User:Msteg01/sandbox
| Submission declined on 5 January 2024 by Seawolf35 (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
|  |
| Submission declined on 5 January 2024 by Qcne (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. Declined by Qcne 4 months ago. | |
The Representative Party: Advocating for Inclusive Governance Inspired by Ancient Philosophy[edit]
In a political landscape shaped by ideologies and partisan divides, the Representative Party emerges as a beacon of inclusivity, drawing inspiration from the profound philosophical thoughts of ancient luminaries Plato and Socrates. Founded in the United States, specifically in New Jersey, this party stands firmly on the principle that a just and fair society respects all concerns, ensuring that every voice is not just heard but heeded at all levels of governance.
- Burnyeat, Myles and Michael Frede, 2015[1]
At its core, the Representative Party finds its philosophical roots in the ideals of Plato and Socrates, whose timeless wisdom emphasized the significance of individual interactions in shaping a society's character. Building upon this philosophy, the party champions the concept of representation, viewing it as the cornerstone of a happier and more equitable society. Their mission is clear: to provide representation across state, local, and national levels of government, fostering an environment where every individual's concerns hold weight.
- Ebrey, David and Richard Kraut (eds.), 2022[2]
- Cooper, John M. (ed.), 1997, Plato: Complete Works, Indianapolis: Hackett.[3]
However, the party's stance diverges from the conventional notion of the "Rule of the Majority" pervasive in democratic systems. In alignment with the objections raised by Plato and Socrates, the Representative Party steers away from a governance structure where the concerns of a numerical majority overshadow those of smaller segments of the population. Instead, their focus lies on the respectful consideration of all concerns, regardless of numerical advantage. This principled approach seeks to mitigate the risk of marginalizing the needs and perspectives of significant sections of society.
lPoitical Romanticism (1919)[4]
Dictatorship. From the Origin of the Modern Concept of Sovereignty to Proletarian Class Struggle (1921), trans. by M. Hoelzl and G. Ward, Cambridge: Polity Press, 2014.[5]
Anchored in common concerns that garner widespread support, the party's platform is a testament to their commitment to amplifying the voices of the people. By aligning their goals with commonly shared interests, the Representative Party strives to create policies that resonate deeply with the populace. Their ultimate aim is to foster a society where inclusivity and fairness reign, transcending the potential tyranny of the majority. Political Theology. Four Chapters on the Concept of Sovereignty (1922), trans. by G. Schwab, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2005.[6]
“The Age of Neutralizations and Depoliticizations” (1929), in C. Schmitt, The Concept of the Political. Expanded Edition, trans. by G. Schwab, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2007, pp. 80–96.[7]
The essence of the Representative Party's ethos extends beyond rhetoric; it permeates their approach to governance and policymaking. Embracing diverse perspectives, they ensure that decision-making processes are inclusive and reflective of the multifaceted nature of society. Every voice is not just acknowledged but actively integrated into shaping the policies that shape the nation.
Contemporary legal theories focus on two primary aspects concerning the nature of law. Firstly, they explore the conditions that validate a norm's legality, examining whether its source or content dictates its legitimacy. Secondly, they delve into the normative dimension, aiming to explain how legal norms generate reasons for action and whether there's a moral obligation to comply with them.
Legal philosophy distinguishes between explaining what makes a law valid and justifying its moral legitimacy and the reasons for compliance. However, some contemporary scholars question whether it's feasible to separate these aspects of law's normativity. This ongoing debate underscores the intricate relationship between the foundation of legal validity and the moral obligations guiding adherence to the law.
Augustine, De Libero Arbitrio, I, 5; see also Aquinas, Summa Theologica, I-II, Q. 96, Art. 4.)[8]
As the political landscape evolves, the Representative Party stands as a testament to the enduring wisdom of ancient philosophy. Their dedication to inclusive governance, shaped by the ideals of Plato and Socrates, serves as a guiding light in a world where respect for all concerns forms the bedrock of a just society.
