User talk:172.79.69.94

Your submission at Articles for creation: Luke Van Mol (December 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by David.moreno72 were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Luke Van Mol and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Luke Van Mol, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

David.moreno72 05:26, 15 December 2019 (UTC)

Hello, 172.79.69.94! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! David.moreno72 05:26, 15 December 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Luke Van Mol (December 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by HickoryOughtShirt?4 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Luke Van Mol and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Luke Van Mol, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 02:06, 16 December 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Ron Paul Curriculum

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Ron Paul Curriculum, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. DGG ( talk ) 04:50, 16 December 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Draft: Ron Paul Curriculum

@DGG:

1. I was not nearly finished with the draft, and did NOT send it in for review. I simply wanted to close it so I hit Publish and typed in the changes thing that I did NOT want to submit it yet, but that I wasn't sure if it'd submit.

2. The reason it seemed 'advertisy' is because I copied and pasted it from something I wrote a long time ago for fun. I decided to revise it, which I had only just started doing when I saved it, only to find it speedy-deletioned when I returned. Anyway, it is not supposed to be an advertisment, and what's funny is that the original wasn't supposed to be either, but I wasn't bound by rules at the time, so yeah, I was just going to edit this alot. I did not mean to submit it yet, and I even specified that, you just didn't see that I suppose. Anyway, yeah, please don't delete it, its not nearly done!

Also, my IP address changes sometimes, and my old one was 172.17.88.139, so edits by that address were by me also.

172.79.69.94 (talk) 05:05, 16 December 2019 (UTC)

what you need to do is to place this statement on the talk page of the draft, and the admin who checks to do the actual deletion will see it. DGG ( talk ) 05:10, 16 December 2019 (UTC)

The reason things like this get deleted is that it's far easier to write a suitable draft from nothing than it would be from that text, which was wholly unsuitable for Wikipedia. WilyD 08:51, 16 December 2019 (UTC)

Minor note: the range 172.16.0.0 to 172.31.255.255 is a private-use address space (like 196.168.* and 10.*), and those generally should not be able to be routed outside your local network, so your previous address visible to Wikipedia was likely not 172.17.88.139. —[AlanM1(talk)]— 02:04, 18 December 2019 (UTC)

You're right, my IP was actually 172.77.18.139 (As you can see it has changed again) 50.120.11.188 (talk) 20:07, 21 January 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Trial 47 (December 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Trial 47 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Trial 47, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 17:56, 16 December 2019 (UTC)

Trial 47

Draft:Trial 47 will be Declined again, because IMBd and YouTube are not considered accepted references. Either find good refs or give up. As for Ron Paul, Draft space is considered public, even if not submitted. Ditto working on a draft in your Sandbox. Admins can reach in and trash something if in their opinion it has no potential for becoming an article. Brutal? Yes. David notMD (talk) 02:10, 18 December 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Trial 47 (December 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Trial 47 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Trial 47, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 02:33, 18 December 2019 (UTC)

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, 172.79.69.94. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by DES ^(talk)_{DESiegel Contribs} 16:11, 18 December 2019 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).

Your thread has been archived

Hi 172.79.69.94! You created a thread called (regarding IP Address User Page) at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread. Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 21 December 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Trial 47 concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Trial 47, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:40, 19 May 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Trial 47

Hello, 172.79.69.94. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Trial 47".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! JMHamo (talk) 11:08, 18 June 2020 (UTC)

---