User talk:152.157.4.41

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
To edit, please log in.

Editing by unregistered users from your shared IP address or address range may be currently disabled due to abuse. However, you are still able to edit if you sign in with an account. If you are currently blocked from creating an account, and cannot create one elsewhere in the foreseeable future, you may follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Request an account to request that volunteers create your username for you. Please use an email address issued to you by your ISP, school or organization so that we may verify that you are a legitimate user on this network. Please reference this block in the comment section of the form.

Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. We apologize for any inconvenience.

Please stop removing content from Wikipedia; it is considered vandalism. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Sango123 (e) 20:49, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Bulgaria at the 2004 Summer Olympics. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. --Krich (talk) 21:35, 31 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edit to Bulgaria at the 2004 Summer Olympics was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept our apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot2 20:36, 4 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Ezra Pound. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Mhking 15:47, 5 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to MPPP[edit]

Your recent edit to MPPP was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot2 20:51, 15 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Crayfish[edit]

Please stop. If you continue to blank or remove content from Wikipedia, as you did to Crayfish, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Molerat 16:46, 17 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to A Whole New World. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. joturner 23:32, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Governor of North Carolina, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. joturner 23:33, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for experimenting with the page Hydrogen vehicle on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you for your understanding. Mwanner | Talk 20:09, 2 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Hydrogen vehicle[edit]

Your recent edit to Hydrogen vehicle was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot2 17:35, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Classical architecture, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. —Mets501talk 22:00, 9 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to Paganism, are considered vandalism. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the hard work of others. Thanks. Jkelly 17:21, 15 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Christopher Columbus[edit]

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. - Fan-1967 20:35, 14 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your vandalism to Mapp v. Ohio[edit]

Please to not vandalize articles on U.S. Supreme Court cases. By doing so you distract people from learning about their legal rights. Cdogsimmons 19:45, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Tinian[edit]

Your recent edit to Tinian (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 20:46, 9 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Blatant vandal[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. Yuser31415 00:06, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edit[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Babe Ruth, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. —Wknight94 (talk) 14:46, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not delete content from pages on Wikipedia. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use Wikipedia:Sandbox for test edits. Thank you. --TeaDrinker 21:02, 27 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning.
The next time you delete or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia, as you did to Cuba, you will be blocked from editing. —DerHexer (Talk) 21:02, 27 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

October 2007[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass, an American Slave. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Rhopkins8 16:06, 4 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Cotton Mather, you will be blocked from editing. Flex (talk/contribs) 20:37, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Vandalism to Chemical polarity[edit]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Chemical polarity, you will be blocked from editing. Your changes have been automatically reverted by CounterVandalismBot. If this is a mistake, please report it. Thank you. CounterVandalismBot 20:21, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to 1980 eruption of Mount St. Helens, you will be blocked from editing. Excirial 18:39, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Educational institution IP address
To edit, please create an account at home and log in with it here.

Due to persistent vandalism, anonymous editing from your school, library, or educational institution's IP address may be blocked (disabled). You will continue to have access to read the encyclopedia. If you are logged in but still unable to edit, please follow these instructions. To prevent abuse, account creation via this IP address might also be disabled.

If account creation is disabled and you are unable to create an account elsewhere, you can request one by following the instructions at Wikipedia:Request an account. Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. If editing is required for class projects, please have your instructor or network administrator contact us (with reference to this IP address) at the Unblock Ticket Request System with a contact email address that is listed on your school's website. Thank you for your cooperation.

You have been temporarily blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

Ian Cairns 18:41, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

November 2007[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to The Wife of Bath's Prologue and Tale. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Anthøny 22:12, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Joseph Schenck. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. —slakrtalk / 22:05, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Brown tree snake, you will be blocked from editing. Dougz1 (talk) 22:14, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Brown tree snake, you will be blocked from editing. AFUSCO 22:21, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the page Beetle worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Gscshoyru (talk) 16:24, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Starling. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Caltas (talk) 18:41, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Starling, you will be blocked from editing. Caltas (talk) 18:43, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. KnowledgeOfSelf | talk 18:45, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

December 2007[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to Smoking ban, are considered vandalism and immediately reverted. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. —LOL (talk) 21:44, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Smoking ban. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. ffm 22:20, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

January 2008[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Starling, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Starling was changed by 152.157.4.41 (c) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2008-01-09T18:30:39+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 18:31, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Brown tree snake. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Crazy Boris with a red beard (talk) 20:30, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Your recent edit to Nitrous (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II (talk) 20:55, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edit to Lowrider (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II (talk) 19:11, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edit to Nitrous (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II (talk) 20:12, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have been temporarily blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. —Wknight94 (talk) 20:13, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

February 2008[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from List of mental illnesses. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. SMS Talk 16:35, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, the recent edit you made to Gaara has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Dycedarg ж 17:09, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

March 2008[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Oak Hill Academy (Virginia), did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Oak Hill Academy (Virginia) was changed by 152.157.4.41 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2008-03-04T22:45:22+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 22:45, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, the recent edit you made to Fusion power has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Antonio Lopez (talk) 16:36, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to Fusion power constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. ·Add§hore· Talk/Cont 16:50, 7 March 2008 (UTC))[reply]

