User talk:2601:5CA:C302:43D0:7031:CDC9:2028:2669

May 2021[edit]

Hello, I'm Justiyaya. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Tomodachi Collection seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Justiyaya (talk) 15:25, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Reconstruction era. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Justiyaya (talk) 16:16, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at People of the Dominican Republic, you may be blocked from editing. Justiyaya (talk) 16:22, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Reconstruction era. — Jeff G. ツ 16:37, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dna Consultants is owned and operated by Donald "Panther" Yates, a rather notorious fraud and purveyor of pseudoscience. Citations to his publications or websites will not pass WP:FRINGE or WP:RS, do not use them. He iro 17:38, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Reconstruction era shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Egsan Bacon (talk) 18:07, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm merely updating the article. If I broke the 3 reverts article I feel as if Justiyaya did as well, adding his racist non-neutral attack as well. If I have to be banned, that's understandable but I find the bigoted approach to Wiki to be the cause of its decline.

However, I appreciate you responding here. I attempted to do the same with Justi but he bailed out. I was also contacted by an admin, but upon further talk and citation of sources (and explaining myself) he fully understood my position.

Why are you suppressing minority's history?

None of what you stated strikes at the Meat and Potatoes of my argument. You removed sources that have been cited by 3 seperate sources, one of them being one of the best governmental scientific bodies in the world. I'm not aware of this revert, but I am just responding to a Percieved Misjustice. That my people and their True History is being suppressed on wiki even when cited. Tell me, what do I need to do here? I'm more than open to a debate.

I conceded the DNA Consultants reference, and added three new ones. (There are many, many more.) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:5CA:C302:43D0:7031:CDC9:2028:2669 (talk) 18:12, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Genetic history of indigenous peoples of the Americas. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Netherzone (talk) 19:07, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

May 2021[edit]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Hemiauchenia (talk) 19:08, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 19:15, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.