User talk:24.159.223.134

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
To edit, please log in.

Editing by unregistered users from your shared IP address or address range may be currently disabled due to abuse. However, you are still able to edit if you sign in with an account. If you are currently blocked from creating an account, and cannot create one elsewhere in the foreseeable future, you may follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Request an account to request that volunteers create your username for you. Please use an email address issued to you by your ISP, school or organization so that we may verify that you are a legitimate user on this network. Please reference this block in the comment section of the form.

Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. We apologize for any inconvenience.

Welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. As a member of the Wikipedia community, I would like to remind you of Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy for editors, which you appear to have violated at Vegetarianism. In the meantime, please be bold and continue contributing to Wikipedia.--Kubigula (talk) 23:12, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unhelpful and non-constructive information to Wikipedia, as you did to Mental retardation. Your edits could be considered vandalism, and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. -FisherQueen (Talk) 15:50, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Loyola Catholic School, you will be blocked from editing. Chris Bradshaw 14:39, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, please ignore this warning


Please stop adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Ian. It is considered vandalism, which under Wikipedia policy, can lead to blocking of editing privileges. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Will (aka Wimt) 15:21, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice


This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Ian, you will be blocked from editing. Will (aka Wimt) 15:23, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice

He did it again on Lagos, reverted. Lio 20:09, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Sam, you will be blocked from editing. -SpuriousQ (talk) 14:35, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]


This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Sam, you will be blocked from editing. -SpuriousQ (talk) 14:36, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edit to Sam (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 14:40, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked[edit]

File:Nuvola apps kbluebox.png
You have been blocked from editing Wikipedia for a period of 24 hours for vandalism. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our neutral point of view policy will not be tolerated. – Riana 14:42, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

May 2007[edit]

Hi, the recent edit you made to Printing press has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Gurchzilla 15:18, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

June 2007[edit]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. -SpuriousQ (talk) 15:47, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

January 2008[edit]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did to List of saints, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Tanthalas39 (talk) 17:13, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Cue the Strings (talk) 16:52, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

April 2008[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Fred Rogers, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. NeilN talkcontribs 13:31, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

The recent edit you made to Jesse Crain constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. Prashanthns (talk) 13:47, 30 April 2008 (UTC))[reply]

May 2008[edit]

Hi, the recent edit you made to Nero has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Catgut (talk) 19:49, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

September 2008[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Carole King, did not appear to be constructive and has been removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. TNX-Man 15:19, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

December 2008[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Xmas has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. ♪TempoDiValse♪ 19:49, 18 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to Xmas constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. ♪TempoDiValse♪ 19:50, 18 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

February 2009[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Ben Goebel, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Ben Goebel was changed by 24.159.223.134 (u) (t) blanking the page on 2009-02-20T15:36:51+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 15:36, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to the page Ben Goebel constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. miquonranger03 (talk) 15:41, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

October 2009[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Mankato, Minnesota has been reverted, as it appears to introduce incorrect information. Please do not intentionally add incorrect information to articles. All information in this encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable, published source. If you believe the information that you added was correct, please cite the references or sources or before making the changes, discuss them on the article's talk page. Please use the sandbox for testing. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. ArakunemTalk 17:26, 9 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

November 2009[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Saltwater and freshwater economics, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot.

  • Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • Cluebot produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Saltwater and freshwater economics was changed by 24.159.223.134 (u) (t) making a minor change adding "!!!" on 2009-11-09T20:08:24+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 20:08, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Saltwater and freshwater economics. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. HamburgerRadio (talk) 20:13, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Saltwater and freshwater economics. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Alansohn (talk) 20:14, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

February 2010[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Jack Adams Award has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. MaenK.A.Talk 15:33, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

May 2010[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Antonio López de Santa Anna has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Bradjamesbrown (talk) 15:54, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

November 2010[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Bosnian War has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Caltas (talk) 19:47, 17 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to Andy Murray constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Caltas (talk) 19:51, 17 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not intentionally introduce incorrect information to pages, as you did with this edit to Battle for Dalmatia. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Guoguo12--Talk--  19:51, 17 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

December 2010[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Venezuela has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Piast93 (talk) 16:28, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Paul Robeson has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 (Contact) 15:12, 15 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

March 2011[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Hope has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Jncraton (talk) 20:13, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to Chicago White Sox constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Jncraton (talk) 20:13, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Minnesota. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Wikipelli Talk 20:15, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning; the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Paul Robeson, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 18:58, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

September 2011[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Hansel and Gretel with this edit, did not appear to be constructive, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Marek.69 talk 14:37, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

October 2011[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Theory of relativity has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Wikipelli Talk 14:23, 4 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Soul with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. A fluffernutter is a sandwich! (talk) 14:25, 4 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Adam and Eve with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. --Chris (talk) 14:25, 4 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the page The Salvation Army worked, and it has been reverted or removed. However, if you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox instead. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. ALLOCKE|talk 14:49, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

March 2012[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Talk:The Hunger Games with this edit, did not appear to be constructive, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. DVdm (talk) 16:42, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

April 2012[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Jack Adams (rugby union), did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Orphan Wiki (talk) 19:09, 10 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Jamie Langenbrunner. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.--blue520 14:11, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --blue520 14:14, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

May 2012[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Electromagnet with this edit. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. QU TalkQu 15:35, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Electromagnet with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. QU TalkQu 15:36, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Jamie Langenbrunner with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. QU TalkQu 15:43, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

October 2012[edit]

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Israel–Syria relations. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Hertz1888 (talk) 14:41, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2012[edit]

Hello, I'm ESkog. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made to Jefferson Airplane, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, (ESkog)(Talk) 18:45, 6 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Francis of Assisi, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Kansan (talk) 19:07, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Francis of Assisi, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Maniesansdelire 19:08, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 months for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. - Alexf(talk) 19:10, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

October 2013[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm DavidLeighEllis. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Nesquik because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! DavidLeighEllis (talk) 16:47, 14 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

December 2013[edit]

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Kazoo, you may be blocked from editing. —Mono·nomic 18:12, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Kazoo, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. —Mono·nomic 18:13, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Jezebel'sPonyobons mots 18:29, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

March 2014[edit]

Information icon Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Kazoo, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Poepkop (talk) 18:23, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, I'm Fraggle81. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Demon because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Fraggle81 (talk) 17:31, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

May 2014[edit]

Information icon Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 21:54, 9 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]