User:Oshwah/TalkPageArchives/2015-1

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


You are currently viewing an archive of Oshwah's user talk page from January - June 2015. Please do not modify this page.

These discussions are no longer active and were moved here for historical and record-keeping purposes. If you need to respond to a discussion from here, please create a new discussion on my user talk page and with a link to the archived discussion here so I can easily follow, and we'll be able to pick up where we left off no problem.


Were you trying to send me a message? No worries. Just click here to go the correct page.



can you creat me a page please  ?

can you creat me a page please  ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.251.10.175 (talk) 23:40, 1 January 2015 (UTC)

You're more than welcome to create an article yourself (provided that it's within policy) - Just create an account. You should read and understand this before you create your first article - it should help you with anything you need. Good luck! ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 23:45, 1 January 2015 (UTC)

Why was my article about pehli nazar mein not accepted? 

Prasiddha kc (talk) 12:21, 24 July 2015 (UTC)

Why was my article about pehli nazar mein not accepted? 

Prasiddha kc (talk) 12:21, 24 July 2015 (UTC)

About network solutions

check out the Gary Kremen page or Sex.Com page — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.217.102.104 (talk) 01:14, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

The reversion I made was due to having no source provided with the content you added. All you need to do is provide a reliable source with your edit, and you're good to go. See Wikipedia's policies on verifiability (specifically providing a reliable source) if you need help. ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 01:21, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

Port Orford, Oregon

Hi Oshwah,

I think maybe I made a mistake (I've never edited a wikipedia page before). I wanted to add Eli Clare under Notable Residents. Eli is a queer and disability justice activist who is from Port Orford. He also has a wikipedia page that I was trying to link to: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eli_Clare

Good afternoon to you! The fact that you were bold and edited an article is perfectly fine. We encourage you to be bold and we generally welcome you to edit. However, the reason that I reverted your particular edit was due to your word usage of "is a queer" in the edit. This introduces both neutral point of view and biography of living persons violations, as that word is prejorative and is not the reason in which that person is notable. Under Wikipedia's biography of living persons policy alone, any edit that violates it must be immediately removed, which is what I did. "Eli is a disability justice activist who is from Port Orford." is a considerable alternative to the original edit. ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 20:05, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

Grimmtastic Girls

I don't mean to be rude, but can you please stop deleting the edits I make to the Grimmtastic Girls wiki page? I'm trying to expand it and make it better. I know my edits might not look finished, but I promise you I will finish them. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Scarlet Yineala (talk • contribs) 04:57, 17 January 2015 (UTC)

Hi Scarlet Yineala. Please accept my humble apologies. I think my reversion was the result of pressing the wrong button. Please feel free to undo my edit, and do not hesitate to let me know if I can assist you with anything. Happy editing! ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 06:24, 18 January 2015 (UTC)

Dealing with CAT:SHADOW

Hi! When moving a file which shadows Commons, please follow these steps:

  • After moving the file, remember to remove the {{ShadowsCommons}} template from the file information page. You forgot to do this with at least File:Razvilka Old Square.jpg.
  • After moving the file, remember to update all file links. You forgot to do this with at least File:Electron Transport Chain.png.
  • After moving the file, remember to nominate the redirect for speedy deletion. Otherwise, we have a redirect which continues to shadow Commons.
  • Avoid moving files listed for deletion. When you moved File:Electron Transport Chain.png, a bot updated the section header automatically, but various other links in the deletion discussion still refer to the old file name. Also, the section link on the uploader's talk page still refers to the old file name. If the file ends up being deleted, the conflict will be solved anyway. --Stefan2 (talk) 21:05, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
Hi, Stefan2. Please accept my apologies. I messaged you on your talk page asking if I'm doing something wrong with the WP:FMV process and I didn't realize that you had already left me this message here! I guess it's just one of those days :-). I really appreciate that you took the time to extensively point out exactly which steps I am failing to complete with the file moving procedure. I was just approved for the flag yesterday, so I'm still on that learning curve... haha. The directions listed in the WP:FMV/W section didn't seem complete when I was doing some file moving. Maybe I'm missing where the complete and full steps are listed. Again, thank you. I'll go back and fix what you haven't already :-) ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 00:38, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

No Subject

thanks for your message. it's hard to be contructive about someone who was destructive. what he was furthering didn't even make sense. he was using his individualism to make his statements about world government requiring the removal of individualism. that is insanity. how do you speak contructively about an insane person? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:306:C54B:AA10:24C8:231C:E1C6:9609 (talk) 23:57, 30 January 2015 (UTC)

As much as you may dislike some people in the world (past or present), please remember that making these kind of edits is disruptive to Wikipedia and what the websites tries to accomplish. Instead of making edits like that, why not focus on improving articles that you like or have personal interest with? :-) To answer your question: editing constructively and improving Wikipedia involves editing article content in a way that is neutral. ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 00:33, 15 February 2015 (UTC)

Conflict of Interest

Oshwah,

I wanted to inquire about a Wikipedia page for myself (Jon Goode). I read all the conflict of interest and don't feel comfortable doing one of myself. I wasn't sure how to contact an editor. Briefly I have an author of four children's books with sports celebrities.

Pitching with the Papelbons Basketball with Big Baby Danny Woodhead: A Football Dream Come True Not Cool to Bully in School with Milan Lucic

I have created numerous promotions that have been all over the media including the Yankee Elimination promotion, where we eliminated the Yankee team name amongst New England area Little Leagues. It was covered by national media including CNN, ESPN and Steve Rushin did an article on the promotion in Sports Illustrated. It is also featured in college text books across the country. Other promotions include setting the Guinness World Record for the World's Largest Game of Duck, Duck Goose, the first-ever Human Home Run where we shot a human cannonball over the outfield wall and did the Jack Kerouac Bobble Head which was so popular it was accepted into the National Baseball Hall of Fame.

