User talk:!hellao!
!hellao!, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]
|
Hi !hellao!! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:03, 19 January 2017 (UTC) |
Why?[edit]
What's up with all these edits and undos to the Chess.com article? If you want to experiment and play around you can do that within your own userspace, by creating a sandbox. MaxBrowne (talk) 07:25, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
- OK this is getting silly. I have raised it on the Administrators' Noticeboard. MaxBrowne (talk) 08:25, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
January 2017[edit]
 | This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 10:04, 24 January 2017 (UTC) |
- Per this edit you tried to re-add the name Macer75, an account that was previously blocked for disruptive editing. It's unlikely that a new account would try to restore this name to the article. Now that aside, you have also made a number of non-beneficial edits to the article, including a series of edits where you simply added and removed a period from the very start of the article. As you made several other edits to the article prior to this, it doesn't really come across like you were testing the article. I was initially going to just give you a warning, but the sockpuppetry is what pushed it to a block. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 10:07, 24 January 2017 (UTC)