User talk:5 albert square/Archive3

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Orphaned non-free image File:Martin Fowler 4.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Martin Fowler 4.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 00:20, 5 November 2015 (UTC)

Ignore this, the image is back in the article. - JuneGloom07 Talk 03:00, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
The image was never removed, but the description page of this and the other image in the article both say it's not in use. This is really strange. I've left a message on Sfan00 IMG's talk page. –anemoneprojectors– 08:08, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
Agreed, it's in use... Quite why it's saying it's not is beyond me. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:30, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
I actually logged in because that page gets targeted by a sock who has a habit of removing the image and I thought that's what happened here. I'm still thinking that may have triggered it and maybe it wasn't corrected when it was reverted? 5 albert square (talk) 03:21, 6 November 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Main Page

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Main Page. Legobot (talk) 00:05, 7 November 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 04 November 2015

17:19, 9 November 2015 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia:Security review RfC. Legobot (talk) 00:06, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 11 November 2015

19:39, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia:Non-administrator Arbitrators RfC. Legobot (talk) 00:05, 17 November 2015 (UTC)

Further revdel please?

Hello, and thanks for hiding a revision at User talk:ClueBot Commons. I wavered over whether to bother someone with a revdel request, in the end decided to just not draw attention to it, but I appreciate your looking at it. In order to hide the offending comment completely, please would you also consider hiding the subsequent revision by SineBot? Thanks. Wdchk (talk) 16:26, 17 November 2015 (UTC)

Thanks. I must have missed that, currently on holiday so editing from a mobile device! It was also 1am here at the time, I guess that's what happens when I edit that late lol! 5 albert square (talk) 23:59, 17 November 2015 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Community portal. Legobot (talk) 00:04, 21 November 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 18 November 2015

20:26, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:52, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Special:Preferences. Legobot (talk) 00:06, 25 November 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 25 November 2015

16:16, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. Legobot (talk) 00:08, 3 December 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 02 December 2015

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Did you know

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Did you know. Legobot (talk) 00:10, 7 December 2015 (UTC)

New socks NickiMinaj4life and 86.133.178.209 are obviously the same editing any pop song pages as previous sock Y45ed. (I think he/she is not doing any rock band album or song pages, as well as the Beatles.) 123.136.106.74 (talk) 00:36, 7 December 2015 (UTC)

Hello,
Given the sheer volume of socks created recently, I would strongly suggest that you raise this as a sockpuppet investigation. They will be able to confirm if these accounts are related and if there are any other sleeping accounts. I am pinging in @Callanecc: to this conversation as they are the most recent CheckUser to deal with this editor. --5 albert square (talk) 00:49, 7 December 2015 (UTC)

Username Liability

Hi there!

I see you are an active user on Wikipedia and I wondered: Is my username a familiarity with any persons?

Please get back to me as I am worried about myself as a user and editor.

Many thanks. ShannonBrightCole (talk) 00:54, 7 December 2015 (UTC)

Hi @ShannonBrightCole:,
Welcome to Wikipedia!
We would always suggest exercising caution when creating an account in your real name, this is because it increases the potential for harassment especially if you edit in controversial areas. Even if you change your username, a record of your previous username remains permanently.
We would also suggest that you do not edit under a name that is likely to imply that you are (or are related to) a specific, identifiable person, unless it is your real name. If you have the same name as a well-known person to whom you are unrelated, and are using your real name, you should state clearly on your userpage that you are unrelated to the well-known person.
I would suggest that you read WP:REALNAME as that offers further guidance. I hope this helps you.--5 albert square (talk) 01:06, 7 December 2015 (UTC)


Hi @5 albert square:,

Thanks for your help! I am soon going read through the terms and conditions of my username on Wikipedia very soon!

Before reading, I would like to ask a quick question: Is it a problem that I did not insert spaces in my username? I am using my real name but I was anxious that my user may be reported as I did not hyphen my double-barrelled surname. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ShannonBrightCole (talkcontribs)

Hi @ShannonBrightCole:,
I am not aware that would cause any issues for User:DeltaQuadBot. You will find that bot reports any username issues to WP:UAA. I hope this helps you.--5 albert square (talk) 01:26, 7 December 2015 (UTC)

17:53, 7 December 2015 (UTC)