User talk:153.230.238.91

Stop

Please stop restoring your badly written content. The English is poor and it is WP:UNDUE. Also see WP:3RR.104.163.159.237 (talk) 21:32, 6 May 2018 (UTC)

Your content is badly written and non-neutral. Please stop adding it back and removing the NPOV tag from the section.104.163.159.237 (talk) 23:30, 6 May 2018 (UTC)

Notice of Neutral point of view noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 104.163.159.237 (talk) 23:34, 6 May 2018 (UTC)

What is your problem?

Are you having some problems understanding this process? You are way past three reverts. To be clear: a) your copy is not neutral, it makes assumptions and conclusions about his actions that are not relevant and it also slants the POV towards a non-neutral portrayal. Second, the English in your edits is poor. SO what is your problem, do you have a basic comprehension issue, where you do not understand things?104.163.159.237 (talk) 23:59, 6 May 2018 (UTC)

Do you speak English?104.163.159.237 (talk) 00:15, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

Edit warring

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

You and the other user have both gone way beyond 3RR in your edit warring at Nobuyoshi Araki. I have protected the page for two days to encourage you to work it out on the talk page. If you resume edit warring when the protection expires, you are likely to be blocked. --MelanieN (talk) 01:05, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

---