit]

Replaceable fair use
Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Antonio_Negri.gif. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 7 days after this notification, per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MER-C 09:19, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

Onuphrius[edit]

Hello Mladifilozof, I see you appreciate hermits and Christian history. Have you a calling to the eremitic life yourself perhaps? Mir. Jc3schmi (talk)

I am a Catholic hermit brother in Canada. You might find Jan Tyranowski an interesting character. Be Blessed this Easter season. I believe Orthodox Lent is beginning. Mir. Jc3schmi (talk) 21:29, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

Image:Alkoholiada.jpg listed for deletion[edit]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Alkoholiada.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Kelly hi! 16:30, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

Theodoras[edit]

I noticed that you recently renamed an article on a Byzantine empress as Theodora II. I was not aware of numerals assigned to the ,often overlooked, empresses consort. However I have been working on the articles on the Byzantine empresses for some time and the numbering struck me as overlooking several of them. In chronological order we have:

The wife of Theophilus was the third empress of that name out of seven in total. Any historical work assigning ordinals to them? Dimadick (talk) 14:23, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

An Uncondemning Monk[edit]

Young Philosophe, you should check An Uncondemning Monk out. Mir.Jc3schmi (talk) 00:34, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

Please, you could help the articles: sh:Martin Weinek and sh:Kaspar Capparoni, and to translate them in Serb and Bosnian?[edit]

Good morning to you, Greetings from Campora San Giovanni. I write you regarding the articles that I have signalled you. Two actors of a note concern police television series: Inspector Rex, now thanks to Rai International it will be possible to see in 150 countries within the winter 2008. Weinek (pronounced Vaynek) is the veteran of the Austrian series, now fixed member of that intenazionale. He is also an excellent wine-grower and agricultural entrepreneur. Capparoni is the new entry of the series, but he has already worked in famous international productions and with directors famous, I also quote Dario Argento. Naturlamente if you will help me in this, I will reciprocate the favor translating in Italian, French and Sicilian: a biography or a geographical article. This in how much on the Italian edition and Sicilian they are biographer and geographer. In attends him of one certain answer of yours of I thank in advance. I also send you the regards from Campora San Giovanni, my village native, with the wish that you can come us to find! Thanks still for the patience and the understanding.--Lodewijk Vadacchino (talk) 10:35, 22 September 2008 (UTC)

Is it all right, but cannot you do something in more? Helping the article in Serbo-Croatian and writing something in Cyrillic Serb? Weinek becomes Vaynek as translitterazione. For the Serb the Cyrillic one is all right. Then I translate you as promised biographies and geographical articles to your liking. Scout's word!--Lodewijk Vadacchino (talk) 13:13, 22 September 2008 (UTC)

Solitary life[edit]

Mladifiozof I thought you might find this of interest. Mir. Jc3schmi (talk) 'Fireworks on two legs': Priest shares faith with Belgrade Catholics

By Victor Gaetan Catholic News Service

BELGRADE, Serbia (CNS) -- In Serbia, it's rare to meet a Serbian Catholic. The vast majority of Serbs are Orthodox, and the 8,000-member Roman Catholic community in Belgrade includes mostly ethnic minorities such as Croats or Hungarians.

So it is doubly rare to meet a Serb who is also a Catholic priest.

Father Aleksandar Ninkovic, 45, serves at Belgrade's Church of the Assumption of the Blessed Virgin Mary. But less than 20 years ago Father Ninkovic was a military officer, leading a technical support team at a Yugoslav helicopter base.

"I was an atheist, a communist military officer," said the enthusiastic, bearded priest, a bear of a man who resembles the sympathetic giant, Hagrid, in the Harry Potter film series. "Although I was baptized in the Orthodox church, as most everyone in Serbia is, I had no faith."

Father Ninkovic provides pastoral care to a sizable community of foreign Catholics living in Belgrade. He also plays the keyboard in a jazz duo, paints icons and sets up computer networks for fellow priests. His shares the rectory with his German shepherd puppy, Ola.