Thank you for considering.

Jon — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.128.211.179 (talk) 03:53, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

First of all, I'm happy that you contacted an editor with your inquiry instead of just creating the article yourself. Creating the article yourself would have been highly discouraged by the community, as it represents a classic conflict of interest between yourself and, well... the article about yourself. When making edits to Wikipedia, please remember that Wikipedia is not a soapbox or means of promotion. Your above message to me came off as promotional within itself; you used the word "promotion" three times in your message when talking about yourself and I had to actually check your contributions to make sure that you weren't a bot :-). Honestly, the best thing to do is to constructively participate in other projects and articles that personally interest you, and let other editors who have no personal ties with you cross this bridge - don't let yourself get involved. Even injecting yourself in discussions about articles in which you have personal involvement with can be seen as a conflict of interest. I don't make any kind of edits or participate in any discussions to articles that involve my place of employment, where I went to college, or any other article that would compromise my ability to edit within a neutral point-of-view. I hope this response sets you in the correct direction and, should you decide to regularly contribute to Wikipedia, that you enjoy your time and remember that everyone's goal (should be) to improve and maintain the encyclopedia. ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 00:33, 15 February 2015 (UTC)

No Subject

Hey Oshwa just wondering what drives you to update such Wikipedia pages such as Aston villa? Are you employed or merely feel the need for correct information? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.170.35.65 (talk) 11:14, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

Why not both? :-) ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 00:33, 15 February 2015 (UTC)

Hi

Hi, I received this message from you:

Hello, I'm Oshwah. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Preimplantation genetic diagnosis without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! ~Oshwah~

The content that I removed does not contribute to the understanding of the article. I removed three lines of direct quotation from a Canadian law, which state, in Canadian legal English, that the use of PGD for sex selection was banned. I replaced it with a reformatting of a short, concise para-phrasal which was already present in the article, and which had made the original quotation redundant before I removed it.

TLDR;

I cut away length without losing meaning. That's article hygiene.

I'm going to go back and in a second and fix that again- I'll try to be more explicit this time when I describe my edit.

Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 186.37.202.232 (talk) 00:49, 26 February 2015 (UTC)

No problem! Please feel free to message me again if you need any help. ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 00:53, 26 February 2015 (UTC)

No Subject

No one uses this shitty site anyway. Need to delete a page because what, your some sort of moderator on a site that most schools wont even allow you to cite. You sir are an absolute ass wipe. Schools tell kids not to use this site because anyone can just edit it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cardsrams (talk • contribs) 01:51, 26 February 2015 (UTC)

No Subject

u know those things that u kept deleting that wasnt me it me it was my sister she was using my computer. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Prodigynicole73 (talk • contribs) 23:42, 4 March 2015 (UTC)

No Subject

dont be stupid — Preceding unsigned comment added by 115.70.233.126 (talk) 23:26, 5 March 2015 (UTC)

Added "Quotes" section

Hi, The reference I linked to contains an audio recording of said statement. It's posted on a website run by his devotees who have tasked themselves to record and archive all his talks, interviews and morningwalk conversations. I don't know what could constitute as a greater "reliable source." Please change it back.

Sincerely 140.180.255.57 (talk) 21:12, 6 March 2015 (UTC)

Diane Noomin

Hi, I am in the middle of working on the page. I am new to editing and am a bit slow. If you could be patient i will add the citations. You may be aware that this weekend is Art+Feminism Wikipedia Edit-A-Thon weekend. There will be hundreds of new people using wikipedia, and they will be slow. Patience is appreciated. Jsm0925 (talk) 00:51, 7 March 2015 (UTC)

Hi Jsm0925, and welcome to Wikipedia! It's awesome that you're here and that you wish to improve it :-)! The reason I reverted your edit to Diane Noomin is because of Wikipedia's Biography of living persons policy. It states that you cannot add any unsourced controversial information to articles of currently living persons. I have an obligation (according to the policy) to revert any such edits to articles on living persons immediately. You need to locate reliable sources to your edits first, then add them as you go. Please read this policy regarding the biography of living persons before you continue editing the article. Please feel free to reach out to me if you have any questions. ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 00:59, 7 March 2015 (UTC)

Why is my site blacklisted ?

I dont have clue why is my site blacklisted at wikipedia ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Isljivo (talk • contribs) 00:25, 8 March 2015 (UTC)

Hi, Isljivo. I don't understand what you mean when you say that your site is blacklisted. Can you elaborate? ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 03:06, 8 March 2015 (UTC)

Hy oshwah why are my pages about NM so sick not forwarded? Prasiddha kc (talk) 11:29, 25 July 2015 (UTC)

deaths of poltergeist film actors

wiki gives one the deaths of the actors on their pages.rubinstein in 2010,,look at her page and the child actor at 12,,try and read their pages please?? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.23.199.116 (talk) 00:40, 8 March 2015 (UTC) I see you deleted my changes again,without a response,you pny have to click on the sctors names to get their details ir does their death on their page need citation too? seems you have been busy on your talk page all night for 10 hours deleting persons alterations,are you a proper wiki representative or just like us,a person tring to help?? orourke died at the age of 12 in 1988 and Rubenstein in 2010 at age of 76? orourke was thought and rumoured to have died through the filming of the poltergeist and put her into shock at the time

