User:Steve Quinn/Post-empirical science
 | This is not a Wikipedia article: It is an individual user's work-in-progress page, and may be incomplete and/or unreliable. For guidance on developing this draft, see Wikipedia:So you made a userspace draft. Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Post-empirical science (post-empirical physics) is a euphuism for[1][2][3][4] Debunked by Sabine Hossenfelder, she says, "Post-empirical science is an oxymoron."[5] What is science and why should we care? (not sure if this is relevant)[6] Scroll down past this article and see related links on this page. [7] Add one.[8]Add one.[9]Add one.[10] Be sure to check Post-empirical science in News search Google.
References[edit]
- ^ "Post-empirical science is an oxymoron, and it is dangerous | Aeon Essays".
- ^ "The string theory wars show us how science needs philosophy | Aeon Essays".
- ^ Ellis, George; Silk, Joe (2014). "Scientific method: Defend the integrity of physics". Nature. 516 (7531): 321–323. Bibcode:2014Natur.516..321E. doi:10.1038/516321a. PMID 25519115. S2CID 4389321.
- ^ "How the Many-Worlds theory of Hugh Everett split the Universe | Aeon Essays".
- ^ "Sabine Hossenfelder: Backreaction: Post-empirical science is an oxymoron". 12 July 2014.
- ^ "What is science and why should we care? — Part I". 26 March 2014.
- ^ Ellis, George; Silk, Joe (2014). "Scientific method: Defend the integrity of physics". Nature. 516 (7531): 321–323. Bibcode:2014Natur.516..321E. doi:10.1038/516321a. PMID 25519115. S2CID 4389321.
- ^ "Physicist Sabine Hossenfelder Fears Theorists, Lacking Data, May Succumb to "Wishful Thinking"".
- ^ Ananthaswamy, Anil (2018). "How the belief in beauty has triggered a crisis in physics". Nature. 558 (7709): 186–187. Bibcode:2018Natur.558..186A. doi:10.1038/d41586-018-05374-9. S2CID 256769826.
- ^ https://www.npr.org/sections/13.7/2015/01/27/381809832/the-most-dangerous-ideas-in-science
External links[edit]