User talk:49TL/Archive/November 2005

This is a talk page archive for Xy7. Please do not edit this page. To leave a message, please see the current talk page. No further edits should be made to this page.

Major General H.H.Tudor[edit]

Is there any chance of contacting the guy who wrote the article on Major General H.H.Tudor to try and get in contact with geraldryan777.

Talk[edit]

Hey,

I don't seem interested. I would like to talk to you if ur avalible.

C1 shawn 19:23, 1 November 2005 (UTC)shawn[reply]

Your RfA[edit]

Ironically, I happened to be looking at your RfA when you pinged me. I'm sorry my vote was lost in the move, I don't know why that was, but it seems you'll do quite well. Congratulations, and I look forward to seeing quality admin work from you. Ëvilphoenix ^Burn! 21:38, 1 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

RFA for Johntex[edit]

Hello, I want to thank you for your support of my RfA. I hope to see you around Wikipedia. Best, Johntex\^talk 00:16, 2 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

RFA Rlated[edit]

I would of nominated you. but I missed out. You are doing so well. I think you have almost broken the record for most support. I dont think you will have trouble after a bit of time as an admin becoming a beuractrat. --☺Adam1213☺ Talk +|WWW 08:46, 2 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Who says he wants to be a bureaucrat? — JIP | Talk 14:20, 7 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

PRueda29 RFA[edit]

Thanks for you support! I really appreciate it. PRueda29 17:58, 4 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

194.80.21.10[edit]

Hi, I see you're one of the increasingly large number of users keeping a close eye on the above IP and it's constant vandalism by what I suspect is only a small group of kids. The warnings don't seem to be doing anything, as they wouldn't to kids! Two things occur to me:

1) The 1,200 pupils couldn't be editing at the same time. The school will probably have only a few computers (say 100 or so) to which the children won't have access all the time. A minor point I know!

2) What would be the objections by other Wikipedians to a total ban on the IP address, do you think? Setting up an account on Wikipedia takes only a moment and any legitimate editors (I notice there are a few at this address) could set up their own account with ease. I'm sure teachers, non-idiotic pupils and the like would understand. Coyote-37 22:11, 4 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

user with same nick almost[edit]

There is user with the same username almost: User:Firefox --Adam1213 Talk + 16:57, 5 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

firefox you rfa has done so so so well... I hope that some time I can get one through. Maybe you should put on your user page the other user and get them to put you... --Adam1213 Talk + 18:04, 5 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

yes. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Adam1213 (talk • contribs)

RfA thanks[edit]

Thank-you for expressing your confidence in me at my recent Request for Adminship. The final result was 40/0/0, and my "superpowers" have now been activated. I look forward to helping out with the development of the encyclopedia. Physchim62 (talk · contribs)

Johann Wolfgang's RfA[edit]

Thank you for your support on my RfA. I will use my new abilities with the common interest in mind. If you have any questions please feel free to contact me.

Johann Wolfgang [ T ...C ] 03:04, 7 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks from Pamri[edit]

Hi, Thanks a ton for voting at my RFA. I am now a wikipedia administrator and I hope I can keep your trust. Thanks again. --Pamri ^{• Talk • Reply} 03:55, 7 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations![edit]

Yes, I know I'm jumping the gun a bit, but voting time is up, and I don't think there's any doubt regarding the outcome of your RfA. Hope to see you on RC Patrol tonight with your new admin tools! Owen× ☎ 18:33, 7 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I have promoted you to adminship. Congradulations. Please familiarize yourself with the relavant policies when exercising your admin powers. →Raul654 07:11, 8 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Congrats, I'm sure you'll make a good admin! ALKIVAR™

07:13, 8 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations. May your vandal slaying skills never abandon you. ≈ jossi fresco ≈ t • @ 07:23, 8 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Don't forget to dd your name to WP:LA. ≈ jossi fresco ≈ t • @ 07:25, 8 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations, and you're very welcome! --Merovingian (t) (c) (e) 18:33, 8 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Congrats Firefox, pity you didnt get a hundred eh? Good luck, we all have great confidence in you! Cheers Ban e s 18:48, 8 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah - go FireFox! Go FireFox! No need for you to have doubts after all, eh? --Cel e stianpower ^háblame 18:43, 8 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

