User talk:5 albert square/Archive33

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

18:24, 8 April 2019 (UTC)

Tilly Keeper

just wondering about the revert of my edit on Tilly Keeper, is there a certain rule/guideline against using promo pics on actor pages? i thought the photo was much better & more up to date than the current one. – DarkGlow (talk) 20:40, 10 April 2019 (UTC)

Yes - there's WP:FREER which states "Non-free content cannot be used in cases where a free content equivalent, with an acceptable quality sufficient to serve the encyclopedic purpose, is available or could be created'. AnemoneProjectors took a photo of Tilly Keeper at a meet and greet event at the BBC, therefore a free image exists, therefore a non-free image cannot be used. The image you replaced it with has restrictions when it can be used because it is copyrighted to the BBC.-- 5 albert square (talk) 20:58, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
Also DarkGlow, just to add to what I said above, even if AnemoneProjectors hadn't taken a photo of Tilly Keeper, we still wouldn't be able to use the publicity photo on her article simply because she is still alive therefore another free alternative would still be possible. The only time we can really add something like a publicity photo to that type of article is when the subject of the article has died and that's because the likelihood of Wikipedia ever getting a free alternative is greatly reduced. You also have to be careful about how you apply photos to Wikipedia so the article isn't unnecessarily dominated by them. For example, when I met Shane Richie I took a photo of him and I uploaded it to Commons so either they or any of the other Wikipedias can use it if they want to, however the English Wikipedia isn't using it because there's no need for it because it doesn't show anything different to what the current image shows.-- 5 albert square (talk) 08:17, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
I may be meeting Tilly at the Soap Awards in June, so if I remember, I’ll get a photo of her so it can be updated. That’ll be ok right? – DarkGlow (talk) 08:21, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
AnemoneProjectors ^^^^ as it's your image that is potentially being replaced.-- 5 albert square (talk) 08:37, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
If it's a better image then that's fine. Mine is badly backlit. — 🌼📽️AnemoneProjectors💬 08:43, 11 April 2019 (UTC)

@AnemoneProjectors: BTW, I hope you don’t feel as though I’m trying to push your image out! I’ve never added an image to Wiki so it would be fun to have my image on Tilly’s article, if possible! Have a great day – DarkGlow (talk) 08:48, 11 April 2019 (UTC)

@DarkGlow: Well, you sort of were lol but if you do meet her and get a photo then great, you can replace mine. She had the window behind her when I met her and I had the same problem with Jamie Borthwick and Rita Simons. I should have used the flash like I did for Emma Barton but it's too late now! :-) Is there anyone else you might be meeting at the Soap Awards? — 🌼📽️AnemoneProjectors💬 08:55, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
@DarkGlow: Bryan Kirkwood could do with a better image should you happen to see him. We sort of have half his face in the current image!-- 5 albert square (talk) 09:05, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
If only Danny-Boy Hatchard was going to be there. — 🌼📽️AnemoneProjectors💬 09:07, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
I don't think he's been in anything since EastEnders so I'd say it's highly unlikely he'll be there. DarkGlow, AP actually received a Twitter message from Danny-Boy asking him to remove the image we had of him on the English Wikipedia, we think it was because the image showed that he had a small spot on his chin! Someone removed it from Wikipedia, he also asked for it to be removed from Commons but that'll never happen because it doesn't break any of their rules. Personally I'd be more worried that his filmography reads that he's basically done nothing since EastEnders!-- 5 albert square (talk) 09:20, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
Oh he won't be there but if only he was lol — 🌼📽️AnemoneProjectors💬 09:26, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
I’ll try to get photos of everyone from any of the 5 soaps, as I should be able to meet virtually everyone who steps on the red carpet, if they stop! And, if only Danny-Boy spent that time booking roles rather than surfing his own Wikipedia... – DarkGlow (talk) 09:37, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
Well I look forward to seeing any photos you get! — 🌼📽️AnemoneProjectors💬 15:02, 11 April 2019 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia:Arbitration/Policy/Proposed amendment (April 2019). Legobot (talk) 04:30, 11 April 2019 (UTC)

23:00, 15 April 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Tutorial

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Tutorial. Legobot (talk) 04:29, 18 April 2019 (UTC)

19:08, 23 April 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Template talk:Rfc

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Template talk:Rfc. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 25 April 2019 (UTC)

22:27, 29 April 2019 (UTC)

The Signpost: 30 April 2019

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Template talk:Country data New Caledonia. Legobot (talk) 04:29, 1 May 2019 (UTC)

Please help

There is an user that keeps edit-warring on my own talk page. I asked him to stop but he continues to vandalize. He did it a total of 21 times already. I would not complain about it but this situation needs to stop. This is really getting annoying. HÊÚL. (talk) 03:24, 2 May 2019 (UTC)

HÊÚL. It's because they don't understand why you keep removing them. They're saying that they spoke to Sergecross73 who told them that the comment could be deleted as there was no replies apparently. Maybe you could post on their talk page explaining why you would like the comment kept? Also, please remember to include an edit summary whenever you are editing a page - including user talk pages. Edit summaries help other users understand your edits and could have prevented this at the start.-- 5 albert square (talk) 10:20, 2 May 2019 (UTC)
First of all, there is not a "they", just a "he". Also Sergecross said to him that since it is my talk page I can delete or keep whatever I want. The reversion is the best reply he deserves. I never imagined that I needed to explain it because (I think) he is not a kid. And what about the edit warring and the 3RR? HÊÚL. (talk) 11:43, 2 May 2019 (UTC)
I'm going to wait for @Sergecross73: to reply about this first.-- 5 albert square (talk) 22:25, 2 May 2019 (UTC)
I think both editors are being silly. There’s no particular reason why the message needs to be kept or deleted. Both should stop wasting the time of other editors, and their own time, on this. Sergecross73 msg me 00:38, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
Really sorry, I'll put a definite stop to this. I apologize for wasting other's time and I'll move on from this silliness. Thanks in advance. Namcokid47 (talk) 04:05, 3 May 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 special circular

Icon of a white exclamation mark within a black triangle
Administrators must secure their accounts

The Arbitration Committee may require a new RfA if your account is compromised.

View additional information

This message was sent to all administrators following a recent motion. Thank you for your attention. For the Arbitration Committee, Cameron11598 02:53, 4 May 2019 (UTC)

Administrator account security (Correction to Arbcom 2019 special circular)

ArbCom would like to apologise and correct our previous mass message in light of the response from the community.

Since November 2018, six administrator accounts have been compromised and temporarily desysopped. In an effort to help improve account security, our intention was to remind administrators of existing policies on account security — that they are required to "have strong passwords and follow appropriate personal security practices." We have updated our procedures to ensure that we enforce these policies more strictly in the future. The policies themselves have not changed. In particular, two-factor authentication remains an optional means of adding extra security to your account. The choice not to enable 2FA will not be considered when deciding to restore sysop privileges to administrator accounts that were compromised.

We are sorry for the wording of our previous message, which did not accurately convey this, and deeply regret the tone in which it was delivered.

For the Arbitration Committee, -Cameron11598 21:03, 4 May 2019 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals). Legobot (talk) 04:28, 6 May 2019 (UTC)

16:27, 6 May 2019 (UTC)