User talk:11likelive

January 2024

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Talk:Marie Curie, you may be blocked from editing. Cannolis (talk) 22:06, 3 January 2024 (UTC)

A final warning

Please do not perform page moves like you did at Marie Curie without prior consensus. The consensus is to follow the common name. Read dispute resolution instead of causing disruption. Any further disruption will result in a block. 0xDeadbeef→∞ (talk to me) 14:12, 20 January 2024 (UTC)

You should follow WP:BRD 11likelive. Your changes don't conform to Wikipedia's manual of style. StephenMacky1 (talk) 14:55, 20 January 2024 (UTC)

So what

Her common name is not her REAL name

let me remind you about some history

One of many wikipedia’s fault is refering merchant flag as official austrian-hungarian flag only because it was „common” 11likelive (talk) 15:00, 20 January 2024 (UTC)

Resolution set between who:

a coupé of english moderators with power to ban anyone who doesnt agree? 11likelive (talk) 15:02, 20 January 2024 (UTC)

Your complaint is valid outside this website, but not here. Wikipedia has its own rules and is not the place to right great wrongs. If you don't follow and respect these rules, such as putting content without consensus of editors, or moving the article without prior discussion, then you are causing disruption.

If you fail to recognize that we're all humans trying to work together, as well as trying to work with you here, and instead believes that we're all out here to enforce our own agendas, you're just being unreasonable, confrontational, and accusatory for no reason. 0xDeadbeef→∞ (talk to me) 15:32, 20 January 2024 (UTC)

Remember that about 95% of the population with access to internet uses Wikipedia for many purposes, including discussions, lessons at schools etc.

if wiki contains invalid information, the misinformation spreads like cancer

So please, stop reverting wiki to its invalid state. 11likelive (talk) 16:28, 20 January 2024 (UTC)

January 2024

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  --Blablubbs (talk) 16:45, 20 January 2024 (UTC)

Unban

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

11likelive (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Well, lets start from the beginning. The article about Marie Skłodowska-Curie has a couple of invalid informations, including title. After many times trying to communicate with editors and being neglected, I decided to rush edits so I can correct it myself. It’s worth mentioning that I am not only one to argue about this, and that many times the discussion is simply deleted by mods. Upon seeing my edits revoked I decided to undo revokes and reason. And a couple of undoing revokes and talking to myself, also on private chats, here we are. I know I broke a couple of rules, yet given the fact that they protect misleading information based on their beliefs, I don’t regret. Yet once I am unblocked, the first thing I am doing is continuing my efforts, but instead of punching a wall with my head, I shall try somewhere higher than them11likelive (talk) 17:21, 20 January 2024 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. once I am unblocked, the first thing I am doing is continuing my efforts does not convince me at all that you won't continue your disruptive behavior. 0xDeadbeef→∞ (talk to me) 18:05, 20 January 2024 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

11likelive (talk) 17:21, 20 January 2024 (UTC)