Your recent edit to The Gods Must Be Crazy (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II (talk) 16:07, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to The Gods Must Be Crazy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. GtstrickyTalk or C 16:10, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Olly150 16:14, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism and immediately reverted. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Cheers. Trance addict - Tiesto - Above and Beyond 20:55, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hi, the recent edit you made to December 21 has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Captain panda 21:32, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

April 2008[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Hotel Rwanda, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Hotel Rwanda was changed by 152.157.4.41 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2008-04-01T12:10:15+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 16:10, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to Hotel Rwanda constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. ·Add§hore· Talk/Cont 16:11, 1 April 2008 (UTC))[reply]


Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to History of Canada, you will be blocked from editing. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: History of Canada was changed by 152.157.4.41 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2008-04-01T15:07:55+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 19:08, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]


This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Ima Hogg, you will be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Ima Hogg was changed by 152.157.4.41 (u) (t) blanking the page on 2008-04-01T15:08:42+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 19:08, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for the rest of the school year[edit]

Educational institution IP address
To edit, please create an account at home and log in with it here.

Due to persistent vandalism, anonymous editing from your school, library, or educational institution's IP address may be blocked (disabled). You will continue to have access to read the encyclopedia. If you are logged in but still unable to edit, please follow these instructions. To prevent abuse, account creation via this IP address might also be disabled.

If account creation is disabled and you are unable to create an account elsewhere, you can request one by following the instructions at Wikipedia:Request an account. Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. If editing is required for class projects, please have your instructor or network administrator contact us (with reference to this IP address) at the Unblock Ticket Request System with a contact email address that is listed on your school's website. Thank you for your cooperation.

NawlinWiki (talk) 19:10, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

July 2008[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Typoglycemia, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Typoglycemia was changed by 152.157.4.41 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2008-07-16T18:39:00+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 18:39, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to Typoglycemia constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. Rror (talk) 18:41, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Typoglycemia. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Rror (talk) 18:42, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

October 2008[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to United States presidential nominating convention has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Stwalkerstertalk ] 22:30, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia articles even if your ultimate intention is to fix them. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. JNW (talk) 16:28, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Watchman. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to blocking of editing privileges. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. – sampi (talkcontribemail) 18:10, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

December 2008[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to History of Seattle before 1900 has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. LeaveSleaves talk 16:53, 4 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Food coloring has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Oliver Fury, Esq. message • contributions 21:30, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Firefighter. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Jclemens (talk) 21:35, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding edits made during December 11 2008 (UTC)[edit]

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to the NSA warrantless surveillance controversy page. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. If this is an IP address, and it is shared by multiple users, ignore this warning if you did not make the edit(s) to which this warning refers. John254 20:00, 11 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

January 2009[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to History of abortion. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Dawn Bard (talk) 19:42, 12 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Right to keep and bear arms, you will be blocked from editing. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Right to keep and bear arms was changed by 152.157.4.41 (u) (t) deleting 12262 characters on 2009-01-13T16:10:00+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 16:10, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]


This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Amado Carrillo Fuentes, you will be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Amado Carrillo Fuentes was changed by 152.157.4.41 (u) (t) blanking the page on 2009-01-13T16:11:11+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 16:11, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

March 2010[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Tukwila, Washington, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot.

  • Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • Cluebot produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Tukwila, Washington was changed by 152.157.4.41 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2010-03-16T18:16:19+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 18:16, 16 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

April 2010[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Talk:World War I. Your edits constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. TREKphiler any time you're ready, Uhura 21:04, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to List of banned video games. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Wikipelli Talk 17:51, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Turner syndrome. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Wikipelli Talk 16:45, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 year for repeated abuse of editing privileges. Please stop. You are welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. gadfium 20:02, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

June 2011[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Nebraska . Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Pinethicket (talk) 17:07, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

September 2011[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Socialism. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Pinethicket (talk) 17:47, 30 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Democracy. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Dave Dial (talk) 18:26, 30 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

February 2013[edit]

Hello, I'm Spencer. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made to Fernando Colunga, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, SpencerT♦C 21:35, 6 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

April 2013[edit]

Hello, I'm DouglasCalvert. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Winona LaDuke because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! DouglasCalvert (talk) 17:07, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

December 2013[edit]

Hello, I'm MelbourneStar. I noticed that you recently removed all content from Sgt. Slaughter, with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, I restored the page's content. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. —MelbourneStartalk 03:40, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

March 2014[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Ubiquity. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Swedish cuisine because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! ubiquity (talk) 20:22, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

May 2014[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Wikipelli. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Nutter, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Wikipelli Talk 18:01, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 years for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  gadfium 00:25, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

January 2022[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Juan Alvarez (soccer)—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Serols (talk) 16:48, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

May 2022[edit]

Stop icon This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Second Sino-Japanese War, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Loafiewa (talk) 16:38, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

September 2022[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm BerkBerk68. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Seafood have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. BerkBerk68 20:26, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Shawarma, you may be blocked from editing. Cut it out. Julietdeltalima (talk) 20:55, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Alaungsithu. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 16:42, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 year for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  gadfium 21:09, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]