This user is taking a wikibreak and may be away or inactive for varying periods of time.
Although they may occasionally be able to do some editing, messages left for them may not be replied to for a while.
They will be back on Wikipedia when college is over.
The Filmaker is a mergist wikipedian and hopes he doesn't anger anyone (he has failed). He hopes that no one reads this page as it is probably quite embarassing for him, but The Filmaker wishes for people to click on his name and leave comments in his discussion area, so The Filmaker provides them with one page of The Filmaker's hopes and dreams.
The description of a plot of artistic work does not require a reference per this quote by the Featured Article Director: "No, the purpose of adding a reference is to allow someone to know the source of a particular bit of information. It should be implicitely obvious that when you are describing the plot of a work, the source of the information is the work itself. Thus, no reference is necessary. Raul654 19:03, 18 May 2006 (UTC)"
Lately, I've noticed an increase in the word "fanboy". An irritating increase might I add. Since I do lean towards working on articles, such as Bond films, Batman, and especially Star Wars, I am often accused of being a "fanboy". I am beginning to find the word insulting. Around every corner there is someone accusing someone of "fanboy logic" or someone disagreeing with a source for being a "fanboy website". I am perfectly all right if you would like to use the word "fan" for "fan logic" and "fan website". However fanboy has always been a derogatory word, and I feel that it should fall in the realm of personal attacks. I myself am a fan of Star Wars perhaps even falling into the category of what is a "fanboy". However, I do not allow it to override my logic on Wikipedia. These fans and fanboys have a place in society and are, in a way, the reason why we are writing these articles in the first place. Why are we so content to beat them down for liking these films?
Work on main Star Wars article for GA or FA status to maintain featured topic.
Continue referring to self in the third-person on user page.
This page will continue as soon as The Filmaker has something to say......
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
for making top notch articles out of so-so films (The Star Wars Prequel Trilogy... though ROTS was great, and I actually liked TPM...oops, better stop talking, this is a barnstar...or typing. Or both. Who talks when they type?) ....(Complain)(Let us to it pell-mell) 10:28, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
The Barnstar of High Culture
Awarded for your work in getting Red vs Blue up to featured article status.
The Imperial Scout
For improving information in the Star Wars pages, and for keeping it real, I would like to award you the Star Wars barnstar for your detailed and good editing within the SW sphere, a true scout of the Empire! ( Seong0980 12:21, 29 January 2007 (UTC) )
.svg){kind=small}
.svg){kind=small}
A Beautiful Mind (film)
Star Wars Episode IV: A New Hope