More congratualtions! Use your new superpowers for the good of humanity! :)--Sean|Bla ck 20:05, 8 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

My RFA[edit]

Thank you very much for supporting my rather contentious request for adminship, but now that I've been promoted, I'd like to do a little dance here *DANCES*. If you have any specific issues/problems with me, please feel free to state them on my talk page so that I can work to prevent them in the future, and thanks once again! ALKIVAR™ 07:46, 8 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Congradulations on becoming an admin[edit]

I added you to User:Zzyzx11/RFA_nomination_records your RFA was the 5th most supported RFA ever!!! --Adam1213 Talk + 09:15, 8 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for supporting my RfA[edit]

I know I've been slow in saying this, but thanks for supporting my request for adminship. It was an honor to be both nominated and approved as an admin. If there is ever any adminish (is that a word :-) things you need help with, please let me know. --Alabamaboy 16:17, 8 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations![edit]

Congrats on the RfA! Just dropped in to check messages and saw the good news. I am sure that you will make and excellent admin. If I can get my Internet issues workded out maybe I can congratulate you "in person" on IRC tonight. (It is now 2pm for me.) Got to go. Catch you later. -- Psy guy ^(talk) 18:58, 8 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Congrats on your adminship. :) Jacqui ^★ 19:01, 8 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations from the blowing snow country. CambridgeBayWeather (talk) 19:10, 8 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Congrats! -- Rune Welsh | ταλκ | Esperanza 19:13, 8 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations!! Regards, Carioca 20:55, 8 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Congrats from me too. Impressive final count! - Mgm|^(talk) 21:01, 8 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

More congrats! I've counted about 25 times in the past 10 days alone when my attempt at an RVV has come to nothing because you've got there in milliseconds... wait: that means I've voted to make you even quicker! Damn! I object! ;o) ➨ ❝REDVERS❞ 21:32, 8 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations! Jayjg ^(talk) 21:37, 8 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Congrats on becoming an Admin. I reiterate, I really thought you were one. Good job. I give you this Reversion barnstar to commemorate your promotion! Oran e (t) (c) (@) 22:09, 8 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Congrats! Just barely squeaked by, I see! - CHAIRBOY (☎) 22:38, 8 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Congrats from me too. --a.n.o.n.y.m ^t 23:45, 8 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

First of all, thank you for your support of my own RfA, which also (barely) passed!! And congrats to you as well, highly deserved! Ramallite ^(talk) 04:02, 9 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

You shattered my record. :( Haha, congrats! Thanks for your vote on mine, as well. Ac e tic '^Acid 07:12, 9 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Congrats, and all the best. --Bhadani 13:04, 10 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations on your landslide consensus : ) --MPerel ^{( talk | contrib)} 15:15, 10 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

My RfA[edit]

Greetings, my fellow new admin. Thanks for voting to support me on my recent RfA! — Phil Welch 22:14, 8 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

You're Welcome[edit]

I'm very selective about whom I vote for, therefore I rarely vote. However, when I spot a Wikipedian whom I believe is devoted and dedicated to the project plus, has the potential of becoming a great Admin. then I'm there to give him or her my full support. If I can ever be of any help, please do not hesitate to get in touch with me. Tony the Marine 02:29, 8 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you[edit]

Very much for your kind support of my adminship. I'll do my best to live up to your and my other supporters' expectations. If you have any comments or concerns on my actions as an administrator, please let me know. Thank you! — MC MasterChef :: Leave a tip — 14:42, 9 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I'm contesting your deletion of Cincinnati Media[edit]

I am a journalist trying to create a comprehensive guide to Cincinnati media. This is not promotional material for my organization! I am attempting to create something to allow more open local access to media and to help people contact their local media.