Can you tellme where you are from and what part of wiki are you? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.97.103.156 (talk) 10:49, 8 March 2015 (UTC)

ps I ve logged in and never had this problem before,, — Preceding unsigned comment added by Drew270 (talk • contribs) 10:56, 8 March 2015 (UTC)

No Subject

edi wow!!--Jemen06 (talk) 01:16, 8 March 2015 (UTC)puta edi wow°

Changes made to ACE page

Many, MANY apologies for the changes made to the ACE page (by a certain someone who henceforth shall not be getting the password to my computer.) 129.12.135.32 (talk) 01:46, 8 March 2015 (UTC)

Response to delete

Sorry. I just needed help on something in physics and I thought I could ask the creator of that page to supply a more simple definition of work. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Genuine editor 1 (talk • contribs) 01:55, 8 March 2015 (UTC)

why

stop doing this to me — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.202.10.71 (talk) 02:12, 8 March 2015 (UTC)

Nicky, Ricky, Dicky, and Dawn

Hey Oshwah, I saw your message, I actually made List of Nicky, Ricky, Dicky, & Dawn episodes a minute ago. I was gonna put List of episodes on the top area. But I just got the message.

No worries! Happy editing :-) ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 02:32, 8 March 2015 (UTC)

Leslie Shows

I don't believe this article complies with WP:NOTE. Antiv31discuss 02:41, 8 March 2015 (UTC)

Test Antiv31discuss 02:43, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
Hi, Antiv31. Instead of adding that kind of content to the article, you can instead nominate it for articles for deletion or speedy deletion if you feel that it meets the criteria (make sure to read and understand both criteria before you do it). It'll be viewed as constructive as opposed to the edit you made to the article. Also, you should make test edits in the sandbox instead of in other people's talk pages, as you did here. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to ask me them. I'll be happy to assist you. Happy editing! ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 02:53, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
Yes but; I think that the article could actually be constructive, so I don't want CSD it. Antiv31discuss 02:54, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
Hi Antiv31. If you feel that the article can be constructive, and it doesn't meet any criteria for deletion, you can always expand the article with new content and sources :-). I forgot to mention that you're also welcome to add your opinion to the article's talk page. This will allow other editors to discuss it with you and come to a good consensus regarding what to do with it (if anything needs to be done). ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 03:04, 8 March 2015 (UTC)

Last Guardian Edit

Hello Oshwah!

I apologize for not explaining my deletion - I didn't even see that there was a box to explain. Thank you for pointing that out!

I have actually tried to delete this on many occasions. I come back to this page many times in the hopes of finding out new information with regards to this game, one that I'm still hoping sees a release date. And every time I scroll to the bottom, I'm irked by that Kotaku article reference. This tidbit of information tacked on to the end of the Last Guardian article is an opinion and not fact. It does indeed state a few times throughout that it is opinion: "Evan Narcisse for the website Kotaku opined..." and "....reducing the essentialness of the title, according to Narcisse." Even the original article it references is called "Maybe I Don't Need The Last Guardian Anymore." That's all well and fine for you, Mr. Narcisse, but I find this to be out of place on a page that references interviews and articles that reveal FACTS about the progress of the game. Whether or not I agree with what Evan Narcisse is trying to say is irrelevant. The point is that it is his opinion and it doesn't belong here.

What do you think? 74.131.212.230 (talk) 03:14, 8 March 2015 (UTC) Martina

Hi, and thanks for sending me a message! Looking at the history of the article, that content has been removed before, and Martijn Hoekstra put it back. I highly suggest that you add your opinion to the article's talk page in order to draw discussion, and maybe message Martijn Hoekstra and ask him for input, since he was the one who restored it. This will help achieve consensus, which is one of Wikipedia's most important principles. Please let me know if you have any questions or need any assistance. I'll be happy to help. Also, you should make an account if you're going to be making edits! Go here if you want to make one. Either way, welcome to Wikipedia, and enjoy your stay :-) ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 03:28, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
Thanks so much! You've been incredibly helpful. Tanzilliath (talk) 04:05, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
Hi Tanzilliath! I see that you replied with a follow-up question, but removed it shortly afterwards. Did you mean to remove your question? ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 08:03, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
I did have a question, but it seems to have been resolved. Now I have a new one! You said for me to go to the talk page and discuss my opinion in order to find consensus. The talk page has been mostly dead for a year, save for one person, with whom I am now trying to talk with. My question is: how do we form a consensus when it is just the two of us, and we both have wildly different opinions? What is the etiquette here? Especially if I am arguing with the person that wrote the piece I am trying to get removed? Tanzilliath (talk) 08:12, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
Hi Tanzilliath! First of all, it's really great that you're asking these questions and taking the time to learn and understand Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. I really hope that you continue to edit Wikipedia and ask more questions; I think that you'll make an excellent contributor. First of all, be be bold (no joke); don't be afraid to make edits to an article that you feel is right. Just make sure that you provide an explanation in the edit summary when you make changes. This will help explain your thoughts and reasoning to other contributors regarding the edit that you made. For example, take a look at this edit (I think this was you?). There was nothing added to the edit summary, so I restored the content back to the article and let this person know that I didn't understand why they removed it. If you remove content and provide information in the edit summary as to why you did it, you will be fine (just don't violate Wikipedia's three-revert rule). If someone reverts your edit and restores it, simply post your opinion on the talk page of the article, and add a message on that editor's talk page (such as you did to mine today :-) ) and discuss it - mention that you added a discussion to the article's talk page. That editor should be able to logically explain why he/she disagrees with the content removal. You will then be able to discuss it and take the appropriate action that you two agree with - that's consensus! It doesn't matter how many people participate... it matters that you two discuss the disagreement (positively :-) ) and come to an agreement. I hope that this answers your question and that you continue to edit Wikipedia and become a long-term contributor. I welcome you with the most sincere happiness. Please let me know if you have any more questions. ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 08:50, 8 March 2015 (UTC)

