User talk:"The Phenomenal (Decay)"

Welcome![edit]

Hello, "The Phenomenal (Decay)", and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to Lana (wrestling). I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Govindaharihari (talk) 17:01, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Lana[edit]

Hi there, have you got a link to support your changes? see WP:RS Govindaharihari (talk) 17:06, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Team B.A.D. & Blonde Hazel?[edit]

Do you have a link to support the team's name? All references to the team name are "Team B.A.D. & Blonde", I am not sure where the "Hazel" part is coming from. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cms0678 (talk • contribs) 08:47, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! "The Phenomenal (Decay)", I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! -Liance^{talk/contribs} 12:47, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

April 2016[edit]

Greetings. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Template:WWE personnel, did not appear to be constructive and has been or will be reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. "Hey there! How's it goin'?" 16:15, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to WWE Divas Championship. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. —Skyllfully ^(talk | _contribs) 01:25, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Phenomenal (Decay) has blanked some of his warnings, he has already received more than four. There's enough to report him/her to WP:AVI if there is another incident.LM2000 (talk) 04:08, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Danny Styles[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Danny Styles, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. LM2000 (talk) 07:49, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion[edit]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. LM2000 (talk) 04:34, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:The Beautiful Fierce Females.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:The Beautiful Fierce Females.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 06:05, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Block[edit]

As you know, you were blocked from editing for 48 hours for edit warring, as you did at Sasha Banks. However, I have now discovered that you have repeatedly been uploading files in violation of copyright, despite previously being blocked for copyright infringement. In view of that, together with other disruptive editing of various kinds, including creation and re-creation of a hoax article, I have extended the block to indefinite. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. The reason you give will need to persuade an administrator that you are not likely to edit again in the same disruptive ways as you have done in the past.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

"The Phenomenal (Decay)" (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I didn't know/do anything The P1 Decay (Official) 12:53, 23 April 2016 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Your fraudulent use of the unblock template, falsely claiming an admin has accepted your unblock request, shows otherwise. Do that again and you'll have your block extended and lose access to this page. Yamla (talk) 13:17, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Ah. Looks like your block has already been extended to an indefinite block. Definitely appropriate here. --Yamla (talk) 13:19, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You were warned. You've now lost access to your talk page for a week. --Yamla (talk) 13:25, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure the initial misuse of the unblock template was intentional. Anyway, here's what I composed and edit conflicted with you in placing:

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

"The Phenomenal (Decay)" (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I didn't know/do anything The P1 Decay (Official) 12:53, 23 April 2016 (UTC) Please, unblock me. I wouldn't do anything as you do as well as thanks The P1 Decay (Official) 12:53, 23 April 2016 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I have reformatted this request to combine two parts because, whether intentionally or unintentionally, you used the unblock template in a manner indicating you had accepted your own unblock request.

Your rationale for unblocking contain no valid basis to support an unblock. I have looked at your edit history of this page and you removed many warnings as well as the prior block notice, which we take to mean you had read them. Regardless, competence is required. Claiming you did not do anything is a non-starter; yes you did. Claiming you did not understand it—especially after being warned numerous times, removing them, not engaging with those warning you, and not addressing the issue—provides me with the opposite of confidence you will not engage in further edit warring or copyright violations upon an unblock. If you want to be unblocked, you will need to compose an unblock request that shows you understand the reasons for (both parts of) the block and something substantive to convince a subsequent reviewing administrator that you won't do it again--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 13:31, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, "The Phenomenal (Decay)". Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The Beautiful Fierce Females for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Beautiful Fierce Females is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Beautiful Fierce Females until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Nikki♥311 03:45, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]