User talk:আইশ্টে হায়লেশ

Welcome![edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia, আইশ্টে হায়লেশ! Thank you for your contributions. I am CAPTAIN RAJU and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or place {{helpme}} on your talk page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Since you've shown some interest in editing topics related to Bangladesh, we hope you'll stay and add content to Bangladesh related articles. A number of important articles related to Bangladesh are yet to be created and many of the existing ones are in poor shape. You can help it improve by becoming a regular editor with adhering to the policies of Wikipedia. Consider joining or watchlisting Bangladesh related discussions (for example, Noticeboard for Bangladesh-related topics).

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! CAPTAIN RAJU ^(✉) 15:31, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

আইশ্টে হায়লেশ, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Hi আইশ্টে হায়লেশ! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cordless Larry (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 30 October 2016 (UTC)

Talkback[edit]

Hello, আইশ্টে হায়লেশ. You have new messages at Iryna Harpy's talk page.
Message added 00:44, 31 October 2016 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Iryna Harpy (talk) 00:44, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

November 2016[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Nudity in film. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a loss of editing privileges. Thank you. — Gestrid (talk) 02:23, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Nudity in film. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. — Gestrid (talk) 02:28, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Gestrid you may remove my edits in Nudity in film page. aishte haylesh.আইশ্টে হায়লেশ (talk) 02:43, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. Trust me, I don't like having to warn people about stuff like this. I apologize if I frightened you at all with talk of being blocked or stuff like that. A block in this case is used mostly to get those who aren't listening to others to listen. This is a collaborative project, after all. — Gestrid (talk) 02:50, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Equipment of the Bangladesh Army, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. - Tom | Thomas.W ^talk 09:45, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Singapore Army, you may be blocked from editing. Dillard 421♂♂ ^{(talk to me)} 09:48, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Talk:Lee Kuan Yew. Cahk (talk) 09:50, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is only being used for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bencherlite ^Talk 09:54, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]