User talk:24.188.38.58

February 2017[edit]

Hello, I'm Adam9007. I noticed that in this edit to The Amazing Race 29, you removed all the content without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, I restored the page's content. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Adam9007 (talk) 01:11, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not blank pages, as you did with this edit to The Amazing Race 29, because it is considered vandalism; instead, use the sandbox for testing. If you think the page should be deleted, see here for what to do. Thank you. Adam9007 (talk) 01:16, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove all content from pages without explanation, as you did with this edit to The Amazing Race 29. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing. Adam9007 (talk) 01:22, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you blank a page, as you did with this edit to The Amazing Race 29. Adam9007 (talk) 01:26, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. NeilN ^{talk to me} 01:31, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

24.188.38.58 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I want to have an organized fan page for the upcoming season24.188.38.58 (talk) 01:37, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

We don't have fan pages - this is an encyclopedia. Also, your comment doesn't explain why you repeatedly blanked the page. PhilKnight (talk) 01:47, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

.

Hey PhilKnight you are nuts to be telling me this. There was no problems for the other seasons :(

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

24.188.38.58 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I would like to display information for the upcoming season and I left blank because I was thinking of ideas and gathering information to be able to be together as one whole. Please don't decline. I promise! 24.188.38.58 (talk) 01:57, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇} 04:58, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

.

Hi PhilKnight and Adam9007 and |NeilN I would like to thank Adam 9007 and Neil N for their time. But,Phil Knight I am very DISAPPOINTED WITH YOU . I want the TV series to become popular again. Based on how you treat me . Shows to me that I will use another better webpage and NOT YOU GUYS THANK U FOR LOSING A CUSTOMER. GOOD DAY! I will no longer use you if you continue the block. It's not fair!!!

February 2017[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to The Amazing Race 29 has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: The Amazing Race 29 was changed by 24.188.38.58 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.985919 on 2017-02-09T16:12:22+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:12, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 ↑↓

↑↓↓↓

Thank

April 2017[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to The Amazing Race 29 has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: The Amazing Race 29 was changed by 24.188.38.58 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.953627 on 2017-04-12T02:23:21+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 02:23, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Boo!

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to The Amazing Race 29. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Drewmutt (^ᴥ^) talk 02:43, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at The Amazing Race 29, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 02:16, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for personally attacking other editors. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. NeilN ^{talk to me} 19:31, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

{{unblock}}

Note to reviewing admin: Look at deleted contribs. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 01:55, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

{{unblock reviewed|reason=I did not mean to do this. I did this on purpose. Please unblock me for 2 weeks . I will never break those rules again.24.188.38.58 (talk) 01:57, 14 April 2017 (UTC)|decline=I believe the second sentence in your request. You can wait until your block is over. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇} 02:16, 14 April 2017 (UTC)}[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

24.188.38.58 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I did not mean to do this on purpose. I just wanted to make sure that the wiki was acruate for the upcoming episodes. I promise to never do this again . Please unblock me . This is an accident 24.188.38.58 (talk) 12:55, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You've been blocked for personal attacks or harassment. You haven't addressed this in your unblock request, except to bizarrely claim this was "an accident". If true, WP:CIR applies and you should probably refrain from editing Wikipedia even when the block expires. Yamla (talk) 13:05, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You are not permitted to alter a previously declined unblock request, though you are welcome to make a new one. --Yamla (talk) 14:11, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Furthermore, neither this nor this were accidental. --Yamla (talk) 14:13, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Amazing Race 30 (May 18)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Shadowowl was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Amazing Race 30 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

» Shadowowl | talk 07:04, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! 24.188.38.58, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! » Shadowowl | talk 07:04, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Amazing Race 30 (May 19)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Shadowowl was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Amazing Race 30 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

» Shadowowl | talk 10:20, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

May 2017[edit]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at The Amazing Race 29. --Yamla (talk) 20:01, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

June 2017[edit]

May 2017[edit]

Please stop making disruptive edits.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 00:23, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

24.188.38.58 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I updated Amazing Race 30 for the upcoming premiere and recording I did not create patent pages at all. I was just editing for the Amazing Race page 24.188.38.58 (talk) 21:15, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Considering the comment below, I have revoked your ability to edit this page for the duration of the block. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 21:28, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

If you ever not unblock me you will be reported as trash s--t

Draft:The Amazing Race 30 concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:The Amazing Race 30, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:33, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

December 2017[edit]

Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at The Amazing Race 30.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 00:47, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

24.188.38.58 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i had not done anything wrong please unblock me now. :-( 24.188.38.58 (talk) 22:22, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

If you are unable to see how your edits are disruptive then I feel that for reasons of competence unblock is not appropriate.--Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 22:34, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.