The priest spoke about his journey of faith with Catholic News Service.

After concluding that communism makes no sense because no man is perfect and all people experience greed, he said he came to the powerful realization that God exists.

"I was always fond of reading spiritual books, but in the military I had an unusual experience. I was left alone in some military buildings for several weeks while my friends were on a mission. No one was around," he recalled.

"And I developed a great fear of being alone. I had the feeling that I would live forever, with nothing to do, in boredom. This idea gave me tremendous power because I realized it was a picture of hell," he said.

"If you don't live with God you live by yourself, which is terrible. It's hell," Father Ninkovic added.

He left the army in 1989, eventually opening an information technology firm -- all the time searching for how to worship the God he knew exists. His younger brother was then considering Catholicism and took him to a Franciscan monastery outside Belgrade.

"I started reading books from the Franciscans and going to Mass. I was lazy on Sundays, normally, but suddenly I was waking up at 6 a.m. to get to church. My parents were astonished. Slowly, through God's mercy, they started to practice the faith, too," Father Ninkovic said, smiling.

In 1994 he decided that God was calling him to the priesthood. Although his bishop recommended study in Italy, a friar told him that people spoke Serbo-Croatian at a seminary in Szeged, Hungary. They did not, so he had to learn Hungarian before starting theological studies.

"I always felt the power of God. I felt like I was a donkey, being pulled by God. I never felt that I could fail despite the difficulty," he said.

Father Ninkovic was ordained in 2002. He did his doctoral studies in Rome and defended his dissertation there in early October. During his studies, he maintained ties to Belgrade by serving each summer as a spiritual helper in his current parish.

"I try to share my experience of faith with others," he said. "I am lucky because I am converted. If you live all your life as a Christian, your faith is like drinking water or breathing air. But for those of us who have chosen, it is the most important thing that has happened in our lives. As a convert, I'm like fireworks on two legs.

"I feel belief in my body, like I feel material," he said, cupping a big hand like he is holding something. "Politics, I'm not too much interested in ... except when it is troubling the church."

END

February 2009[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Neradnik has been reverted.

Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): \bmyspace\.com (links: http://www.myspace.com/neradnik).

If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 02:53, 4 February 2009 (UTC)

IMARO article[edit]

Hi! Please, read the added sources, read the added references, read the talk page and then wellcome editing. Jingby (talk) 16:58, 27 May 2009 (UTC)

Reply[edit]

You have a reply on User talk:Anna Comnena. —Anna Comnena (talk) 09:09, 15 October 2009 (UTC)


File copyright problem with File:Racak massacre.jpg[edit]

File Copyright problem
File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Racak massacre.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. FASTILY (TALK) 23:00, 17 October 2009 (UTC)

Српске државе 1371-89[edit]

Поздрав,

видим да си у задње време овде писао о земљама насталим после распада Урошеве империје под управом српских великаша.

Веома ме занима то доба, па бих те питао: Да ли смем те твоје чланке да преведем на српски језик и да употребим карте које си недавно послао на Оставу?

С поштовањем, --79.101.251.150 (talk) 21:28, 16 November 2009 (UTC)

Pa naravno, čim su na Vikipediji, mogu se slobodno koristiti. Pozdrav!--Mladifilozof (talk) 22:18, 16 November 2009 (UTC)

Kosovo massacres[edit]

Hello! Please do not remove sourced materials from the article Kosovo massacres. "Article topic" is not an argument to remove massacres against Serbs, as such an article can not describe all massacres in Kosovo to be solely against Albanians. Thanks, --Cinéma C 21:03, 27 December 2009 (UTC)

You shouldn't have moved the article to War crimes in Kosovo War as the article War crimes in Kosovo already exists. Such moves should be made in consultation with other editors, especially when an editor is currently involved with a particular article. I do not appreciate you taking unilateral actions and not answering my messages. --Cinéma C 21:10, 27 December 2009 (UTC)
You can't just paste the text to Kosovo massacres from Massacres in Kosovo, it erases the history! Please do it right, request an administrator to move Massacres in Kosovo back to Kosovo massacres. --Cinéma C 21:31, 27 December 2009 (UTC)
Well, now we have:


