User talk:^DevelopAll

Image copyright problem with Image:Diaton_Tonometer_eyelid_iop_test.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Diaton_Tonometer_eyelid_iop_test.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 12:01, 22 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Tonometer/Tonometry[edit]

Dear AED, please do not take my actions personally, but the previous version of the update was creating a negative "suggested" opinion about Diaton; where the opinion was based on TGDc and not Diaton (fyi TGDc is no longer in production). As you have also correctly noticed, "powered by" - we have added Diaton Tonometry as an educational vehicle to Wikipedia just a few days ago due to the FDA approval - it's a new, unique method, which I hope will do much good to the industry and the cause overall. No spamming was intended and would like to request to reinstate the link as external source for information purposes – the link did not lead to the buy page, just presented legitimate overview… I also wanted to take a moment to thank you for taking your time to review all the available info as deep as you have; even I haven’t done as much as you have. There are a number of fresh publications, with up-to-date information about Diaton entering wide media within this and the following months. I will try to make you aware as it appears and would like to jointly, since we're educating the same marketplace, to create awareness of this new tonometry method. Looking forward… ^DA

Is there a particular reason that you keep deleting good information about the negative aspects of the Diaton tonometer from Tonometer and Tonometry? -AED 20:03, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

RE: from ^DevelopAll[edit]

Um, hello. You left a message on my talk page; something about a Diaton tonometer. Anyway, I think you might have the wrong user. K im u 05:27, 2 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm not presenting anything at ARVO this year, so won't be there, sorry. but I enjoyed your abstract. I wish you luck with your new tonometer but would suggest that 1) the device needs to be disinfected between patients to reduce cross contamination of patients with blepharitis, 2) limitations of the device need to be clearly stated to maintain credibility and 3) reference should be made to other research which has highlighted the difficulty of obtaining transcleral (let alone transpalebral) tonometer readings. e.g. Kolin T, Wedemeyer LL, Kolin E, Braun Y. Comparison of scleral and corneal Tono-Pen readings. .J AAPOS. 2003;7: 291-292 and Breitfeller JM, Krohn DL. Limbal pneumatonometry. Am J Ophthalmol. 1980; 89: 344-352. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nernst (talk • contribs) 19:10, 2 May 2009 (UTC) Nernst (talk) 19:13, 2 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, thank you for your contribution. I don't think the Vestnik Oftalmologii articles are suitable for inclusion as (1) only one of them relates to a clinical study (2) that study is looking at changes pre/post refractive surgery and is not a direct validation study of the device and (3) neither article has an english abstract. The posters references refer to the grey literature and are not suitable where other published peer reviewed evidence exists. If you have some personal experience/interest in the device you may find it useful to familiarise yourself with wikipedia's policy on conflicts of interest Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may find it useful to propose changes on the talk page before making further edits to the diatron section Nernst (talk) 23:30, 13 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, many thanks for your concilitory message. As a token of good faith I've removed much of the critical (but strong) evidence regarding the Diaton. I think the quote from Liu's Graefes paper is a fair reflection of that paper and the Eur J Oph paper you cite. It remains of concern that the device records IOPs > 3mmHg difference in 30% of patients and that the accuracy worsens at higher values. The diaton has had a long time to prove itself and has so far failed to do so. The inter-operator variability you mention is also worrying. I will be at ARVO this year and look forward to seeing the device in action. I've removed the mention of Newtons 2nd law as all tonometers use this principle and I've removed the section on sterilisation as the device still needs to be cleaned between patients. I think the current page is a generous reflection of the existing data on the Diaton and would strongly suggest that further edits are discussed on the talk page before making further ammendments. Regards Nernst (talk) 02:45, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Reverting each others edits is a waste of time for both of us, so I was happy with your suggestion of a 'truce' but was disappointed when instead of trying to find a mutually acceptable version, you just reverted my edits. A quick pubmed search on TGDc-01 reveals 18 papers related to the TGDc-01 and the Diaton. I suspect that a unbiased examination of all the literature would result in an article far more critical than any previous version. I am happy to undertake this as you are making it extremely difficult to assume any good faith but instead have reverted the article to the compromise version that followed your suggestion of a truce. Reverting this version will remove any doubt that you are intent on inserting a biased and distorted version of the article.Nernst (talk) 15:28, 28 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Tonomter Tonometry Diaton Eyelid position.jpg[edit]

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Tonomter Tonometry Diaton Eyelid position.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 20:32, 3 December 2010 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Acather96 (talk) 20:32, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Diaton Tonometer Tonometry 3.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Diaton Tonometer Tonometry 3.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 03:50, 15 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:TONOMETER DIATON 2011.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:TONOMETER DIATON 2011.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 21:05, 25 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]