User talk:2600:4040:4005:500:415F:2294:8732:2728

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

June 2021[edit]

Please refrain from making non-constructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Screen Rant. This edit constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 01:44, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Screen Rant. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Hydrogenation (talk) 21:03, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Stop icon with clock
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for contravening Wikipedia's harassment policy.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Writ Keeper  21:12, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

Please unblock me, I just want to give the facts instead of this mainstream pseudoscience![edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

2600:4040:4005:500:415F:2294:8732:2728 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

You might think I'm just a troll but I'm not. This gender ideology is purely false and I want to tell why. So if you can let me speak and give you the facts, please do. This is very controversial and wikipedia is currently on a side even if you "try" to not be.2600:4040:4005:500:415F:2294:8732:2728 (talk) 21:15, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

No thanks. There are other sites where you can fight this battle. Yamla (talk) 21:21, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

In a word, no. Writ Keeper  21:19, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want proof then just see Dr Debra Soh debunk this pseudoscience.[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

2600:4040:4005:500:415F:2294:8732:2728 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

There is a page about her on the verge of being deleted just because it's the truth and YES, it's the truth. There is in fact not scientific evidence proving the existence of non binary or even gender being a "social construct". This is literally just a woke gender ideology you seem to be following(and so does wikipedia) You can continue to ignore me all you want but wikipedia is supposed to be an encyclopedia right? Pretty weird to call ellen page a man even though a woman is an adult human female which is what ellen page is because you can't change your sex and that is a fact both sides of this argument know(I hope) @Yamla @Writ Keeper.2600:4040:4005:500:415F:2294:8732:2728 (talk) 21:26, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you
    1. understand what you have been blocked for,
    2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 21:39, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock me, I will not disrupt or harass wikipedia.[edit]

Fine, I will not harass or add unrelated information to wikipedia pages without using the talk page and ask first if I can edit. This does not mean that people will like what I say based on their opinions as I just give the facts and people can prove me wrong instead of saying that it's irrelevant to the page. I'm sorry for the trouble and I will instead give the facts on the talk page instead of editing right away. 2600:4040:4005:500:415F:2294:8732:2728 (talk) 21:44, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

We aren't interested in you doing this. Other sites are more appropriate to what you are trying to accomplish. Wikipedia isn't one of them. --Yamla (talk) 21:46, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is supposed to give the facts as it's an encyclopedia. What other sites will accept the facts then? Tell me. It is currently biased. 2600:4040:4005:500:415F:2294:8732:2728 (talk) 17:49, June 14, 2021 (UTC)

Wikipedia does not give facts, Wikipedia summarizes what independent reliable sources state. No claims are made that the information here is the truth or factual, see WP:TRUTH. 331dot (talk) 22:32, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia also does not claim to be free of bias. Any bias in sources will be reflected in Wikipedia. The sources are presented to the reader so they can evaluate and judge them for themselves. 331dot (talk) 22:33, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

WIKIPEDIA IS NOT A TRUSTABLE SOURCE THEN F U AND YOUR FAKE DEFINITIONS!!! 2600:4040:4005:500:415F:2294:8732:2728 (talk) 10:46, June 15, 2021 (UTC)

I will not harass or disrupt wikipedia.[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

2600:4040:4005:500:415F:2294:8732:2728 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Fine, I will not harass or add unrelated information to wikipedia pages without using the talk page and ask first if I can edit. This does not mean that people will like what I say based on their opinions as I just give the facts and people can prove me wrong instead of saying that it's irrelevant to the page. I'm sorry for the trouble and I will instead give the facts on the talk page instead of editing right away. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and I just want to give the facts. 2600:4040:4005:500:415F:2294:8732:2728 (talk) 21:44, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Wikipedia is a collaborative environment where people of all different types and of different views work together. You may hold whatever views you wish to hold, but regardless of those views you must treat everyone here with respect and civility, and stick to summarizing independent reliable sources. You seem to be here to fight a war on that which does not conform to your views on gender, which is not what Wikipedia is for. As such, I see no benefit to Wikipedia in unblocking you, and as such I am declining your request. When the block ends, I suggest that you avoid topics on gender issues or you may be subject to longer blocks. 331dot (talk) 22:28, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I'm just telling the truth.[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

