User talk:192.77.143.167

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

January 2008[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. A contribution you made to Palestine Liberation Organization‎ appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe our core policies. Thank you.--Kubigula (talk) 06:00, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.
192.77.143.167 (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))
192.77.143.167 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "THE UBER GREATEST". The reason given for THE UBER GREATEST's block is: "Vandalism-only account".


Decline reason: Address currently being used by blocked vandal. — Yamla (talk) 03:57, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

April 2008[edit]

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did to Nancy Pelosi, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Loonymonkey (talk) 19:28, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
My contribution toward Nancy Pelosi regarding her trip to Syria was done trying to make the article more neutral, not more biased as you claim. The article is full of information regarding the trip, but there was no information regarding the criticism she received, which would be necessary in order to maintain the NPOV. Otherwise, the article would clearly be slanted to the left. I do not appreciate being threatened for trying to improve the article and I would politely ask that you remove the warning from my page. Thank you. 192.77.143.167 (talk) 20:59, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
You should probably re-read the policies to learn what neutral point of view actually is. You are saying that if you are not allowed to add your point of view for "balance" then an article will not be NPOV. That is completely incorrect. The goal is to keep all POV out of the article, not to add POV from both sides. As for the edits you made, no reasonable editor would consider it NPOV to refer to Nancy Pelosi as the "Damascus Diva" and a "terrorist sympathizer" as you did. Those sort of inflammatory POV statements (whether yours or Sean Hannity's) do not have a place in a biography of a living person. --Loonymonkey (talk) 00:54, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The WP:AIV noticeboard is for the reporting of obvious and persistent vandalism only. Your content dispute with Loonymonkey does not apply. Please follow established dispute resolution processes for dealing with this conflict, not making false claims of vandalism. Trusilver 21:47, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Just to let you know...[edit]

I thought you would like to know that Loonymonkey doesn't have administrator rights.--KerotanLeave Me a Message Have a nice day :) 22:10, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

December 2012[edit]

Hello, I'm Jim1138. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Lars Ulrich, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Jim1138 (talk) 07:47, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]