User talk:5 albert square/Archive2

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The Signpost: 30 September 2015

Please comment on Help talk:Citation Style 1

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Help talk:Citation Style 1. Legobot (talk) 00:04, 4 October 2015 (UTC)

18:33, 5 October 2015 (UTC)

TDA

I read TDA's talk page and also followed your invitation to reflect on his recent edits and I don't know what the problem is. He voices his opinion about what's going on in WP and WPO, but he doesn't out anyone or call anyone names. Giano, among others, also used to do the same thing whenever he was blocked and no one ever shut off his talk page access. It looks like you're just trying to silence this editor's opinions even though he's not violating any policies. Cla68 (talk) 00:13, 6 October 2015 (UTC)

And by the way, inviting someone to "reflect on their recent edits" is incredibly patronizing and condescending. I know it's part of WP culture for WP admins to talk to non-admin editors that way, especially editors who have just been blocked, but it's likely one of the reasons why WP's editor base is so rapidly declining. Would you say that to TDA or anyone else if he/she was standing face-to-face, looking you in the eye? I seriously doubt it, because I wouldn't tell you something like that to your face, even if we had a work-related supervisor/subordinate relationship. I would only talk that way to one of my children, and only before they turn 15 years old. I don't know why you all think you can treat people like that, except you're blinded by the anonymity of the internet and brings out the worst in you. Cla68 (talk) 00:17, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
I also saw this and my reaction was the opposite. User talk pages are not soapboxes or forums. I'm usually willing to allow some leeway for blocked editors to discuss things not related to their block, but the whole point of a block is to prevent the blocked editor from editing. Bypassing that by posting on your own talk page and pinging people in order to express your opinions defeats the point of the block. Besides, the whole "Message to SLOWP observers" thread is yet another violation of his Gamergate topic ban—the topic ban for which he was originally blocked for violating. For the third time. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 00:30, 6 October 2015 (UTC)

(edit conflict) (talk page stalker) Blocked users should only be editing their talk pages to appeal or request clarification of their block, anyone persistently using their talk page for other purposes should and in most cases will have their ability to edit it removed. TDA was not attempting to appeal or clarify his block, and was attempting to participate in Wikipedia by proxy and so 5AS' action was correct. I do not believe that the phrasing was intended to be patronising (it would be rather out of character for one thing), and while it could be seen as impolite I do not see it as a major issue. Thryduulf (talk) 00:34, 6 October 2015 (UTC)

Hi Cla68 sorry but talk pages are not forums or soapboxes and when you are blocked they should only be used to discuss possible unblocking. The way TDA was using his talk page was to get a way of editing Wikipedia whilst blocked. So, I treated them the way I would any other person who evades their block which is to increase the original block and to revoke talk page access as that was being abused. Sorry if I came across as patronising, I can assure you that was not meant.--5 albert square (talk) 00:42, 6 October 2015 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Teamwork Barnstar
Great job! Lonjing (talk) 10:56, 6 October 2015 (UTC)

Request

Hello, 5 albert square. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship. Legobot (talk) 00:03, 8 October 2015 (UTC)

Hi

Hello, 5 albert square. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

The Signpost: 07 October 2015

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Lead section. Legobot (talk) 00:05, 12 October 2015 (UTC)

16:29, 12 October 2015 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia:2015 administrator election reform/Phase I/RfC. Legobot (talk) 00:05, 16 October 2015 (UTC)

LO

There were more. There are always more. Done for the nonce.--Bbb23 (talk) 20:28, 17 October 2015 (UTC)

LOL! Why am I not surprised at there being more? Thank you for doing that @Bbb23:. You really would think that they'd find something better to do with their time.............--5 albert square (talk) 20:34, 17 October 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 14 October 2015

16:02, 19 October 2015 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia:Village pump (policy). Legobot (talk) 00:05, 20 October 2015 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. Legobot (talk) 00:05, 25 October 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 21 October 2015

Please edit descriptions

You should be editing descriptions when using Dabfix. If you don't want to: click "remove auto-descriptions" and it'll remove the unedited description. The tool only gathers all information onto a single page to help you edit faster. — Dispenser 00:25, 26 October 2015 (UTC)

OK, thanks--5 albert square (talk) 01:54, 26 October 2015 (UTC)

October 2015 GOCE newsletter

Guild of Copy Editors October 2015 Newsletter

September drive: Thanks to everyone who participated in last month's backlog-reduction drive. Of the 25 editors who signed up, 18 copyedited at least one article. Final results, including barnstars awarded, are available here.

October blitz: The one-week October blitz, targeting requests, has just concluded. Of the nine editors who signed up, seven copyedited at least one request; check your talk page for your barnstar!

The month-long November drive, focusing on our oldest backlog articles (June, July, and August 2014) and the October requests, is just around the corner. Hope to see you there!

Thanks again for your support; together, we can improve the encyclopedia! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators Jonesey95, Baffle gab1978, KieranTribe, Miniapolis and Pax85.

To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:54, 26 October 2015 (UTC)

18:04, 26 October 2015 (UTC)

58.172.60.181

Can you look to this Edit i think it seems grossly offensive to me. To be honest i know you're into EastEnders but i want to be Revision deleted from the public view because it not suitable for public view. Would you do that for me please. --Angry Bald English Villian Man (talk) 09:04, 27 October 2015 (UTC)

hello I will have a look at this later in work at the minute 149.254.234.38 (talk) 15:14, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi, I have now looked at it and I don't believe that this is worth rev del. I've googled what they've put and it's song lyrics. Given how readily available they are it is probably not worth rev del.--5 albert square (talk) 20:31, 27 October 2015 (UTC)

Use of RevDel on User talk:John lilburne

What "other valid reason" did you have for these uses of revision deletion on John lilburne's user talk page? Because, having looked at the revisions you hid, I cannot see any valid reason whatsoever.  — Scott talk 23:34, 27 October 2015 (UTC)

Hi, I'm afraid I don't remember. After all it was nearly 10 months ago. If you think I was wrong feel free to undo it.--5 albert square (talk) 23:42, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
Many thanks for the swift reply. I've restored visibility.  — Scott talk 23:56, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
No problems, thanks :)--5 albert square (talk) 00:00, 28 October 2015 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia:Requests for comment/5 millionth article logo. Legobot (talk) 00:06, 29 October 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 28 October 2015

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia:Vandalism/RfC for a trial unbundling of blocking. Legobot (talk) 00:05, 2 November 2015 (UTC)

16:43, 2 November 2015 (UTC)