User talk:66.135.166.218

June 2021

Hello, I'm Joel.Miles925. I wanted to let you know that some of your recent contributions to Bob Chapek have been reverted or removed because they seem to be defamatory or libellous. Take a look at our welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Joel.Miles925 (talk) 23:35, 30 June 2021 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

I have no idea what you are talking about. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.135.166.218 (talk) 03:54, July 16, 2021 (UTC)

Which part do you not understand? Your initial edit to the article Bob Chapek, as well as this subsequent one, are clearly defamatory statements that are not written in a nuetral point-of-view. Such edits may be regarded as vandalism and you may be blocked if you continue this behavior. InfiniteNexus (talk) 04:26, 16 July 2021 (UTC)

YOU are a smartass and you're all a bunch of social terrorists. Our museum will never donate to Wikipedia again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.135.166.218 (talk) 00:40, July 19, 2021 (UTC)

Please avoid making personal attacks. Thank you. InfiniteNexus (talk) 01:25, 19 July 2021 (UTC)

Let me tell you why 98% of Wikipedia visitors do not donate. BECAUSE YOU CLAIM EXCLUSIVE RIGHT TO THE DISEMINATION OF DATA AND ONLY ALLOW A POINT OF VIEW THAT YOU PERSONALLY APPROVE OF! You are like the Nazi Propaganda machine. So NO, most people will NOT donate. I USED TO donate, until you THUGS started deleting and blackballing me for my entries DESPITE the fact that I am a doctorate-holding National Geographic museum historian and author and I know what I'm talking about. But you Nazis allow SLANDER throughout the site while blocking ACTUAL HISTORIC FACTS that you don't like or conveniently deem 'irrelevant' in your puny minds. So I won't ever donate again, and I warn all of our museum guests to beware of Wikipedia's ENFORCED BIAS.

July 2021

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Bob Chapek. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. InfiniteNexus (talk) 00:13, 1 July 2021 (UTC)

Sandboxes are for children. When will you grow up and get help for your disgusting superiority complex?

June 2022

Hello, I'm RteeeeKed. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Herod the Great have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. RteeeeKed💬📖 20:37, 5 June 2022 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

August 2023

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the page Barry Clifford has an edit summary that appears to be inadequate, inaccurate, or inappropriate. The summaries are helpful to people browsing an article's history, so it is important that you use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did. Feel free to use the sandbox to make test edits. Thank you. Idontknowwhattouseasmyusername300 (talk) 15:26, 23 August 2023 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

---