User talk:216.51.215.225

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your recent edit to Harper Lee was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept our apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot2 18:40, 21 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]


May 2007[edit]

Please do not add unhelpful and unconstructive content to Wikipedia, as you did to Bridge of Hope. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Caltas 20:00, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Christian Reformed Church in North America, you will be blocked from editing. Jonpro 19:58, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.


This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Maurice, Iowa, you will be blocked from editing. Hut 8.5 20:20, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Maurice, Iowa, you will be blocked from editing. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. — Pill (talk) 20:15, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to KB. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. JohnHarris 20:12, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Maurice, Iowa, you will be blocked from editing. Nyttend 23:03, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

October 2007[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Kwsn (Ni!) 22:23, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2007[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to KB, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. -- Jab843 (talk) 21:16, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to the Kent page. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Regan123 (talk) 20:30, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

January 2008[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde (1941 film), did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde (1941 film) was changed by 216.51.215.225 (c) (t) making a minor change adding "!!!" on 2008-01-04T18:35:54+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 18:36, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde (1941 film), you will be blocked from editing. --PhantomS (talk) 07:31, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

February 2008[edit]

Your recent edit to Hoosiers (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II (talk) 19:31, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to Hoosiers constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. Snowolf How can I help? 19:33, 1 February 2008 (UTC))[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Hoosiers. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Snowolf How can I help? 19:34, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Osprey. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Natalie (talk) 15:55, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, the recent edit you made to Minnesota Vikings has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. —DerHexer (Talk) 21:08, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to Harlem Renaissance constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. WEBURIEDOURSECRETSINTHEGARDEN aka john lennon 21:09, 29 February 2008 (UTC))[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Duke Ellington. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. WEBURIEDOURSECRETSINTHEGARDEN aka john lennon 21:16, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

April 2008[edit]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to War in Darfur, you will be blocked from editing. ... richi (hello) 21:24, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

May 2008[edit]

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing.

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. WODUP 18:36, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

September 2008[edit]

Your recent edit to Apostles' Creed (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! (Report bot mistakes here) // VoABot II (talk) 18:43, 10 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edit to Montanism (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! (Report bot mistakes here) // VoABot II (talk) 18:47, 10 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Montanism. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. ukexpat (talk) 18:47, 10 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Gnosticism. ukexpat (talk) 18:50, 10 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

December 2008[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Cerebellum has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Mygerardromance (talk) 14:49, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to System software has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Mygerardromance (talk) 19:11, 12 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to System software constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Cheers. Trance addict - Armin van Buuren - Oceanlab 19:12, 12 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to System software. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Cheers. Trance addict - Armin van Buuren - Oceanlab 19:13, 12 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

March 2009[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Lobster. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. —Snigbrook 21:14, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Lobster. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. QueenCake (talk) 21:15, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Lobster. QueenCake (talk) 21:16, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing Wikipedia for a period of 24 hours as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our policies concerning neutral point of view and biographies of living persons will not be tolerated. Postdlf (talk) 21:18, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

May 2009[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page After the First Death has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Jojhutton (talk) 19:43, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

October 2009[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to My Ántonia, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: My Ántonia was changed by 216.51.215.225 (u) (t) making a minor change adding "!!!" on 2009-10-16T16:55:00+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 16:55, 16 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. Wikipedia is not a social networking site. A little insignificant Talk to me! (I have candy!) 16:56, 16 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

December 2009[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Zorse has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. The thing that should not be 15:42, 4 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Zorse, you will be blocked from editing. NawlinWiki (talk) 16:04, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as those you made to Zorse. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. Philip Trueman (talk) 16:07, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below; but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

NawlinWiki (talk) 16:07, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

March 2010[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Josh Shipp, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot.

  • Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • Cluebot produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Josh Shipp was changed by 216.51.215.225 (u) (t) making a minor change adding "!!!" on 2010-03-22T18:06:41+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 18:06, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

December 2010[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Hand grenade. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Marcus Qwertyus 01:23, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Weapon of mass destruction. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.--CurtisSwain (talk) 01:51, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

January 2011[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Paul Klee. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. MANdARAX • XAЯAbИAM 20:27, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

February 2011[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to J. P. Morgan, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. GcSwRhIc (talk) 22:09, 16 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

October 2011[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Bean with this edit, did not appear to be constructive, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Wknight94 talk 18:56, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

March 2012[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Randy Feenstra, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. ÐℬigXЯaɣ 22:33, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

October 2012[edit]

Hello, I'm ESkog. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made to Massachusetts Bay Colony, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, (ESkog)(Talk) 16:26, 16 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Massachusetts Bay Colony with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. (ESkog)(Talk) 16:27, 16 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

November 2014[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Donner60. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Warhammer 40,000: Dawn of War – Dark Crusade— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Donner60 (talk) 23:09, 6 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

April 2015[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Ekips39. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Genetically modified crops without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ekips39 (talk) 16:12, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

January 2017[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Gilliam. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Epistle of James have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. – Gilliam (talk) 17:16, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at First Epistle to Timothy. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. – Gilliam (talk) 17:16, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Epistle of James, you may be blocked from editing. Aristophanes68 (talk) 23:20, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

September 2017[edit]

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. --Ixfd64 (talk) 17:14, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

October 2020[edit]

Please refrain from attempting to make unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been disallowed by an edit filter. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. CLCStudent (talk) 16:03, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

February 2021[edit]

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Sioux Center, Iowa, you may be blocked from editing. Mojoworker (talk) 22:08, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2022[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Hey man im josh. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Dating—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Hey man im josh (talk) 19:06, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

February 2024[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Philipnelson99. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to The Hunt in the Forest—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Philipnelson99 (talk) 20:09, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:216.51.215.225&oldid=1210672293"