2600:4040:4005:500:415F:2294:8732:2728 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Look, I'm going to give factual information ok? "The end of gender" is a book written by neuroscientist Dr Debra Soh(there is literally a wiki page on here so go check that out if you don't believe me as it's not just "some" book). I know I have acted aggressively and pretty rude and I am SORRY for that. I promise that I will just give the reliable sources(in this case, excerpts from "the end of gender" and more of dr soh's research to pages related to gender and sex. That's all. I want to help wikipedia's pages on gender and sex using the research from dr debra soh. 2600:4040:4005:500:415F:2294:8732:2728 (talk) 00:34, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I'm sorry, but many of your edits were just simple, disruptive vandalism. I do not think you are capable of contributing in complex and nuanced topics, and you seem to be promising to jump right back into that. Kuru (talk) 11:20, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Talk:Demi Lovato[edit]

Having just come off a block for your persistent vandalism of articles to promote your WP:POV, this edit was extremely ill-advised. If you continue to use Wikipedia as a vehicle to push your point of view, you will be blocked from editing for ever-longer periods. Please stop. Laplorfill (talk) 15:15, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

seriously? Please take this as your final warning. Your persistent campaign of POV-pushing is extremely disruptive. Time to stop. Laplorfill (talk) 15:21, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dude, I'm just fixing the article to be more factual. Do you seriously not know what gender demi lovato is? She is a biological female. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:4040:4005:500:415F:2294:8732:2728 (talkcontribs)

WP:DISRUPT, WP:BATTLEGROUND[edit]

Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Expect your next block to be substantially longer. --Yamla (talk) 15:58, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock me, I will not disrupt or harass wikipedia.[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

2600:4040:4005:500:415F:2294:8732:2728 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Hi, so I was blocked for vandalism and harassment? I was just on the talk page to give errors in the article such as the fact that demi lovato is in fact a female but everyone seems to ignore that and just reports me. It's so unfair. User talk:Laplorfill should see this too.

2600:4040:4005:500:415F:2294:8732:2728 (talk) 17:37, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Enough is enough; you clearly have no intention of changing your behavior. Removing talk oage access. Writ Keeper  18:06, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Demi Lovato is a woman.[edit]

SHE IS A BIOLOGICAL WOMAN AND SHE JUST THINKS SHE IS NOT A MAN OR WOMAN BECAUSE SHE WAS ON DRUGS! WIKIPEDIA IS PURE WOKE NONSENSE AND IS THE WORST ONLINE ENCYCLOPEDIA!

I'm not sure this helps your case that if unblocked you will stop your campaign of harassment, disruption and vandalism. Laplorfill (talk) 17:47, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
It doesn't, I was talking to YOU. Knew you would come here. You seem to be a woke sjw. You probably can't even define the word woman because you say it's offensive(frikin wikipedia can).
What on earth are you talking about? You throw these words around like you think they are going to offend people. They don't. They just prove you are only here to push your own extremist agenda. I'm very sorry, but you don't get to do that on Wikipedia. Certainly not for the next two weeks at least. Laplorfill (talk) 17:52, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"extremist agenda" cute. Damn you guys really care about feelings than facts huh? Lol, are you seriously talking about offense snowflake? You here crying over idiots who think they are not a man or woman just because they say so? I know the facts and one I can certainly guarantee is that Demi Lovato is a woman. A woman is an adult human female. Demi Lovato is an adult human FEMALE. Demi Lovato is a woman so her pronouns are she/her. End of discussion.

June 2021[edit]

Stop icon with clock
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.  Writ Keeper  18:06, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.