User talk:209.247.22.139

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your edit to Alligator Alley[edit]

Please do not add unhelpful and non-constructive information to Wikipedia, as you did to Alligator Alley. Your edits could be considered vandalism, and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Crashintome4196 22:11, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

February 2008[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Rufus Stokes, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Rufus Stokes was changed by 209.247.22.139 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2008-02-24T20:01:35+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 20:01, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

April 2008[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Lauren London, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Lauren London was changed by 209.247.22.139 (u) (t) making a minor change adding "!!!" on 2008-04-09T20:18:43+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 20:18, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

April 2008[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Effects of global warming, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Effects of global warming was changed by 209.247.22.139 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2008-04-21T23:32:06+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 23:32, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

September 2008[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Shot heard round the world has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Epbr123 (talk) 00:31, 13 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

November 2008[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Green Party (United States) has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you.   — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 18:07, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

February 2009[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page John Coltrane has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Inferno, Lord of Penguins 00:51, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

May 2010[edit]

This is the only warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to Mastication, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Mokele (talk) 23:47, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Hi. Please do not add original research to articles, as you did with your edits to Luciana Carro, here and here, as this violates Wikipedia's policies of No Original Research and Verifiability. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please make sure you include sources that meet our policies when adding material to articles. Please make sure you cite a reliable source for all of the information you add or re-add to articles. Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 00:10, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below; but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

Materialscientist (talk) 02:08, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the only warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to Mastication, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Please die in a fire. Mokele (talk) 01:58, 17 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at User:Mokele, you may be blocked from editing. Caltas (talk) 08:38, 18 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at User:Mokele, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Caltas (talk) 08:39, 18 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.
You have been temporarily blocked from editing for attempting to harass other users. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Tonywalton Talk 08:43, 18 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

209.247.22.139 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

User Mokeletold me to pleae die i a fire. I would like for him to be blocked because of this. That is a personal attack. this is why i attacked him. telling me to die in a fire gets him nothing? I protest!

Decline reason:

This IP address has a massive history of vandalism. Although "please die in a fire" was inappropriate, YOUR responsibility as an editor is to deal with it properly at WP:WQA, and not harass them for it. They have been since advised that it was improper, which is the right way to deal with it. Unfortunately, your harassment of them escalated to this edit, which is inexcusable in any situation. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 09:56, 18 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Please supply evidence for your accusation. I can't find any diff where such a statement is made. Tonywalton Talk 08:55, 18 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Found it. I and another admin have told Mokele never to repeat this behaviour, however since your repeated vandalism for a week prior to the edit to which you object was the trigger in the first place, your block still stands as far as I'm concerned. I'm leaving the unblock request in place should another admin differ on this; reviewing admin, please feel free to remove or alter the block on this IP without reference to me - I won't accuse another admin of wheel-warring. Tonywalton Talk 09:15, 18 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
You have been temporarily blocked from editing for attempting to harass other users. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

--EncycloPetey (talk) 03:18, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]