Kimba Wood

Controversy section was duplicative am trying to merge with rest of text. 2600:1002:B12A:704D:5510:BEFE:2756:C2BE (talk)< — Preceding undated comment added 08:01, 8 March 2015 (UTC)

re: Justin Westhoff page

hi, I made only a slight alteration to the page in regards to a nickname. I can assure you it is a legitimate name and I am a serious editor. There is no citation that I can give but I would not spend time editing a page unless I am serious.

I hope you can understand.

From Zac — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zac.wilmsy01 (talk • contribs) 08:33, 8 March 2015 (UTC)

Hi, Zac.wilmsy01! Welcome to Wikipedia! It's great that you're here! The reason that I reverted your edit to this article was because of Wikipedia's policies regarding biographies of living persons. Under this policy, editors cannot add any unsourced controversial information to articles of currently living persons. I have an obligation (according to the policy) to revert any such edits to articles on living persons immediately. Please feel free to restore the content back to the article, but you really need to provide a reliable source with your edit. Please let me know if you have any more questions regarding this policy and why I reverted your edit. ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 09:03, 8 March 2015 (UTC)

your message

Hello, I'm Oshwah. I noticed that you recently removed some content from G. M. Durrani with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 09:16, 8 March 2015 (UTC)

my answer for your message

no this was not a mistake. I try to upload a pic of G. M. Durrani. but I failed at that time. so, I will try again next time.

I am so sorry. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.226.98.20 (talk) 09:38, 8 March 2015 (UTC)

Modern Family

Hello, Oshwah. It was indeed a mistake and i apologize. But i thank you for the time you took in order to write me your message.

Sincerely, Swinslokw (talk) 09:32, 8 March 2015 (UTC)Swinslokw.

Hi, Swinslokw! No problem! It's okay to make mistakes. Nobody is perfect :-) ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 09:34, 8 March 2015 (UTC)

No Subject

With regard to my edits on the Ajman international airport page. I work for the company associated with the building and develpoment of the airport and we noticed that the information was inaccurate. Hence i will be editing and posting new content asap. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Npriyan21 (talk • contribs) 10:13, 8 March 2015 (UTC)

Intelligent idiots

I don't know if you noticed it but the reversion you did is by the article creator, who is attempting to write an article about a film he has written himself. Richard Harvey (talk) 11:23, 8 March 2015 (UTC)

Hi Richard Harvey! Thanks for messaging me. First of all, thank you for pointing this out. Second, what? He's editing a film that he wrote? conflict of interest? ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 11:29, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
Yes, plus now reverting your reversion of his reversion of his own editing  ? Checkout the articlle history, which is only a few hours old. Richard Harvey (talk) 11:35, 8 March 2015 (UTC)

A small request

hi, I am Lalit. Sorry that you found it inappropriate. But sir actually its a free method and can be done without the use of any software. request you to please look into it again and pls help me to improve if I am wrong Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lalitlohani 03 (talk • contribs) 16:33, 8 March 2015 (UTC)

thot

ur an thot goodbi — Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.172.174.112 (talk) 17:02, 8 March 2015 (UTC)

How to make my sig red?

I noticed that even through altering my sig through preferences, to make the 'discuss' text red, it only works when I'm actually on the talk page, on other pages it's just normal. Please help! Antiv31discuss 03:53, 10 March 2015 (UTC)

Does this have something to do with the way I arranged my sig? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Antiv31 (talk • contribs) 03:20, 11 March 2015 (UTC)

Hi, Antiv31! Try this: [[User:Antiv31|<span style="color:#C00000">Antiv31</span>]] ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 03:48, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Yeah. I realised now that I was putting the <span> tags outside of the link, instead of inside the pothole text, so it didn't work. It should work now. Antiv31 discuss 06:36, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Hi, Antiv31. Cool, I'm glad you figured it out. Please let me know if you have any more questions. I'll be happy to help! ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 19:29, 11 March 2015 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
Everywhere I look, I see you have reverted vandalism. Keep up the good work. Green Giant (talk) 19:55, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Hi, Green Giant. Thanks for the recognition! It's really great to meet you! ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 02:11, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

What was Wanli blocked for?

Do you know? Antiv31 discuss 21:58, 11 March 2015 (UTC)

Hi, Antiv31. It looks like that user is banned from editing Wikipedia, as it says so on that account's user page and on the banned Wikipedia users category page. It must have happened a very long time ago, as I don't see any discussion pages or block logs for that account (remember that blocks are different than bans). I can't answer as to why that account is banned, but I can tell you that the account is banned. ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 22:48, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
(talk page stalker) Antiv31, the user talk history appears to suggest that Wanli was using Wikipedia as a store for their own files as well as adding large numbers of Google keyword articles. Before 2005 blocks and bans were handled differently, which is why there is nothing in the block log. Green Giant (talk) 11:06, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for the additional input, Green Giant! ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 01:02, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

Sorry

Oshwah, sorry about that I didn't mean to hit any keys it was just a miss click.

