User:Razor2988/Archive/1

Vandalism Reverts

Hi! Just wanted to say thanks for your help reverting vandalism :) Enti342 MEMO 19:25, 20 August 2010 (UTC)

Rollback Granted

Hey their Razor,

I have granted rollback rights to your account; the reason for this is that after a review of some of your contributions, I believe you can be trusted to use rollback correctly, and for its intended usage of reverting vandalism, and that you will not abuse it by reverting good-faith edits or to revert-war. For information on rollback, see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback and Wikipedia:Rollback feature. If you do not want rollback, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Good luck and thanks. Mifter (talk) 03:51, 14 February 2010 (UTC)

Fair Use or Public Domain Question

Hi- I just wanted to enquire about the concept of a Mission Statement for a Corporation being copyrighted. It would seem that the mission statement of a corporation would be a non-creative work and therefore not covered under copyright (or in the public domain). I guess this gets to be a question if a lot of creativity is put into a mission statement by a corporation when they are filling out the IRS paperwork, but it seems that the act of copying that statement from the form to another webpage to a Wiki page to a Non-profit watchdog website, etc., etc., would be fair use, if a use at all. Your San Buenaventura Conservancy edit brings this up. Being the current Conservancy Board president I can't imagine an instance where I would be able to enforce a use of our non-profit corps. mission statment. I don't find it inherently creative, and it exists in many places and is copied at will every time the government updates our paperwork. I looked on the various Wikipedia pages on Fair Use and Public Domain and Copyright, but this seems to begin at the definition of what can and is copyrightable, and frankly the Wikipedia pages don't go into a lot of detail on that aspect of "creative works".

Corensearchbot correctly assessed that the text was verbatim from the Conservancy website, but it must be verbatim to be correct. But I don't think it's existance in the Conservancy website automatically copyrights its existance on the WWW just because the creative parts of the Conservancy are copyrighted.

I'm a commecial photographer and grant usage for my photos and use public domain historic photos on a regular basis so I'm conceptually familiar about copyright, though I'm no expert. I'm always curious about copyrights and this seemed like an interesting topic.

Thanks for your time Schafphoto (talk) 18:42, 22 December 2010 (UTC)

response

Sorry wrong talk page...was for VernoWhitney...Oops

Re. Lucy Stillman

That wasn't vandalism. It's a large, unwikified and possibly copyvio article about a character in the game. I felt that a redirect would be more appropriate than a PROD or speedy nomination. Cheers, XXX antiuser ^eh? 00:27, 13 February 2010 (UTC)

sorry it was a error on my side --Razor2988 (talk) 03:08, 30 June 2011 (UTC)

Leona Wood revert to last revision

Hi,

I would like to know why the quote was removed. It is in the article cited. You can find it in the ProQuest database Historical Newspapers Los Angeles Times (1881 - 1987) by searching for "finest ethnic companies" Or I can send you a PDF.

Thank you, M343r (talk) 02:22, 1 June 2011 (UTC)

response to question

you blanked the page so i reverted the edit to bring back all that was deleted --Razor2988 (talk) 02:33, 1 June 2011 (UTC)

re: blanking the page

This may be due to a confusion on my part: I moved the page from my user space to the mainspace, but the page in my user space was still there, so I deleted all the text in it. Would that affect the page in the mainspace? If so, I do I get rid of the page in my user space? (I wanted to do this because it was already getting Google search results.)

Thanks!

response for response

I have deleated the warning please if you have any questions follow this link help page.--Razor2988 (talk) 19:40, 1 June 2011 (UTC)

Thank you

Thank you for being patient with a newbie.

M343r (talk) 02:55, 2 June 2011 (UTC)

May 2011

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Tamil language with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Free Bear (talk) 21:39, 30 May 2011 (UTC)

razor 2988's response

I am sorry but i do not understand why you warned my page, could you please show me what i did wrong so i may not make the same mistake -razor2988

free bear's response

I have had a look and I can't see what happened there, I must have made a mistake. I am so sorry! Free Bear (talk) 22:00, 30 May 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of List of minecraft mods

The article List of minecraft mods has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Indiscriminate list of Minecraft video game's mods, each without independent notability. Borders on WP:GAMECRUFT and WP:GAMEGUIDE. Topic on it's own "list of Minecraft mods" does not pass WP:GNG and is unlikely to receive broad independent reliable source coverage.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —  HELLKNOWZ  ▎TALK 08:03, 3 July 2011 (UTC)