User talk:115.66.21.132

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GameRankings[edit]

Lordtobi is correct. Please read WP:VGAGG, a part of the Manual of Style for video games. GameRankings should not be included for most modern games, especially where the score essentially overlaps Metacritic. Both GR and MC are owned by the same company and nearly always have the same score these days, so we don't need both. -- ferret (talk) 12:29, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

However, that doesn't proved to accept that he is going to accept some sources had reliable links claimed to be proven evidence. 115.66.21.132 (talk) 12:34, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The reliability of GameRankings was never the issue and I never contested it. The problem is its redundancy against Metacritic, because of which the VGAGG guideline exists. Lordtobi () 12:37, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not sure what you meant here, "proved to accept", "claimed to be proven evidence"? Meaning no offense but I can't follow the grammar, could you better explain what you're referring to? The last edit on Rage that I can see was only about GR reviews, and removing them is the appropriate action for MOS:VG. Are there other sources you're trying to include? -- ferret (talk) 12:38, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]