User talk:50.203.99.102

Welcome!

Interested in becoming a regular contributor to Wikipedia? Create an account!

This IP address, 50.203.99.102, is registered to Comcast Business and may be shared by many users of an enterprise network, so you might receive messages on this page that were not intended for you.

To have your own user pages, keep track of articles you've edited in a watchlist, and have access to a few other special features, please consider registering an account! It's fast and free.

If you are autoblocked repeatedly, contact your Internet service provider or network administrator and request it contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on its proxy servers so that blocks will affect only the intended user. Administrators: review contributions carefully if blocking this IP address or reverting its contributions. If a block is needed, consider a soft block using Template:Anonblock. In response to vandalism from this IP address, abuse reports may be sent to its network administrator for investigation.

Network administrators monitoring this IP address for vandalism can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

August 2015[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Kelly has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Kelly was changed by 50.203.99.102 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.910053 on 2015-08-28T20:24:00+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 20:24, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

April 2016[edit]

Hello, I'm I dream of horses. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Prohibition of drugs— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message (talk to me) (My edits) @ 04:17, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

September 2017[edit]

Hello, I'm Adam9007. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Brown tree snake, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Adam9007 (talk) 23:07, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to Brown tree snake. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. — nihlus kryik (talk) 07:51, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did with this edit to Brown tree snake. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. — nihlus kryik (talk) 07:57, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Brown tree snake. — nihlus kryik (talk) 07:59, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 09:46, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 01:05, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

October 2017[edit]

Hello, I'm CLCStudent. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Extinct in the wild have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. CLCStudent (talk) 00:17, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Being Ian. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Jim1138 (talk) 04:48, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to The Three Bears (Looney Tunes), you may be blocked from editing. Jim1138 (talk) 05:02, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Brown tree snake. Jim1138 (talk) 06:14, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 09:53, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

November 2017[edit]

Hello, I'm Boomer Vial. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Montserrat oriole, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you.

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Hawaiian crow, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Pancakes654 15:25, 26 November 2017 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pancakes654 (talk • contribs)

December 2017[edit]

Hello, I'm CLCStudent. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Yellow crazy ant have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. CLCStudent (talk) 17:34, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Wyoming toad. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Clubjustin ^Talkosphere 05:33, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

February 2018[edit]

Hello, I'm Oshwah. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Coluber constrictor, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 04:29, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to McDonaldland. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 23:23, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

April 2018[edit]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Scimitar oryx. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Loopy30 (talk) 19:35, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Not evaluated article[edit]

Hi, please stop adding additional species examples to the Not evaluated article page. There's more than enough already, but if you really feel it needs more, then discuss on the article talk page to gain consensus first before adding it back. In the mean time, these edits will continue to be reverted. Loopy30 (talk) 17:01, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

July 2018[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Not evaluated, you may be blocked from editing. You continue to ignore helpful messages both here and in edit summaries. If you continue to add additional examples to IUCN rating category pages when they are not needed, the edits will just be reverted until you first engage in a discussion of why you think they are needed. Loopy30 (talk) 14:57, 13 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Burmese python, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Yeenosaurus (talk) 🍁 06:50, 14 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Unsourced edits at Extinct in the wild[edit]

Apparently you have not taken aboard anything at all from the previous warnings. Do not add unsourced material to articles. What kind of twisted reasoning could you possibily employ to justify adding guesses about IUCn status changes, while adding "by whom" tags yourself? This is either rampant lack of competence or trolling. Your rope is getting very short. The next instance of this kind of disruptive edits will get you reported and probably blocked. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 07:21, 16 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

July 2018[edit]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Retail apocalypse. SummerPhD^v2.0 12:25, 16 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion[edit]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Loopy30 (talk) 13:01, 20 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring at Not evaluated[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 months for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

An edit warring report can be seen at the noticeboard. I've decided to do a longer block since you've been blocked for long periods of time in the past, especially for unsourced changes, and you never seem to communicate on talk pages. EdJohnston (talk) 22:21, 20 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

October 2018[edit]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Freeman High School (Washington). This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. John from Idegon (talk) 22:19, 28 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Not evaluated[edit]

Could you please stop trying to add a list of examples to the page? You have now been reverted by four different editors, all of whom agree that this is not required for an open catch-all category that by definition contains every species not in one of the other classifications. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 07:30, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 6 months for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Continued unsourced changes, after the block of 20 July 2018. EdJohnston (talk) 19:17, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

September 2019[edit]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Not evaluated. Loopy30 (talk) 11:22, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for 1 year[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 year for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 01:16, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

January 2020[edit]

why did you remove the paragraph on McCleary v. Washington. soruces seemed to back up oct 5th version BanditKilo (talk) 19:28, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

July 2021[edit]

Hello, I'm GoingBatty. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Paap-O-Meter have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. GoingBatty (talk) 16:04, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.