User:The garmine/talkarchive-2016-12

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You are currently viewing an archive of The garmine's user talk page from December 2016. Please do not modify this page.

These discussions are no longer active and were moved here for historical and record-keeping purposes. If you need to respond to a discussion from here, please create a new discussion on my user talk page and with a link to the archived discussion here so I can easily follow, and we'll be able to pick up where we left off no problem.


Were you trying to send me a message? No worries. Just click here to go the correct page.



December 2016

my draft has been sitting in my sandbox for hours and it hasnt been reviewed. L.S. inc. (talk) 05:36, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

Hello. If you're talking about the page at User:L.S. inc./sandbox, you haven't submitted it for review. There is a big blue button in the tag at the top of the page that you can click to submit it for review. Please note, however, that it will take longer than a few hours. Depending on the page, some pages have been waiting review for a few weeks. Cheers, Nick⁠—⁠Contact/Contribs 06:02, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (December 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dodger67 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 15:44, 1 December 2016 (UTC)


Teahouse logo
Hello! L.S. inc., I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 15:44, 1 December 2016 (UTC)


Hi L.S.! Nice effort but needs to follow guidelines such as WP:NOTDIRECTORY and WP:INDISCRIMINATE. To this effect, you should find some reliable sources which discuss manufacturers of model trains in general, perhaps with notes on regional trends and how they evolved historically. Then write some nice prose summarizing and citing those sources and add this to the top of your article. I would also advise restricting the list to sufficiently notable manufacturers, with criteria for inclusion to be discussed with the community of fellow editors. Finally, the list is a bit unwieldy to read and would be more useful if formatted as a table, where information can be sorted. There is guidance at Help:Table and a good example for a similar article structure and table would be List of Progress flights. Enjoy! — JFG talk 09:10, 2 December 2016 (UTC)