User talk:2600:8801:2E00:1C62:8D9D:9D58:4C1B:F98A

September 2019[edit]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Talk:Chandrayaan-2, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Lupin VII (talk) 05:23, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Talk:Chandrayaan-2. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Lupin VII (talk) 05:25, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

What exactly is so-called "disruptive" about stating the indisputable FACT that India's Chandrayaan-2 moon mission is a complete FAILURE, stop censoring my discussion, everyone has a right to post on the talk page:

1.) https://www.nationalgeographic.com/science/2019/09/india-chandrayaan-2-landing-attempt-moon-lunar-south-pole/
2.) https://www.npr.org/2019/09/06/758419791/indias-attempt-to-land-rover-at-moon-s-south-pole-fails
3.) https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-49615665
4.) https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2019/09/06/chandrayaan-2-indias-second-moon-mission-may-have-failed-scientists/
5.) https://www.cnn.com/2019/09/06/india/india-moon-lunar-landing-chandrayaan-2-scn/index.html
6.) https://www.nytimes.com/2019/09/06/science/india-moon-landing-chandrayaan-2.html
7.) https://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/gadgets-and-tech/news/chandrayaan-2-india-lunar-landing-latest-missing-contact-lost-update-a9095361.html

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Talk:Chandrayaan-2, you may be blocked from editing. Lupin VII (talk) 05:35, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you not respond? Do you agree that all the reliable reference sources state that India's Chandrayaan-2 mission was a failure, can you not read the sources? Answer me! 2600:8801:2E00:1C62:8D9D:9D58:4C1B:F98A (talk) 05:37, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop editing my user talk page. I find that that discussion has outlived its usefulness. El_C 06:07, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Again, please stop editing my user talk page, you will not be warned again. El_C 06:11, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Why, we are having a discussion right now, don't you want to discuss issues with me? Everyone is entitled to speak, we don't live in communist totalitarian dicatorship surveillance states....just fess up and write the facts as they state on the reference sources, don't censor information! 2600:8801:2E00:1C62:8D9D:9D58:4C1B:F98A (talk) 06:13, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

That's right, I do not want to discuss issues with you. El_C 06:18, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Block[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

El_C 06:18, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.