User talk:172.111.135.192

Hello, you seem to be having a problem with understanding Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources. Let me see if I can help you.

1. YouTube isn't a reliable source
2. YouTube isn't a reliable source
3. YouTube isn't a reliable source
4. YouTube isn't a reliable source
5. YouTube isn't a reliable source
6. YouTube isn't a reliable source
7. YouTube isn't a reliable source
8. YouTube isn't a reliable source
9. YouTube isn't a reliable source
10. Wikipedia isn't a reliable source
11. Wikipedia isn't a reliable source
12. Wikipedia isn't a reliable source
13. Wikipedia isn't a reliable source
14. Wikipedia isn't a reliable source
15. Wikipedia isn't a reliable source
16. Wikiquote isn't a reliable source
17. Facebbok isn't a reliable source
18. Life Positive is a blog, not a reliable source
19. Life Positive is a blog, not a reliable source
20. Life Positive is a blog, not a reliable source
21. Life Positive is a blog, not a reliable source
22. Life Positive is a blog, not a reliable source
23. Life Positive is a blog, not a reliable source
24. Life Positive is a blog, not a reliable source
25. Life Positive is a blog, not a reliable source
26. Life Positive is a blog, not a reliable source
27. Life Positive is a blog, not a reliable source
28. Life Positive is a blog, not a reliable source
29. Life Positive is a blog, not a reliable source
30. You need to ask yourself "Does speakingtree.in have a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy?"
31. You need to ask yourself "Does amarujala.com have a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy?"
32. A blank page at mtv.com is unlikely to be a reliable source
33. The Hindu is likely to be a reliable source
34. The BBC is likely to be a reliable source

Can you spot the ones that you need to use? Hope that helps. --RexxS (talk) 18:32, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

---