All of those should be placed in one good article. Those three are
1. Unnecessary separated.
2. Non NPOV.
3. Almost the same!
4. Disputed in content.
5. ...
I am asking how should we fix those? I recommend one big merge, into War crimes in Kosovo, so we can have one good article about this subject. Massacres of Albanians in the Kosovo War‎‎ is completely disputed, article name included. Tadija (talk) 09:46, 30 December 2009 (UTC)

I think Tadija is correct here, these articles have been split up without a particularly good reason, and as a result of that have become POV forks. Its seems to me that there is not so much content there as to preclude a merge to a single article (as they had been before). Thoughts? Prodego talk 17:11, 30 December 2009 (UTC)

You certainly weren't forced to create a POV fork. But that is in the past now, why don't you start a discussion about what should be included on the article talk page, and discuss it with Tadija and other involved editors? Prodego talk 17:39, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
Even if it is completely neutral (and it does appear to be pretty neutral), it is still a POV fork if you made it because you wanted a different POV then was in the main article. (Even if the main article was not neutral, and you wanted a neutral point of view). So what we need to do is clean up these split up articles in to a more logical structuring, and ensure the resulting pages are neutral. Prodego talk 17:45, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
Why are you answering on Prodego's page? We are talking here? I am asking from you to copy your discussion here. so we can have continuity. Instead of your persuasion, what can you propose as compromise from your side? That is only way of talking usefully. Tadija (talk) 09:50, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
Hello, Mladifilozof. You have new messages at Tadija's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

English Wikipedia[edit]

I noticed that you have posted comments in a language other than English. When on the English-language Wikipedia, please always use English, no matter to whom you address your comments. This is so that comments may be comprehensible to the community at large. If the use of another language is unavoidable, please provide a translation of the comments. For more details, see Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines. Thank you. It is a mistake to think that communications in English Wikipedia are private conversations. JamesBWatson (talk) 16:41, 4 January 2010 (UTC)

Who´s the vandal here?[edit]

I´ve asked you to stop your political agenda. You should be ashemed about the thing you´ve said. If you did something in the past so you feel you need redemption, that doesn´t include the entire nation nor it´s history. Stop laying about the Serbian history, be carefull. FkpCascais (talk) 22:20, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

I think you are very good at sports pages FkpCascais. Considering my ban from Kosovo topics, I would remind Mladifilozof of another disruptiv and vandalistic removal of yours here [1]where you call the Institute of History of Kosovo an unreliable source. That page is copyrighted 1997 btw.sulmues (talk) --Sulmues 20:10, 21 January 2010 (UTC)

January 2010[edit]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Kingdom of Serbia. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. Momo san Gespräch 22:26, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

Edit warring at Kingdom of Serbia[edit]

It appears you have reverted at least seven times on 10 January at Kingdom of Serbia. Needless to say, this violates the WP:3RR rule, which only permits up to three reverts in 24 hours. You may answer the complaint about your edits at WP:AN3#User:Mladifilozof reported by User:Tadija (Result: ). Admins are authorized to block editors from Wikipedia if they go over 3RR, so please explain how you will behave better in the future. EdJohnston (talk) 23:15, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

Thanks, but to avoid action by another admin, you should respond at WP:AN3#User:Mladifilozof reported by User:Tadija (Result: ) and promise that you will stop edit warring. EdJohnston (talk) 23:38, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

WP:DIGWUREN notice[edit]