Added content so that changes fall under my id

I edited content on the page you modified without signing in, after that i wanted to bring in all changes made by me to the page under my id so i modified it a bit. Ive made changes on top of your revert so i guess everything is in place now. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yeshaskumar88 (talk • contribs) 22:57, 14 March 2015 (UTC)

Hi, Yeshaskumar88. No worries; next time you remove content from an article (such as what you did here), I highly recommend that you provide an edit summary with your edit explaining why you removed the content. This will help other editors to understand your reasoning behind the changes. Please let me know if you have any questions. I'll be happy to help you. Happy editing :-) ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 01:01, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

Regarding my edit of Hersey, MI

Hello. I apologize for any incovenience I may have caused. I often see people advertising their town or certain facets of it in pages about small towns, and that looked like it was happening here, albeit in a smaller amount than some. I should've just taken out the words that made it seem like an opinion, such as, "enjoyed by canoers and tubers," and "one of the best trout streams in the state." My apologies. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jbuc14 (talk • contribs) 23:57, 14 March 2015 (UTC)

Hi Jbuc14, it's a pleasure to meet you! Not a problem; no apologies are needed. Next time you remove content from an article (such as what you did here), I highly recommend that you provide an edit summary with your edit explaining why you removed the content. This will help other editors to understand your reasoning behind the changes. Please let me know if you have any questions. I'll be happy to help you. Happy editing :-) ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 00:04, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

Christ the Redeemer selfie

Can you please revert it as a redirect to Selfie#In popular culture, which already contains the same information? A selfie is not notable for a standalone article, even if it goes viral. Another editor agrees based on the talk page. Lots of other selfies, especially from celebrities have made headlines across the internet, but we are not going to have articles on every single one of them are we? 173.3.77.238 (talk) 00:47, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

Good day to you! Please excuse my reversion; if you feel that this is a legitimate modification to the article, please feel free to revert. ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 01:04, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

Catholic Guilt

Oshwah,

"Catholic Guilt" the page is complete bigiotry and anti-catholic material. I would like to report this page please send me to the right people.

Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.83.107.77 (talk) 00:49, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

Junior Vasquez

All the Junior Vasquez additions to the remixes have full back up on Discogs.com

Why did you delete them? Several I added links to but instead you just reverted back WITHOUT ASKING??

That was very impolite..but peace to you...it's too much work to go back and re-enter all the hard work and research I did.

Maybe next time think through before you just revert or delete? Someone may have done a LOT of work that you simply destroyed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:252:D50:9A90:CABC:C8FF:FEEE:C133 (talk) 01:34, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

Good day to you! Looking at the edit history of Junior Vasquez, I see that you provided sources within the edit summary of some of your previous edits, but didn't add them to the article itself. The edit I saw here didn't have an edit summary provided at all, so I reverted it. Instead of adding your sources to the edit summary, you should add them to the article :-) - I highly recommend that you read and understand Wikipedia's guidelines on citing a reliable source (especially edits made to biographies of living persons). This way, your edits will be less likely to be challenged and reverted by other editors. Please let me know if you have any questions. I'll be happy to help you. ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 03:19, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Original Barnstar
Thank you for your help as I am new here in Wikipedia! 1.Erfolg (talk) 19:29, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
Hi, 1.Erfolg. Thank you for the barnstar. No problem, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you become a long-term contributor here and that you enjoy your stay! Please do not hesitate to message me with any questions that you may have. I'll be happy to point you in the right direction. Again, I offer you my most sincere welcome. ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 19:34, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Varmint hunting

We have a content dispute there, and your use of rollback to undo my good-faith edits is a misuse of your user rights. Note that this is sanctionable if it continues. 204.15.50.242 (talk) 00:03, 18 March 2015 (UTC)

I believe the edit I saw was an older revision and more NPOV-ish than your recent modification to the article. Nonetheless, please feel free to revert. Please accept my most sincere apologies if I made a mistake. Happy editing :-) ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 00:11, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Well yes, we disagree somewhat on what is NPOV for that article. That's a typical content dispute. It wasn't vandalism. 204.15.50.242 (talk) 00:19, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
I appreciate you for taking the time to let me know about this. Please accept my apologies for reverting your changes. We all make mistakes :-) ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 00:22, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Don't we all? Regards. 204.15.50.242 (talk) 00:39, 18 March 2015 (UTC)

Sorry

Sorry for my disruptive editing. How are you so fast at finding mistakes in articles and reverting them?

96.49.8.207 (talk) 00:08, 18 March 2015 (UTC)

No subject

i apologise, just having a bit of crude high school fun during my english class. sorry to waste your time man <3 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shhhikari (talk • contribs) 00:17, 18 March 2015 (UTC)

Trouted!

Whack!

You've been whacked with a wet trout.

Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly.

Please only thank me for one edit if I revert a spammer many times, you made me think I screwed something up when I saw I had 5 notifications :P. Don't takes this too seriously, just a bit of fun! Thanks, TheMesquitobuzz 01:03, 18 March 2015 (UTC)

HAHA! That actually made me laugh. Anyways... thanks for letting me know, TheMesquito. I try to be giving with the "thanks" button - especially towards other editors that do what you did. Perhaps I went a little overboard ;-) Good to meet you, by the way! ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 01:30, 18 March 2015 (UTC)

I left the update on Manitowoc,_Wisconsin adding the fictional character Director Phil Coulson of S.H.I.E.L.D.

