User:Patilsandy

This user is a student editor in Auburn_Global_at_Auburn_University_/730_for_STEM__(Fall_2018).

sandboxes

Peer Review[edit]

REVIEWER: Jisung, Jang_________________________________________________________________

REVIEWEE: Sandeep____________________________________________________________________

I am reviewing (check one):

ð Additions to an existing article (SKIP SECTION 1)

ð A new article

1. Lead helps me understand the topic and reflects the most important information	Yes	No	Comments: Through the presentation contents, I get to know what the cycle will is in terms of the field of hydrology.
2. Structure is organized in a logical order	Yes	No	Comments: Presentation is well structured in that his plan is systematically organized to each other which allows me to understand more about it. I think, if it is available in Wiki-page, author would explain well in this topic.
3. Balance is reflected in the sections through length and perspective	Yes	No	Comments: I think it cope with every aspect of hydrology which means it would be too broad for him to deal with for now. I think he should narrow down his topic in some sense.
4. Neutrality is reflected in the writing as well as the sources	Yes	No	Comments: As the author already emphasized through the presentation, the author would well success in citation and literature review for the topic. If it is so, there will be any issue regarding plagiarism and regulation for Wiki.
5. Sources are reliable and attributed	Yes	No	Comments: I think the topic is good to use in that it requires high degree of knowledge because CAD and Fluid dynamics are forcing him to put efforts on it. In this regard, he should be wary of using other sources with a credit.
Feedback	What did the author do well? I think he planned well for now. it is time for him to make a tangible material with suitable references.			What should they improve? I think, for now, he should focus on introduction part based on his presentation file so that he can mechanically organize the article. And then, I think, based on the definition, fluid dynamics, CAD, and engineering parts should be followed.