User talk:2A02:C7F:1480:FE00:8D9B:2FAB:58D7:DD47

Bengal cat

Hello Regarding the "Bengal Cat" page and the second revert. on the talk page for the administrator Athaenara... Athaenara admitted that she had over-reacted when she reverted the entire page and erased the edits.

In my defense I originally thought that my extensive edits were reverted by a vandal (vandalism) I did not know that Athaenara was an administrator and so I thought the site had been vandalized. Athaenara and I traded a few messages on this topic and she was not of the opinion that the edits I have done should be reverted. Please see the work that I have done and undue the drastic revert. I invested so much time editing the page with extensive edits because it was so poorly referenced. It was a great deal of time and energy hunting down referenced and Breed standards to fix the page. Please see my work in the community to know that I am helping in the community. I can fix any issues that you find in the work. Thank you for your consideration

(Lubbad85 (talk) 03:29, 27 January 2019 (UTC)).

• To the anonymous unregistered 2A02:C7F:1480:FE00:8D9B:2FAB:58D7:DD47 editor and to User:Lubbad85: if you have anything to contribute to the Wikipedia:Copyright problems/2019 January 27 discussion, please participate in it. – Athaenara ✉ 03:42, 27 January 2019 (UTC)

@Athaenara Apart from the obvious copyright issues that have been outlined which I am in complete agreement with, Valid and Factual sources were removed by Lubbad85 with reasons such as' information being sourced by Bengal breeders' and 'Personal Blogs' only for the same editor (Lubbad85) to add information given by Bengal breeders on a personal blog ( https://cats.lovetoknow.com/cat-expert-interviews/japanese-bobtail-cat-breeder-interview which was written by the Bengal breeder (http://belrouge.com/)

Another example being sources such as https://www.petmd.com/cat/breeds/c_ct_bengal which has been near copied over from.

The Bengal Cat wiki page had credible links and information which have now been removed and sources added that are clearly similar and copy pasted from websites that are guilty of being the same 'type' of websites that the editor gave the reason for the original sources removal. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2a02:c7f:1480:fe00:8d9b:2fab:58d7:dd47 (talk) 04:08, 27 January 2019 (UTC)

To 2a02:c7f:1480:fe00:8d9b:2fab:58d7:dd47: It would be extremely helpful if you would post your analysis on Wikipedia:Copyright problems/2019 January 27. – Athaenara ✉ 04:15, 27 January 2019 (UTC)

---