I left the update on Manitowoc,_Wisconsin adding the fictional character Director Phil Coulson of S.H.I.E.L.D. It was mentioned on the season 2 episode 13 of ABC network's "Marvel's Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D." that he was born and raised in Manitowoc. Besides being it mentioned more than once on the episode it is also listed on the official Marvel WIKI page: http://marvel.wikia.com/Phillip_Coulson_(Earth-199999) as his birthplace.

I know this is for a fictional character, but his character is clearly a notable figure from Manitowoc, even if it's just in a fictional universe.

03:31, 18 March 2015 (UTC)Chris Cunningham — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.51.90.5 (talk)

Your edit here did not include a source. This is why I reverted it. You need to add your source to the article! :-) - See this guideline if you need assistance with doing so. You're also more than welcome to ask me for help as well. ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 03:36, 18 March 2015 (UTC)

No Subject

Hey.

I'm creating a page for the screenwriter John MacInnes, who wrote the script for Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare.

You left me a not that I need to supply a citation for a change I made. Specifically his current location and work. I know the person in question. How do I provide a citation? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Grubbytoy (talk • contribs) 01:39, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

Hi, Grubbytoy. Nice to meet you! Citing a source with your edits is an important guideline to know and understand when contributing to Wikipedia. See this guideline; it should answer all of your questions. Please let me know if you have any questions about that guideline. I'll be happy to answer them. ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 22:44, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

STOP

STOP EDITING MY STUFF 😡😡😡😡 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jahlaya (talk • contribs) 22:31, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

New unreviewed article

Hi, I have just created a new article :https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SAFCO .Can you please review it and tell me if it is OK? 1.Erfolg (talk) 16:13, 21 March 2015 (UTC)?

Hi, 1.Erfolg - good to see you again! Sure can! After looking through the article, I find that it seems written like an advertisement rather than in an encyclopedic and neutral manner. A lot of the content looks to have been copied straight over from the company webpage (granted you cited it as a source), but can still be problematic in terms of copyright violations - be extremely careful when doing that kind of stuff. I would make sure that you read and understand Wikipedia's policy on citing sources and copyrights; violating those policies (especially when it comes to copyright violations) is a big no-no and if you're not careful, can get you blocked and even affect your future on Wikipedia should you edit long-term and want to gain community trust. Please don't hesitate to let me know if you have any questions or need anything else. I'll be happy to help! ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 22:34, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

AP Human Geography

Hey, can you help me with something for my project. Why is The World Systems Theory important to the study of human geography?

Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.235.196.87 (talk) 01:15, 28 March 2015 (UTC)

Talk page

Hi Oshwah, your talk page looks very nice. I was wondering how did you get yours to have that background? Is there a page or something where you get them from? Please help me out with this. Thanks a lot! Fresh Sullivan (talk) 18:43, 8 April 2015 (UTC)

Hi Fresh Sullivan. It's a pleasure to meet you! Thanks for the compliment about my talk page colors. To answer your question, it's just a basic HTML div style tag that I typed up. Just edit your talk page and add this to the top:
<div style="background-color: #EBF5FF;">
Don't add a closing tag on the bottom as you would (and should) on normal HTML webpages. New messages will be placed underneath the closing tag, making the background color appear white behind your new messages each time that somebody leaves one. The #EBF5FF represents the color you want your background to be. You can choose a different color by visiting an HTML color code generator webpage. I don't think I can provide a direct external link here for copyright reasons, but if you Google "HTML color codes", the top result should do you just fine. One piece of advice: Choose a light color that's easy on the eyes. Dark or flamboyantly bright backgrounds will annoy other editors and make your talk page hard to read. Again, it's great to meet you and happy editing :-) ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 23:02, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
Thanks so much for the help!! I Googled that and chose an HTML color that I like, it's a little darker than yours. Thank you again, for helping me out. I got my talk page to like nicer. Happy editing! Fresh Sullivan (talk) 23:47, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi, Fresh Sullivan. You're very welcome. Glad I could help! ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 23:50, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

No Subject

WHAT DID YOU CHANGE???? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.21.89.60 (talk) 00:03, 10 April 2015 (UTC)

New Provost

Sherif Sedky is the new provost of the AUC. check it out for yourself.Yousefgamed (talk) 00:09, 11 April 2015 (UTC)

Eric Stover

Hi User:Oshwah, Thanks for your comment on my Eric Stover article. I deleted it because I submitted two of the same article for review and was trying to delete one of them. I am unsure of how/where I submitted the article twice.

No Subject

oswah- the adam-god theory was never taught by brigham young or his successors. in a speech he stated god was in the garden of eden with adam and eve , which is often misinterpeted due to unclear speech — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:30A:2C5B:8700:11C6:31BA:90BE:A7F (talk) 19:50, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

Edit to Sex tourism

Hello,

Thank you for your interest in the edit I made to the article on Sex tourism. I actually did not remove any text, as you described, but instead just moved 2 paragraphs from the end of the "General" section to the beginning, and added some information about citations, etc. I have restored my edit and left an explanation of what edits I made. I apologize for the confusion! Thank you, LHall19 (talk) 23:09, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

Hi, LHall19. Thanks for sending me a message about my revert. After taking another look at your changes, I realize that you did, in fact, move the content in question elsewhere - my apologies for the mistake. It looks like you've restored your changes, so it doesn't look like there is anything else I need to do. It's a pleasure to meet you, and happy editing :-) ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 00:34, 29 April 2015 (UTC)

Ezekiel change

Hi

The current information is incorrect. There are no Babylonian documents confirming the sacking of Jerusalem. Thus I made the change. Of course, you can delete the sentence altogether. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.125.208.58 (talk) 23:13, 5 May 2015 (UTC)

my edit

bro that 100% fact i have a book that even says so. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.221.161.32 (talk) 19:54, 19 May 2015 (UTC)

If you have the source in print, you can cite it using the book citing guidelines and examples. Then, your edit will be fine. Providing no source for your edits can be challenged and removed. See this policy for more information. ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 05:18, 20 May 2015 (UTC)

Ya want his Birth Certficate?

