User talk:104.152.214.35

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

January 2016[edit]

Your recent test edits to Buck Satan and the 666 Shooters were not constructive. It was vandalism and was reverted. Entry of false information is not helpful. If you want to experiment or make a test edit, please use the sandbox. These pages are patrolled by robots and human editors like me. When you make an edit please leave an accurate edit summary, and not a misleading one. You can be blocked for this. Further vandalism will get you blocked from editing without further notice. 7&6=thirteen () 13:56, 19 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Stop icon This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on other people again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Katietalk 14:13, 19 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sigh, your minions Katie, delete accurate information because it doesn't conform to their preconceived notions, or perhaps because I make fun of their self-importance. Either way, I believe wikipedia's interest is in accuracy, not the egos of its brownshirts.

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Stop icon with clock
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked temporarily from editing for making personal attacks towards other editors. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Katietalk 14:28, 19 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hurricane enrique (August 19)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Mz7 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Mz7 (talk) 05:08, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Teahouse logo
Hello! 104.152.214.35, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Mz7 (talk) 05:08, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hurricane Barbara (September 7)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by WikiPancake was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
WikiPancake 📖 15:26, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

September 2016[edit]

Information icon Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Draft:Hurricane Barbara, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. WikiPancake 📖 14:42, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

AfC notification: Draft:Hurricane Barbara has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Hurricane Barbara. Thanks! Boomer VialHolla! We gonna ball! 09:12, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Hurricane enrique, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:35, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Hurricane enrique[edit]

Hello, 104.152.214.35. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Hurricane enrique".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Jason Rees (talk) 16:21, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]