The warring at Kingdom of Serbia has been stopped due to full protection of the article, which was applied by another admin. I must warn you that your edits of January 10 would abundantly justify blocking you for 3RR for 48 hours. Since the violation looks stale at present, I will not be taking action on it, but the case remains open at WP:AN3. Other editors have claimed that you are pushing an ethnic POV with your changes at Kingdom of Serbia. Though I've not looked into that, I must alert you that the WP:DIGWUREN Arbcom case provides sanctions against ethnic disputes on articles concerning Eastern Europe. If you plan to continue editing at Kingdom of Serbia, you are strongly advised to limit yourself to one revert per day, and to follow WP:Dispute resolution if you encounter any disagreements. EdJohnston (talk) 17:10, 12 January 2010 (UTC)

Greater Serbia[edit]

Hello Mladifilozof. If you wish to go back to "improve" the article by adding references to the various atrocities which the Serbian nation is accused of committing, can you do so without removing the information already there please, I'd appreciate that. For example, the lede includes an introduction to the ideology itself which I myself helped shape quite some time ago. Suddenly I looked at the article and it had all gone, and was replaced by text which was more demafatory to ordinary Serbs than telling of the actual events. If you could add detail instead of remove and replace, you may find less opposition. Thanks. Evlekis (talk) 23:02, 17 January 2010 (UTC)

Mainly the following which was part of the lede:
  • The postulated borders for the proposed state incorporate one vast and continuous stretch of land across southeastern Europe. Each region is included for a minimum of one of three reasons: firstly, the land may occupy a region where the Serbs originally settled upon arrival in the Balkans (e.g. Šumadija or Montenegro); secondly, the land may once have been controlled by the medieval Serbian empires after expansion (e.g. the present-day regions of the Preševo Valley or the Republic of Macedonia); and thirdly, the land is where numerous Serbs later may later have settled having escaped onslaughts (e.g. present-day Vojvodina or Eastern Slavonia). The primary aim would be to unite all Serbs and Serbian lands in one state and this in its radical form is interpreted as including areas where Serbs are merely a significant minority, as well as where there has been no continuous Serbian presence down the centuries.

If you want to do a full revert, atleast take out some of the direct references to the wartime atrocities committed by Serb forces. It is not because I am in denial or I question the sources but because the article should be about the ideology and not the past 150 years' activities. Thanks for asking. Evlekis (talk) 23:20, 17 January 2010 (UTC)


Yes your translation is accurate. It conveys the message from the above text in Serbian. I do apologise Mladifilozof but I did think that you were actually Serbian. I thought you declared yourself Serbian on your userpage. Perhaps I was mistaken!! Evlekis (talk) 14:43, 18 January 2010 (UTC)

You have my apologies. I thought you were struggling with the Serbian.
Here is how I would translate the text:

So I say: if a Great (ie. not Greater) Serbia should be held by committing crime, I would never accept it; may Great Serbia disappear, but to hold it by crime - no. If it were necessary to hold only a small Serbia by crime, I would not accept it. May small Serbia disappear, but to hold it by crime - no. And if there is only one Serb, and if I am that last Serb, to hold on by crime - I do not accept. May we disappear, but disappear as humans, because then we will not disappear, we will be alive in the hands of the living God.

Very difficult to give a literal translation. This maintains the message without too much modification. Evlekis (talk) 15:04, 18 January 2010 (UTC)

"Greater" is a standard rendering in these instances where a larger entity including a smaller entity is referred to - for example "Greater London". Without the comparative ending the adjective is little more than a salutation. Opbeith (talk) 10:03, 14 February 2010 (UTC)

Edit war at Dimitrije Tucović[edit]

Note the page is protected due to the content dispute. Please work with the other editor on the talk page of the article to come to consensus to resort the conflict. Once you've come to a solution let us know here to completely unprotect the article, or here to make a single series of changes without complete unprotection (should there be a few outstanding issues). If discussion on talk pages proves difficult, please review the guidance at WP:DR. Thanks, NJA (t/c) 13:42, 19 January 2010 (UTC)

Greater Albania[edit]