References[edit]
- Griswold, Charles L. (ed.), 1988, Platonic Writings, Platonic Readings, London: Routledge.
- Guthrie, W.K.C., 1971, Socrates, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- –––, 1975, A History of Greek Philosophy, Volume 4, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- –––, 1978, A History of Greek Philosophy, Volume 5, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Burnyeat, Myles and Michael Frede, 2015, The Pseudo-Platonic Seventh Letter, Dominic Scott (ed.), Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Ebrey, David and Richard Kraut (eds.), 2022, The Cambridge Companion to Plato, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Cooper, John M. (ed.), 1997, Plato: Complete Works, Indianapolis: Hackett. (Contains translations of all the works handed down from antiquity with attribution to Plato, some of which are universally agreed to be spurious, with explanatory footnotes and both a general Introduction to the study of the dialogues and individual Introductory Notes to each work translated.)
- Political Romanticism (1919), trans. by Guy Oakes, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1986.
- Dictatorship. From the Origin of the Modern Concept of Sovereignty to Proletarian Class Struggle (1921), trans. by M. Hoelzl and G. Ward, Cambridge: Polity Press, 2014.[5]
- Political Theology. Four Chapters on the Concept of Sovereignty (1922), trans. by G. Schwab, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2005.[6]
- “The Age of Neutralizations and Depoliticizations” (1929), in C. Schmitt, The Concept of the Political. Expanded Edition, trans. by G. Schwab, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2007, pp. 80–96.[7]
- Augustine, De Libero Arbitrio, I, 5; see also Aquinas, Summa Theologica, I-II, Q. 96, Art. 4.)[8]
- ^ Szlezák, Thomas Alexander (2017). "Myles Burnyeat, Michael Frede: The Pseudo-Platonic Seventh Letter". Gnomon. 89 (4): 311–323. doi:10.17104/0017-1417-2017-4-311. ISSN 0017-1417.
- ^ Ebrey, David; Kraut, Richard, eds. (2022-07-21). "The Cambridge Companion to Plato". doi:10.1017/9781108557795.
{{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires|journal=(help) - ^ Palmer, John A. (1998-10). "J. M. Cooper(ed.), D. S. Hutchinson(assoc. ed.): Plato: Complete Works: edited with introduction and notes. Pp. xxx + 1808. Indianapolis, and Cambridge: Hackett Publishing, 1997. ISBN: 0-87220-349-2". The Classical Review. 48 (2): 482–482. doi:10.1017/s0009840x98410035. ISSN 0009-840X.
{{cite journal}}: Check date values in:|date=(help) - ^ Wright, Richardson (1919). "The Return to Romanticism". Art & Life. 11 (6): 336. doi:10.2307/20543116. ISSN 2150-5969.
- ^ a b Fusco, Gian Giacomo (2016-07). "Carl Schmitt, Dictatorship. From the Origin of the Modern Concept of Sovereignty to the Proletarian Class Struggle, translated by Michael Hoelzl and Graham Ward, Cambridge: Polity Press, 2014, 314 pp, pb £17.99". The Modern Law Review. 79 (4): 738–742. doi:10.1111/1468-2230.12210. ISSN 0026-7961.
{{cite journal}}: Check date values in:|date=(help); no-break space character in|title=at position 5 (help) - ^ a b Schmitt, Carl; Schwab, George; Strong, Tracy B. (2005). Political Theology. University of Chicago Press. ISBN 978-0-226-73889-5.
- ^ a b Schmitt, C. (1993-07-01). "The Age of Neutralizations and Depoliticizations(1929)". Telos. 1993 (96): 130–142. doi:10.3817/0693096130. ISSN 0090-6514.
- ^ a b Márquez Domínguez, Guadalupe (2017-05-25). "Nota crítica sobre el libre albedrío en De Libero Arbitrio, Liber II de San Agustín. Critical Note on Free Will In De Libero Arbitrio, Liber II of Saint Augustine". Metafísica y persona (16). doi:10.24310/metyper.2016.v0i16.2699. ISSN 1989-4996.