User talk:星耀晨曦

Notification about disabling the Wikipedia collections tool[edit]

Thank you for using the collections feature in Wikipedia beta! Due to technical and moderation issues, we will be turning off this experimental feature. Your collections will be available for viewing and export until March 1st. If you would like to save your collection as links on a special Wikipedia page, please fill out the following form. If you are interested in giving your feedback about Wikipedia Collections please do so here.

Thanks,

Jon Katz
Product manager, Wikimedia Foundation
Jkatz (WMF) (talk) 23:59, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (April 28)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This appears to be meant to be part of a book, as indicated by the fact that it primarily describes a character. It isn't clear whether the book is meant to be the subject of a Wikipedia article, in which case this is very incomplete and unreferenced, or, more likely, meant to be hosted on Wikipedia, in which case see Wikipedia is not a web host. In any case, this is not a valid draft submission.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:星耀晨曦/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 13:13, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! 星耀晨曦, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 13:13, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (April 29)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Anarchyte was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Unreferenced.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:星耀晨曦/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Anarchyte (work | talk) 07:47, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (April 29)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MatthewVanitas was:

Dude, what is the topic of your article?

You must have a clear sentence at the very, very beginning saying your topic, like "An apple is a small temperate fruit grown for human consumption..." where you introduce your topic and bold the title term.

Also, you have two copies of your article on this page, please remove any extra/duplicate materials on the page.

If you want to make a comment to us, don't make a new section, just write "Comment: such and such" at the top of the page and we'll read it. Right now you start out introducing STS-EL but then the article looks to be about Yuuki or something. Please organize this draft better, then click Resubmit.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:星耀晨曦/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MatthewVanitas (talk) 10:39, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

April 2016[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at User:星耀晨曦/sandbox. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be undone.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Please stop resubmitting the sandbox without addressing the comments of the reviewers. In particular, it is still duplicated. If you are having difficulty understanding the reviewer comments, please ask for help at the Teahouse rather than simply resubmitting the draft without addressing the comments. If you continue to resubmit the draft tendentiously, a block may unfortunately be necessary. Robert McClenon (talk) 14:13, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (April 29)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

Now that we think that we know what the topic is, a fictional character, I can see that you have provided only one reference, which is to a series of novels. That does not establish notability. Please provide independent reliable sources for notability of the character (and why she should have her own article).

The article is duplicated.

There is a section (two sections) called Real Life Appearance. How can a fictional character have a real-life appearance?

If the reviewer comments are not clear, please ask for help at the Teahouse or on the reviewer's talk page rather than just resubmitting the draft.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:星耀晨曦/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 14:18, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, User:星耀晨曦/sandbox[edit]

Hello, 星耀晨曦. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "sandbox".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 15:53, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]