Hello and thank you for your edits on Albanian related topics. Your contribution is very appreciated. You might consider placing this map [2], which is Greater Albania as proposed by Albanian nationalists (which is what is presented in the article), rather than this [3], which is work of the greek wikipedians. sulmues (talk)--Sulmues 18:19, 20 January 2010 (UTC)

Your contributed article, Colonisation of Kosovo[edit]

Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, Colonisation of Kosovo. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as yourself. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - History of Kosovo. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will to continue helping improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at History of Kosovo - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Tadija (talk) 20:16, 21 January 2010 (UTC)

POV Editing[edit]

It is not question of pages where file is, it is only one image! That image is not encyclopedic, per all reasons explained here ([4]). Stop that hatred and POV pushing, and try to talk to me, and to fix all problematic edits! Without redeeming to God! --Tadija (talk) 15:47, 22 February 2010 (UTC)

OK, i sent you e-mail... --Tadija (talk)

March 2010[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. A contribution you made to Massacres of Albanians in the Kosovo War appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe this important core policy. Thank you. Tadija (talk) 19:35, 12 March 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:NYtimes1912.jpg[edit]

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:NYtimes1912.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore will not be able to answer your questions.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used once again.
  • If you recieved this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to somewhere on your talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 12:27, 13 March 2010 (UTC)

Your contributed article, Serbian propaganda during Yugoslav Wars[edit]

Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, Serbian propaganda during Yugoslav Wars. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as yourself. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - Role of Serbian media in the Yugoslav Wars. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will to continue helping improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Role of Serbian media in the Yugoslav Wars - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Tadija (talk) 21:39, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

Your contributed article, Serbia in the Yugoslav Wars[edit]

Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, Serbia in the Yugoslav Wars. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as yourself. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - Serbia and Montenegro. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will to continue helping improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Serbia and Montenegro - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Tadija (talk) 14:18, 21 March 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Serbian propaganda in the Yugoslav Wars[edit]

A tag has been placed on Serbian propaganda in the Yugoslav Wars, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Tadija (talk) 19:07, 21 March 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Serbian propaganda in the Yugoslav Wars[edit]

A tag has been placed on Serbian propaganda in the Yugoslav Wars, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Tadija (talk) 19:20, 21 March 2010 (UTC)


File permission problem with File:Milosevic-1.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Milosevic-1.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Mnidza (talk) 02:51, 26 March 2010 (UTC)

Serbian campaign in Albania (Balkan Wars)[edit]

Thanks for writing this article and citing it so thoroughly! Please let me know if I can help you out with any other Balkans-related articles. Kenji Yamada (talk) 03:36, 26 March 2010 (UTC)

Cham Genocide[edit]

Hello Mladi! I was wondering if you would have the time to write on a new article, called the Cham Genocide which occurred in 1944-1945. Since you are a political analyst, I can't think of a better person to start that article. You can see Cham Albanians to start with. Thank you for all your invaluable contributions. Regards! --sulmues (talk) 14:36, 27 March 2010 (UTC)

Report[edit]

User:Athenean has mentioned and accused you here [5], so you may want to respond.--— ZjarriRrethues — talk 11:02, 28 March 2010 (UTC)

Serbian propaganda[edit]

If you dont stop with your highly POV edits, and if you dont stop creating redirects to the Serbian propaganda, i will ask for arbitration. You know that your articles are not neutral, and when we agree on that, you stop commenting. Please, last time, stop. --Tadijataking 22:16, 1 April 2010 (UTC)

CfD nomination of Category:Serbian propaganda[edit]

I have nominated Category:Serbian propaganda (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Tadijataking 22:49, 1 April 2010 (UTC)

Way to go[edit]

Young philosopher you had the courage to tackle the most sensitive subjects of recent Serbian history...Hat down for that, you are minority but keep on going... Shanticm (talk) 02:57, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

Damjan Pavlica[edit]

23.6.1979 http://www.myspace.com/mladifilozof Resnik —Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.189.244.241 (talk) 13:56, 8 April 2010 (UTC)

Srebrenica Genocide/Massacre[edit]

Hello Mladifilozof. Thanks for contributing to the Srebrenica Genocide article, as I believe it should rightly be called, though at the moment further argument is a bit of a waste of energy given the determined opposition of certain other editors. I've been feeling a bit isolated there recently since Bosniak got himself banned.