Please email me to discuss.

steve@goxray.com

Steve Novotni

SUPER SPEED![edit]

Man, I tried to revert your userpage before you got there, but you beat me to the punch! :( I was also going to edit that vandal meter except I have no idea where the number is to change. Mo0[talk] 19:56, 9 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

You're Welcome and Welcome[edit]

What a neat Thank You Template! T'was a slam-dunk, Congrads and welcome to the Cabal!--R.D.H. (Ghost In The Machine) 02:46, 11 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks[edit]

Thanks for reverting my user page, and for blocking that IP. All I did was vote on one AfD and I've been vandalized more than the whole time I've been here. Anyway, thanks again. Chick Bowen 03:16, 11 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Kyle Weiss deleted.[edit]

Hello FireFox.

Glad to meet your accquaintence.

Yesterday I had submitted an article on myself, and noticed it was deleted saying it was an attack page.

I'm admittedly completely ignorant towards how exactly Wiki works, though I used it as a base for general knowledge and common opinion almost on a daily basis. There was a defenition of "blame" that I'm currently posting at work, which lends itself towards failure of management in the workplace. Simply brilliant.

So, the next question is, can that article on myself be restored? I worded it just right and was quite proud of it's poise. Is there a way to verify this isn't an inflamitory statement and is actually being made by the author himself?

I'd greatly like to know for all accounts.

Please, if you wish, I'll check back here, but I can be reached at:

...since you appear to be a moderator/administrator of some kind.

Thanks for your time.

Kyle Weiss

Vandalism by 216.185.69.65[edit]

Hi, FireFox. Saw your "this is your last warning" warning to 216.185.69.65. Well, they just hit Cameroon again (see this edit). Just bringing it to your attention so you can deal with how you think fit. Thanks, —BrianSmithson 19:47, 11 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

User:141.150.142.127[edit]

This user is indeed a returning vandal; he's been attacking my user page, talk page, and other articles for months now. His IPs may have changed, but it's still the same person from the same ISP. Nufy8 21:41, 11 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

It's no problem. Thanks for restoring the block time. Nufy8 21:49, 11 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Rajput[edit]

I would like to draw your attention to rajput page.

I have created the document from a list of 61 books which are mentioned in the references section. Authors have done extensive research in the field of history and then published these books. Muslims and some users like zora/gothean are accusing me of hindutva POV/anti muslim and I have repeatedly asked these muslims and self proclaimed moderators,on the talk page, to point out historically incorrect statements in the article. No one has come forth. Yet they revert my edits. When I ask them for citations they remain quiet.

Also it seems providing references is meaningless here. What seems to be working is how many people one has on there side. i.e what matters on wikipedia is outshouting the other.

Now they are accusing me of impersonating others.

Can you keep an eye out on the rajput page and help prevent the vandalism of Zora/Taaoo/Wisesabre/Supersaiyan?

Shivraj Singh 04:25, 12 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Psy guy's RfA[edit]

Thanks for supporting my RfA. It recently closed with final tally of 51/1/2. I sincerely appreciate it and I hope I can live up to your expectations. I will try my best to be a good administrator. If you ever need anything, just let me know. Thanks! -- Psy guy ^(talk) 05:43, 12 November 2005 (UTC) [reply]

Merci beaucoup[edit]

Hey, Firefox! Thanks for your vote of support on my nomination to become an administrator. I passed, and my floor rag has since been bestowed upon me. Please let me know if you need me to help with anything in particular! —BrianSmithson 16:09, 12 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

shivraj[edit]

Shivraj Singh is not letting me remove these comments

I find the claim by mohammedans that Shivraj is using multiple pseudonyms to strengthen his postion totally distasteful. But it also shows that these mohammedans are now at their wits end. They do not have any logical arguments left so they are down to levelling level foul charges. Shame on all these pakis!!! Keep the flag flying Shiv. Sisodia

from the article Rajput's talk page. what do you have to say about that? الثاقب (WiseSabre| talk) 19:17, 12 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