Ya want his Birth Certficate? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:306:BCA9:F2D0:2DDF:BD31:8CE:CC9D (talk) 05:10, 20 May 2015 (UTC)

A reliable source supporting your edit to the article would be even better :-) ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 05:19, 20 May 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for stopping vandalism by Rohilla786

Thanks, the page Rohilla_Rajputs already needs better light and contribs of references and research because one namesake is popular and another needs perspicacity as well as checking of tampering the article.hey_pal (Friend.hey)(talk) 07:32, 27 May 2015 (UTC)

Hi, Friend.hey. No problem! Happy to help! :-) ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 07:38, 27 May 2015 (UTC)

No Subject

Yeah can you change it. I was kind of messing around. Sorry. You can change it though — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.102.93.94 (talk) 02:57, 4 June 2015 (UTC)

No Subject

Hi There, I wanted to make an edit:On Gaudapada page, where you mention Shankaracharya's guru as govinda, the hyperlink goes to Govinda/krishna's page. I wanted to edit and change the hyperlink to go to Govinda Bhagavatpada's page.

Rehards Asha — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.148.240.148 (talk) 22:48, 9 June 2015 (UTC)

No Subject

I am sitting next to Charles W Adams, and making these changes with his approval. Please leave them. He is currently trying to get back a deposit, he is married to a playboy playmate, and has died his hair platinum blonde. The only thing I changed that was false was his ranking, which was already wrong. The highest ranking he achieved was 33, not 34. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.178.177.246 (talk) 22:52, 9 June 2015 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
thanks much for reverting WP:COI vandalism on OceanaGold ! ...and i fully subscribe to your quotes, man. Wuerzele (talk) 07:37, 11 June 2015 (UTC)
Hi, Wuerzele. I just wanted to post a response and thank you for the recognition. I am happy that those COI edits have stopped. I saw that you reverted another edit by that IP; I appreciate that very much. Also, It's awesome to hear that you like the quotes that I have listed on my user space. Keep rockin' it, and happy editing. *raises beer glass* - A pleasure to meet you, good sir :-) ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 06:54, 12 June 2015 (UTC)

No subject

hey I think these birds should be called ideally dracula birds. You dare disagree? :X — Preceding unsigned comment added by 14.139.160.231 (talk) 05:07, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

hi, i would like to know if the birds existed till 18th century ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 14.139.160.231 (talk) 05:10, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

Luke Theodore Walton

Hey Oshwah,

His middle name is Theodore. Many other players have their middle names added. This is not irrelevant.

Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by 100.9.147.188 (talk) 05:53, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
Good job on keeping a sharp eye on Luke Walton - keep it up! E. Lee (talk) 05:56, 17 June 2015 (UTC)
Hi, E. Lee. My most sincere and humbled appreciation is owed to you; thank you for taking the time to leave me this barnstar. It's a pleasure to meet you, and (as I always say) - Happy Editing :-) ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 06:03, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

Reasoning

The portion of the article seemed to include lengthy and unnecessary details. They seemed graphic and inappropriate as well, and such things should be removed. 24.178.45.221 (talk) 06:00, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

No subject

Thanks Oshwah. The change you reverted is highly relevant. In Australia, this is Eddie's biggest claim to fame and many people refer to him by the name 'Boofhead' instead of his given name Eddie - assigning nicknames is an Australian tradition. Eddie's nickname is recorded in our country's Hansard (transcripts of parliamentary debate) - the first and only Australian so far to have such a distinction. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Auswikifan (talk • contribs) 07:36, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

Edits to Eric Rasmussen (physician)

Hello, Oshwah,

I received word from Lin Wells, the former Asst Secretary of Defense, that he'd put up a page about me today. I went out to read it and saw a few errors and a few links that went to places that didn't exist. I've been working on them and just saw you revert some of them. There is a note from you that I broke a template to the Strong Angel entry, which I certainly did not intend to do, and have not gone out to that article. I did, however, write that article. My apologies if something I did on Eric Rasmussen (physician) altered something there.

But the stuff I'm changing on Eric Rasmussen (physician) is stuff that really needs to be changed. I am, of course, that person, and I'm signed in as me. Can you please tell me what I did that was incorrect? Most of these are factual changes or editorial alterations that are answering bad links or wrong citations. And they take a long time.

Advice, please?

(Ah. And on my returning to the page I see that you've reverted my change about what InSTEDD did while I was CEO back to "health informatics". I'm not sure why you'd do that. I know what InSTEDD did while I was CEO and that's not it. What I had put there was a proper correction. Could you please put my changes back? You also changed the Roddenberry Foundation and InSTEDD back to referencing Wikipedia pages that don't exist when I had made them proper external references. Now they are red again. That does not make sense to me. They turn red. They are clearly wrong references. Why revert to a wrong thing when it had been corrected?)

This article is about me. I'm fixing things that are wrong. Please help me understand what you're doing.

