User talk:זה לא יצחק

Permission[edit]

Hi and welcome to Wikipedia! Is it alright if I work on Draft:Dyrvik? I understand some people use drafts to work undisturbed, and it’s ok if you would rather I leave it alone. I would just like to add some references. Thanks! Dylan | ✉ | ✓ 03:33, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Do what you'd like with it! As long as it makes it better it's fine! זה לא יצחק (talk) 03:34, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, thanks! Dylan | ✉ | ✓ 03:35, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dyrvik has been accepted[edit]

Dyrvik, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

asilvering (talk) 16:51, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Stop with your frivolous deletions![edit]

I have done nothing wrong. Yet you keep trying to delete anything I do under the guise of "copyright violations". MY articles were FINE. They had nothing wrong with them yet for whatever reason, you decided to tag them for speedy deletion without me even realizing! Stop! I did not plagiarize! I did not break any "copyright" so stop it . Xpbuild2504 (talk) 03:47, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The draft articles did violate copyright as they did not attribute the text. Even though the text is licensed under CC-BY-SA 4.0, you must provide attribution for the text, I tagged it for deletion because it was a copyvio. You did plagiarize. If you keep making articles copying directly from BetaWiki, you must provide attribution. Yitzhak | זה לא יצחק (talk) 04:06, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Xpbuild2504 (talk) 04:40, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

SPI[edit]

I have noted your name as a suspected sock in Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Winbytedemo. I am actually ready to block you, given the behavioural evidence and the illogic of your statements (two editors stalking you from betawiki till Wikipedia....). I will wait for your coming clean. If you do, and if you share all the alternative accounts you have, I will not block you and give you guidance and a warning. Alternatively, it's your choice how this goes. Let me know. Lourdes 06:35, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

user:Tetadřvo, User:Xpbuild2504, and User:Winbytedemo are sockpuppets of mine. Block and tag them if you'd wish, or move this to a checkuser. Yitzhak | זה לא יצחק (talk) 12:12, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Lourdes You have also misinterpreted what I had said at the ANI. It wasn't two people stalking me, it was one person who was. Yitzhak | זה לא יצחק (talk) 12:31, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Forgot to mention User:imthecapital Yitzhak | זה לא יצחק (talk) 14:57, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Windows 1.0 BYTE demo" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

The redirect Windows 1.0 BYTE demo has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 June 13 § Windows 1.0 BYTE demo until a consensus is reached. TartarTorte 17:53, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

June 2023[edit]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Bbb23 (talk) 23:07, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

זה לא יצחק (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Wow, not even a simple reply?

Decline reason:

Procedural decline as, without TPA, tthere would be no way to have any discussion here. — Daniel Case (talk) 06:36, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Yitzhak | זה לא יצחק (talk) 23:10, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

TPA revoked.--Bbb23 (talk) 00:21, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]