FYI, I removed several vandalistic (and sometimes more racist) attacks by "Sisodia" on the Rajput and Urdu talk pages, and blocked his anonymous IP for 24 hrs, but I left this comment and another because they weren't vandalism. Sisodia, for his part, says that he's only "defending" himself against people who have edited his writing. kwami 20:22, 12 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you![edit]

Thanks for helping with my sig! JoanneB 20:07, 12 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

How do I get the word out on a wikipedia related injustice?[edit]

Since my high school, Cinco Ranch High School, blocked Wikipedia ive been on a mission to open it back up. Got any suggestions?

Jtkiefer's RFB[edit]

49TL/Archive/November 2005

Thanks for your support on my request for bureaucratship.

The final outcome was (17/17/4) meaning that it failed, if you have any advice on how I can be a better editor or administrator please don't hesitate to leave a message on my talk page. Thanks again for your support. Jtkiefer ^{T | @ | C} ----- 20:26, 13 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Your sig is leaking[edit]

Please correct it! - Ta bu shi da yu 22:39, 14 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Heh... appears a few people have sent a messgae... hope you don't think I was on the attack! - Ta bu shi da yu 13:33, 15 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

your signature[edit]

I would suggest fixing your signature by adding three  because those font tags have not been closed... It's coloring things other than your signature blue... -- WB 00:15, 15 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

More specifically you should change it like this, in order to avoid a number problems. Thanks. Canderson7 02:47, 15 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Fix your damn signature, heheheh look at bottom of Wikipedia talk:Administrator intervention against vandalism (actually go and fix that too) -- ( drini's _vandalproof page ☎ ) 03:15, 15 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Also, whn you put two FONT tags, one after other, you need to close BOTH (re: your talk page layout) -- ( drini's _vandalproof page ☎ ) 03:15, 15 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed. -- WB 04:21, 15 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

closing AFD discussions[edit]

Good evening, FireFox. I noticed that you closed a recent AFD discussion. In the future, when you close the discussion, please always use subst: in front of the {{vt}} and {{vb}} commands. Subst: makes some of the important warnings and instructions for future readers visible. Thanks. Rossami [[User talk:Rossami|(talk)]] 01:34, 15 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Your sig[edit]

Yep,fix it please.It makes pags small and blue.Thanks.--Tan Ding Xiang 陈鼎翔 03:46, 15 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The signature problem seems to have something to do with recent changes in wp's software. You can either use  or remove (for the time being) the colours, if you haven't already done so. Take care!

ps if you find out what was the reason for that (apart from signatures it affected div and I don't know what else) leave me a message (I'm really curious about this one) +MATIA ☎ 12:37, 15 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I think it's just the problem with the . Did you change anything to your signature recently Firefox? Anyway, it's good that new MediaWiki is "forcing" people to close their open tags. (If MW is doing that). -- WB 15:23, 15 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

No, I haven't changed it for at least a week or two and I've had no problems. It seems as if many people are having the same problem. I have changed my sig now, it seems to be "compatible"... let's just see what happens :) FireFox ™ 17:20, 15 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Strange indeed. But it's a good practice to close the tags anyway. You might try the Bugzilla if you're really wondering about this problem. -- WB 18:10, 15 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The problems were caused when the devs were forced to disable HTML Tidy. HTML Tidy had previously been causing a good deal of invalid HTML to display correctly. While it was down this invalid HTML caused all sorts of problems. More info can be found on WP:AN. Canderson7 21:23, 15 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Here, I'll try an easy fix up method. I suggest you put the "Code" below as your signature in the "my preferences" option, which will result in:

Code	`[[User:FireFox\|<span style="color:black;">Fir</span>]][[WP:ESP\|<span style="color:green;">e</span>]][[User:FireFox\|<span style="color:red;">Fo</span>]][[User talk:FireFox\|<span style="color:blue;">x</span>]] <sup><small>[[WP:CVU\|<span style="color:purple;">-CVU-</span>]]</small></sup>`
Output	Fir e Fo x ^-CVU-

