User talk:64.56.14.75

September 2023[edit]

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 months for block evasion.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 22:47, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Karen Ryan (March 27)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Chetsford was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

I'm very reluctantly declining this only because all the (significant) references relate to her involvement in Nimona and so may run afoul of WP:BLP1E. If possible, please add some references that provide WP:SIGCOV of her outside of Nimona.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Karen Ryan and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Chetsford (talk) 06:07, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, 64.56.14.75! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Chetsford (talk) 06:07, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

April 2024[edit]

Hello, I'm TechnoSquirrel69. I noticed that in this edit to Ruby Gillman, Teenage Kraken, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 00:03, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Ruby Gillman, Teenage Kraken. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. AgisdeSparte (talk) 23:12, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Look, this mess is all Exteahans71's fault. I'm trying to make it tidy up over this Artbook being the source thing but no one argees if it's fine or not. He made the production section a mess. 64.56.14.75 (talk) 23:15, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@AgisdeSparte Haven't you check what he did to make it a mess so far? "Exteahans71 impersonating admins, blanking warnings, and edit warring with no explanations/sources" This is what's going on with him so far and how he made a mess on Ruby Gillman, Teenage Kraken. It's not my fault my edits were being unconstructive. It's him that's being unconstructive about the page. He even tried to block me for disruptive editing. You have to understand. 64.56.14.75 (talk) 23:18, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

New message from TechnoSquirrel69[edit]

Hello, 64.56.14.75. You have new messages at TechnoSquirrel69's talk page.
Message added 00:10, 2 April 2024 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

—TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 00:10, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

April 2024[edit]

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 6 months for block evasion.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 22:32, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.