User talk:24691358r

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

A cup of hot tea to welcome you!

Hello, 24691358r, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, or you can click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! We are so glad you are here! Jim1138 (talk) 08:08, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You removed content w/o explaining why and your image exceeds the recommended sizing. See wp:images for a list of policy, help, and tutorials. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 08:08, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

February 2017

Information icon Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Tetris, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. - GB fan 17:12, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Tetris. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. McGeddon (talk) 17:55, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

May 2017

Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at Tetris.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. -- ferret (talk) 17:32, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Tetris. You've been doing this for several months now. Take your concerns to the talk page. Changing "light grey" to "dark white" for example is nonsensical. I'm tempted to treat this as outright vandalism but you have one more chance to use the talk page and seek consensus. -- ferret (talk) 15:08, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The main reason for this change is because of the colors themselves. It makes no sense for every game to use 7FFF00 and never 00FF00.

August 2017

Information icon Hello, I'm Hayman30. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Scratch (programming language)— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Hayman30 (talk) 07:55, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Scratch (programming language). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Hayman30 (talk) 07:57, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

September 2017

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. Deli nk (talk) 11:24, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Other users blanking their talk pages

With very few exceptions (listed in WP:BLANKING), a user may remove messages from his talk page as he sees fit. Please stop re-adding messages, as this could be interpreted as harassment – a blockable offence. Favonian (talk) 15:04, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

These are warnings, they can't be deleted. 24691358r (talk) 16:47, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Guess you didn't read the link I included. You now have a couple of days of peace and quiet in which to catch up with your reading. Favonian (talk) 17:32, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

September 2017

Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for contravening Wikipedia's harassment policy, as you did at User talk:Deli nk. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Favonian (talk) 17:30, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Due to your behavior while blocked, I have extended the expiration of the block to indefinite. If you can articulate an understanding of Wikipedia's norms/policies and a willingness to abide by them, an unblock can be considered. -- Ed (Edgar181) 16:22, 20 September 2017 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

24691358r (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


UTRS appeal #19292 was submitted on Sep 21, 2017 14:48:42. This review is now closed.


--UTRSBot (talk) 14:48, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]