User talk:.hodajan

November 2018[edit]

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Rahman Baba have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Materialscientist (talk) 00:30, 2 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Orakzai. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Jessicapierce (talk) 02:26, 2 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Pashtun culture. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Jessicapierce (talk) 02:26, 2 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Pir Roshan. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Jessicapierce (talk) 02:34, 2 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Khushal Khattak. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Jessicapierce (talk) 02:34, 2 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Pathans of Uttar Pradesh. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Jessicapierce (talk) 02:34, 2 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Hafizkhel. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Jessicapierce (talk) 02:38, 2 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Isa Khel (sub-tribe). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Jessicapierce (talk) 02:39, 2 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

.hodajan, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Hi .hodajan! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like John from Idegon (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:05, 2 November 2018 (UTC)

January 2019[edit]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Pakol. - R9tgokunks ⭕ 21:56, 17 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation[edit]

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/.hodajan, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

- R9tgokunks ⭕ 02:35, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry[edit]

This account has been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/.hodajan. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you're welcome to make useful contributions. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below.
— Berean Hunter (talk) 14:21, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]