At the right time the images you've just been posting would be more than appropriate and the article could do with more pictures. However at the moment the article is very large and until the text problems have been sorted out I think it's better not to risk having to engage in more discussions about the size issue by adding images. Also be careful - unless all the copyright issues are sorted out, arguments over the technical legitimacy of including a particular image are a cause of more wasted time (as I suspect the people starting the argument have often been well aware).

I've given up at Bosnian Genocide to concentrate on the Srebrenica Genocide article. PBS is resolute in narrowing down the article to his legalistic view. I don't really understand his position. Some of his logic is quite reasonable, sometimes he seems quite ignorant. But it his determination to keep the focus of the article so limited that puzzles me. Anyhow, there's no way left of responding to him productively, not until the Karadzic trial has progressed a bit further.

So that said as far as my own position is concerned, if you have any dispute over a particular issue there and you want me to contribute my thoughts, don't hesitate to draw the point to my attention. Opbeith (talk) 08:39, 11 April 2010 (UTC)

I don't know whether to thank you for putting the images of Milan Likic at the two articles, or feel sick at the thought of having to see him whenever I go back to either of those articles. Both. Thanks for your offer - and don't be held back by concern about your English. As far as I'm concerned, grammar and spelling can be corrected, it's the spirit of some editors that's the problem! If at any time you want to send anything important to me to check through for you, you can e-mail me via my user page. Opbeith (talk) 21:08, 12 April 2010 (UTC)

Hallo Mladi.! Nice job on creating a map about Albanian occupation. I've noticed that the Greek occupation zone is somewhat wrong, according to this [[6]] the blue territory (Valona) was under the control of the provisional government of Albania from 1913.Alexikoua (talk) 05:00, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

Hello Mladifilozof. I went back on one of my sporadic visits to Bosnian Genocide and am in yet another "banging-my-head-against-a-brick-wall" dialogues with PBS about the article he wants it to be. I don't think there's much chance of making headway against him, he responds like a moving target. Life's too short, there are other articles to spend the time more profitably on.

But I have thought about suggesting a disambiguation - PBS can make "Bosnian Genocide" the sort of article he thinks it should be, about the legal status of that expression. At the moment it has been combined with "Genocide in Bosnia and Herzegovina" which redirects to "Bosnian Genocide". I think the only sane way of resolving the issue may be to suggest that the two are separated again and "Genocide in BiH" is used as an article about the various issues while "Bosnian Genocide" stays as PBS wants it, as an article about the expression, even if in its current form it's fundamentally inaccurate. Opbeith (talk) 21:13, 7 August 2010 (UTC)

Operation Horseshoe[edit]

Hello. In March you added a citation to a book from the "Webster's Quotations, Facts and Phrases" series published by Icon Group International to this article. Unfortunately, Icon Group International is not a reliable source - their books are computer-generated, with most of the text copied from Wikipedia (most entries have [WP] by them to indicate this, see e.g. [7]). I've only removed the reference, not the text it was referencing. I'm removing a lot of similar references as they are circular references; many other editors have also been duped by these sources. Despite giving an appearance of reliability, the name "Webster's" has been public domain since the late 19th century. Another publisher to be wary of as they reuse Wikipedia articles is Alphascript Publishing. Fences&Windows 20:32, 25 July 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Serbian war crimes for deletion[edit]

A discussion has begun about whether the article Serbian war crimes, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Serbian war crimes until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Athenean (talk) 01:53, 19 October 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Politika-vukovar-slobodan.jpg[edit]

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Politika-vukovar-slobodan.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 08:17, 7 January 2011 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Mladifilozof/archive1&oldid=1142410656"