User talk:2A00:23C4:201:5F00:48DE:423E:637:9334

September 2020

Hello, I'm Binksternet. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Anita White have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Binksternet (talk) 23:27, 16 September 2020 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Talk:Lady A. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Binksternet (talk) 23:28, 16 September 2020 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Anita White, you may be blocked from editing. Binksternet (talk) 23:30, 16 September 2020 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Anita White; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Binksternet (talk) 23:32, 16 September 2020 (UTC)

So, actually Binksternet does get to decide whether to remove that CSD template or not, though I wished they had explained why. Oh, I warned you that I would block you. Now I will. Drmies (talk) 23:39, 16 September 2020 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Anita White. (CC) Tbhotch^™ 23:39, 16 September 2020 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours to prevent further vandalism.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Drmies (talk) 23:39, 16 September 2020 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

• And while you were reverting me, which was foolish, you kept missing the whole point about speedy deletion: your tag claimed that the article didn't credibly state the importance of the subject. That is silly. If American Songwriter calls her "a legendary soul & blues diva", then, well, you don't have a case. Drmies (talk) 23:41, 16 September 2020 (UTC)

---