Thanks, Eric — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rasmussene (talk • contribs) 07:42, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

Hi Rasmussene, and welcome to Wikipedia! I appreciate you for taking the time to message me, and I'll be happy to assist you with your questions. The big issue that I see with your edits to Eric Rasmussen (physician) is that you indicated that this is an article about yourself. This represents a conflict of interest between yourself and, well... the article about yourself, which is behavior that is highly discouraged by the Wikipedia community. Before proceeding with any more edits to that article, you should read and understand Wikipedia's policies regarding Neutral point of view and conflict of interest, as it will answer most of your questions. Since you are new here, you might want to begin by starting with Wikipedia's Five pillars, as it is the best guideline for newcomers to begin. Please let me know if you have any more questions. I'll be happy to answer them. Again, I welcome you to Wikipedia and I hope that you enjoy your stay and become a long-term contributor here. ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 07:55, 17 June 2015 (UTC)
Oshwah, I've now read the Five Pillars. You state that your big issue is that I'm correcting an article written by someone else about myself. While I can certainly appreciate the principle of neutral point of view, I can also appreciate the value of fixing broken links, failed citations, typos, and factual errors that no third-party author, no matter how careful, could recognize. So I did those things. And you re-introduced them. Now there are red links again, and typos, and errors, all of which had been fixed. How does Wikipedia usually resolve such conundrums?
Someone else messaged me on my talk page earlier this year citing the same questions that you had. I'm going to respond to you with the (similar) response that I gave to that user:
Honestly, the best thing you can do is constructively participate in other projects and articles that personally interest you, and let other editors who have no personal ties with your article cross this bridge - don't let yourself get involved. Even injecting yourself in discussions about articles in which you have personal involvement with can be seen as a conflict of interest. To provide examples about myself: I don't make any kind of edits or participate in any discussions to articles that involve my place of employment, where I went to college, the city I grew up in, or any other article that would compromise my ability to edit within a neutral point-of-view. Other editors may have different opinions on what you should do, but I can say that this is the best way to contribute positively to Wikipedia and improve the project. I hope this response sets you in the correct direction and, should you decide to regularly contribute to Wikipedia, that you enjoy your time and remember that everyone's goal (should be) to improve and maintain the encyclopedia above all else. Please let me know if you have any more questions. ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 08:23, 17 June 2015 (UTC)
That's a delicate balance to walk, and I can appreciate the importance of neutrality. If the goal, though, above all else, is to improve and maintain the encyclopedia, and the improvements made earlier tonight fixed broken links and typos and other errors that clearly improved the article, and the goal of improvement is more important than neutral point of view, and there is no one else making these improvements (you're an editor, as you note above, with no personal ties, and you did not improve the article, you re-introduced all of the errors again) I'm puzzled about who is expected to fix things. As far as I can tell so far, that article is going to remain flawed. So that goal of improving is not being met, and won't be. Odd. But I'll accept it. We'll leave the encyclopedia un-improved and wrong to meet the secondary goal of neutral point of view. I think there is a logical fallacy in there somewhere, and I'm vaguely annoyed at having a nicer looking article with fewer typos broken again. But I have other things to do. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rasmussene (talk • contribs) 08:40, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

Request removal of PROD tag on Mrunal Bhosale

Hello,

Request you to consider my recommendation that PROD tag on Mrunal Bhosale article is no longer needed as the concern stated (non-notable boxer does not mean WP:NBOX) has been addressed in the latest edit. I have cited the link which clearly shows boxer has fought at national level in India, in an AIBA-affiliated tournament. Link cited is http://boxingindia.in/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/1st-Elite-Mens-National-Boxing-Champrionship-Results.pdf — Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.225.46.157 (talk) 07:50, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

You are free to remove the PROD tag on any article. A single editor objecting to a PROD is enough to defeat it, as per WP:PROD. Please note that while this defeats the proposed deletion, it is possible the article may still be nominated for deletion using the WP:AFD process. This would trigger a discussion to create a consensus on whether the article should be deleted. For this reason, you should carefully consider whether the concerns raised by the editor who added a PROD tag were valid, and if so, if they were adequately addressed before moving the PROD. BU Rob13 (talk) 08:02, 17 June 2015 (UTC)
Please accept my sincere apologies; I don't know why I reverted that edit. For some crazy reason, I thought that you were removing a CSD tag, which is why I reverted the edit in the first place. It's just one of those days, I guess. It looks like my reversion was fixed. I removed the warning from your talk page. Again, please accept my apologies. ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 08:08, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

Youth akali dal

Hi Oshwah. I noticed that earlier tonight you reverted an edit by the original author of Youth akali dal that blanked the page. Because this was a good faith attempt by the author to request the removal of an article with copyright concerns and no substantial content added by anyone but the original author, I believe it should have been nominated for speedy deletion as per WP:G7. Just wanted to give you a heads up for future knowledge. If you feel differently about the appropriate action, feel free to respond here and I'll take another look. I'm watching the page, so no need to ping me. Thanks for working hard to combat vandalism! BU Rob13 (talk) 08:05, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

Hi, BU Rob13. Thank you for pointing this out as well as for providing input to my previous talk page discussion. I really appreciate it. I'll make sure to keep a more closer eye out; I usually catch those kind of things, but apparently I missed this instance. It's a pleasure to meet you, and happy editing! ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 08:11, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

Burlington High School

Oshwah -

This is in regards to the changes for Burlington High School. The stats are included in the Mass DOE statistics (reference 1). I will reverse the changes and add the reference. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 104.200.151.56 (talk) 00:50, 24 June 2015 (UTC)

Hi, 104.200.151.56. I see that you've added references to your revision. That's all I was concerned about. Happy editing! ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 02:04, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Oshwah/TalkPageArchives/2015-1&oldid=863689391"