User talk:184.180.217.57
Welcome![edit]
deleted an anon user warning for it was proven correct as of 6:17 pm est or 11:17 pm uct Again, welcome! Megabits000 (talk) 16:01, 17 November 2023 (UTC)
- Hey @Megabits000, you've got this one wrong. I'm an anon user by choice of many years and my IP is not permanent. I was the one who requested pp and attempted to address the issues with the content per WP standards and style. The user you are providing a warning for was making disruptive edits that continued to escalate into stonewalling and targeting my edits for no reason other than to undo any edits I made with no reason for reversion. The user made their account yesterday and has only made questionable edits to Rebekah Jones. 184.180.217.57 (talk) 20:07, 17 November 2023 (UTC)
- ill review and get back to you in at most an hour, at least 5-10. if @184.180.217.57 is correct, i'll rescind the warning and blank this out. and also possibly address the other issue of the 1 day old user. no matter the result of my findings, thank you for correcting me, and for being vigilant! Megabits000 (talk) 22:46, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
- ok, so I'm going to take back my welcome(warning) but I do recommend that instead of continuing to edit warn/respond to stonewalling, you fill out a report for an edit warring user(s). A sockpuppeting report is another option, but I do not feel that a sockpuppeting report would go anywhere in this case. slightly suspicious that the two users ere editing at the same time, suspiciously joined a day or two before then, 10-odd minutes apart. if as you said, "many years," I'm going to assume you know how to do this, but if your dont, or need any other help feel free to contact me (not Saturdays) and i will try and assist. Megabits000 (talk) 23:14, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
- I didn't suspect the other user, but I see what you mean. I think I took the appropriate steps for the information/time I had (used proper edit messages, moved to talk page, addressed other content not in the dispute, stopped editing, requested page protection, made edit requests)
- I think we should wait out the page protection and see if they return, as often times the trolls will lose interest from the lack of access. 184.180.217.57 (talk) 14:05, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
- ok, so I'm going to take back my welcome(warning) but I do recommend that instead of continuing to edit warn/respond to stonewalling, you fill out a report for an edit warring user(s). A sockpuppeting report is another option, but I do not feel that a sockpuppeting report would go anywhere in this case. slightly suspicious that the two users ere editing at the same time, suspiciously joined a day or two before then, 10-odd minutes apart. if as you said, "many years," I'm going to assume you know how to do this, but if your dont, or need any other help feel free to contact me (not Saturdays) and i will try and assist. Megabits000 (talk) 23:14, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
- ill review and get back to you in at most an hour, at least 5-10. if @184.180.217.57 is correct, i'll rescind the warning and blank this out. and also possibly address the other issue of the 1 day old user. no matter the result of my findings, thank you for correcting me, and for being vigilant! Megabits000 (talk) 22:46, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
 | This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address. |