Yeah. -- WB 00:49, 16 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks[edit]

Thanks for supporting me for adminship. The RfA passed today. I look forward to working with you to make Wikipedia a better place. --Nlu 04:18, 19 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

A message[edit]

Good afternoon! --bbatsell | « give me a ring » 15:35, 20 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you![edit]

Hi FireFox,

Thank you very much for your support on my RfA. I was both surprised and delighted about the amount of support votes and all the kind words! If I can ever help with anything or if you have any comments about my actions as an admin, please let me know! Regards, Joann e B 14:03, 21 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

GraemeL's RFA[edit]

Hi FireFox,

I am now an administrator and would like to thank you for your support on my RfA. I was very surprised at the number of votes and amount of and kind comments that I gathered. Please don't hesitate to contact me if I mess up in the use of my new powers. --GraemeL ^(talk) 14:34, 21 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

MONGO RfA[edit]

I really appreciate your support on my RfA. I have your barnstar you gave me on my userpage BTW. I'll do all I can to ensure that you know that you made the right choice by supporting me. Thanks again!--MONGO 04:44, 23 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Case assigned for MentCom[edit]

You've been assigned. Now show up in #wikipedia-probation. R e dwolf24 (talk) Attention Washingtonians! 01:17, 24 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

vandal[edit]

204.209.247.2 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) vandalized March 23 twice in 30 minute spans. FOr some reason given two test4s for it, which is lenient. I think we should block Borisblue 17:16, 25 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks[edit]

Thanks for reverting vandalism on my user page. --Nlu 00:38, 27 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for pointing out that I am a vandal[edit]

I was just highlighting how rubbish this place has got. I feel quite sorry for you people who try to plug every hole, it must be very boring, and the information you are protecting is usually incorrect and always biased. If you really enjoy doing this, why don't you go and write a proper encyclopedia? If you just like reverting vandalism, why don't you become a policeman? Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz.

LOL!!! 194.80.20.10 13:59, 28 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Blocking of User talk:165.161.3.13[edit]

He/she/it did it again ... :-( --> List of dance style categories --Roland2 21:50, 28 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks[edit]

Thx for reverting the vandalism on my userpage. Cheers. Lectonar 08:07, 29 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Userpage Vandalism[edit]

Hi Firefox,

Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my userpage...I didn't know that it had become sort of a target while I was away! =P

- Cheers, Mailer Diablo 18:50, 29 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Another BC school to block[edit]

142.22.16.56 - same pattern as the previous one. -EDM 19:50, 29 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Something else for you to fix (hehe)[edit]

I presume it is your bot running in #wikpedia-en-vandalism (19:53, 29 November 2005 (UTC)) - There is a fault with the "userparse" thing or whatever it is called. For example: [[Special:Log/newusers]]: Warning! "[[User:Dothackangel]]" has a nick containing the flag word: "hack" Block: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Blockip&ip= As you can see the link doesn't go to the right destination. Thanks, --Fir e Fox 19:53, 29 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Oh? You sure you coopied it correctly? Is the problem http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Blockip&ip= beeing cut short? --Cool Cat^Talk|@ 19:58, 29 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Yes that is the problem, no direct link to the user's block page. --Fir e Fox 20:06, 29 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Please fix it. Fire Fox 20:17, 1 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I can only do that in the weekends. I have no access to the computer to make adjustments. :( --Cool Cat^Talk|@ 20:36, 1 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Royal vandal taunting?[edit]

Hmm, seems like they like you... :P --Cool Cat^Talk|@ 20:07, 29 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

lol [1] --Fir e Fox 20:11, 29 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Dance: User talk:216.11.6.193[edit]

For your collection: [2] ... --Roland2 18:22, 30 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The above is a talk page archive for Xy7. Please do not edit this page. To leave a message, please see the current talk page. No further edits should be made to this page.