User talk:165.16.20.39

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

August 2023[edit]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Garamantes. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. M.Bitton (talk) 08:09, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@M.Bitton it won't let me talk in the talk page 165.16.20.39 (talk) 10:44, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@M.Bitton so I'm gonna say it here 165.16.20.39 (talk) 10:44, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@M.Bitton okay first of all boundaries and certainty of claims alright origin of the Garamantes examine chariots pottery and other aspect if the Garamantes and suggest they rose around 3000 to 2000 bce period 165.16.20.39 (talk) 10:45, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@M.Bitton one of the sources that is Egyptian research suggest the Garamantes started with libyco berber inscriptions in Sahara in wadi ajal the analysis is long and Wikipedia doesn't allow me to well put links but it suggest that the libyco berber and Garamantes started 3500 bce 165.16.20.39 (talk) 10:48, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@M.Bitton and the article changing places: rock arts and holocene landscapes in wadi ajal suggest due to archeological remains that garamantes could've started from 3500 bc 165.16.20.39 (talk) 10:50, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@M.Bitton the trans saharan trade book suggest Garamantes started from second melineum bce but that sources is one I doubt becuase it say proto Garamantian civilization. 165.16.20.39 (talk) 10:51, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Please stop pinging me! If you can't edit the article's talk page (I don't see why), then you need to ask an admin to look into the issue. M.Bitton (talk) 10:52, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@M.Bitton sorry but I need to write explanation i hope I didn't annoy you 165.16.20.39 (talk) 10:54, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@M.Bitton please read 165.16.20.39 (talk) 10:56, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@M.Bitton the mysterious Garamantes that lived in the green Sahara also suggests the Garamantes started around the 3500 period when the Sahara was green 165.16.20.39 (talk) 10:53, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Since you refuse to stop pinging me, I have now muted your talk page (I will no longer receive pings from it). Feel free to do as I suggested (to look into the issue of why you can't edit the article's talk page). M.Bitton (talk) 11:01, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@M.Bitton but did you read explanation? 165.16.20.39 (talk) 11:06, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@M.Bitton and sorry won't do it again 165.16.20.39 (talk) 11:06, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@M.Bitton at least read and respond if they reliable or not but you didn't 165.16.20.39 (talk) 15:37, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion[edit]

Information icon Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:165.16.20.39 reported by User:M.Bitton (Result: ). Thank you. M.Bitton (talk) 12:07, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Daniel Case (talk) 18:06, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

May i get unbanned[edit]

@Courcelles 165.16.20.39 (talk) 19:14, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]